This article explores the tension between the child’s best interests principle and children’s participation and examines the inherent challenges and different approaches to reconcile the dilemma in law and practice: how can children’s best interests be reconciled with their right to be heard? By exploring different systems’ institutional approaches and empirical ability to implement and honour children’s right to participation in national contexts, this article reviews the literature and suggests a framework for understanding participation through a lens of a global typology of child protection systems. Drawing on the conceptual and empirical reviews and elements from the deliberative ideal for decision-making, the article concludes by drawing up a sketch for a best interest model for meaningful, respectful and successful participation with global applicability. The model aims to enhance children’s citizenship and legitimacy of decision-making in child protection.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abdullah, A., Cudjoe, E. and Frederico, M., “Barriers to Children’s Participation in Child Protection Practice: The Views and Experiences of Practitioners in Ghana”, Children Australia 2018 (43(4)), 267–275.
African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, oau, Doc. cab/leg/24.9/49 (1990).
Arbeiter, E. and Toros, K., “Participatory discourse: Engagement in the context of child protection assessment practices from the perspectives of child protection workers, parents and children”, cysr 2017 (74), 17–27.
Archard, D., Children, Family, and the State (Farnham: Ashgate, 2003).
Archard, D. and Skivenes, M., “Hearing the child”, Child & Family Social Work 2009a (14(4)), 391–399.
Archard, D. and Skivenes, M., “Balancing a Child’s Best Interests and a Child’s Views”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights 2009b (17(1)), 1–21.
Archard, D. and Skivenes, M., “Deciding best interests: General principles and the cases of Norway and the UK”, Journal of Children’s Services 2010 (5(4)), 43–54.
Bagshaw, D., “Reshaping Responses to Children When Parents are Separating: Hearing Children’s Voices in the Transition”, Australian Social Work 2007 (60(4)), 450–465.
Balsells, M. Á., Fuentes-Peláez, N. and Pastor, C., “Listening to the voices of children in decision-making: A challenge for the child protection system in Spain”, cysr 2017 (79), 418–425.
Bell, M., “Promoting children’s rights through the use of relationship”, Child & Family Social Work 2002 (7(1)), 1–11.
Berrick, J. D., Gilbert, N. and Skivenes, M., “Child Protection System: Across the World”, in J.D. Berrick, N. Gilbert, and M. Skivenes (eds.), International Handbook of Child Protection Systems (UK: Oxford University Press, 2023a).
Berrick, J. D., Gilbert, N. and Skivenes, M., “Child Protection System: A Global Typology”, in J.D. Berrick, N. Gilbert and M. Skivenes (eds.), International Handbook of Child Protection Systems (UK: Oxford University Press, 2023b).
Bessell, S., “Participation in decision-making in out-of-home care in Australia: What do young people say?,” cysr 2011 (33(4)), 496–501.
Bouma, H., López López, M., Knorth, E. J. and Grietens, H., “Meaningful participation for children in the Dutch child protection system: A critical analysis of relevant provisions in policy documents”, Child Abuse & Neglect 2018 (79), 279–292.
Brighouse, H., “How should children be heard?” Arizona Law Review 2003 (45), 691–711.
Burns, K., Pösö, T. and Skivenes, M., “Removals of children by the child welfare system – variations and differences across countries”, in K. Burns, T. Pösö and M. Skivenes (eds.), Taking children into state care: A cross-country analysis of child welfare systems (UK: Oxford University Press, 2017), 234–247.
Cashmore, J., “Promoting the participation of children and young people in care”, Child Abuse & Neglect 2002 (26(8)), 837–847.
Cudjoe, E., Abdullah, A. and Chua, A. A., “Children’s Participation in Child Protection Practice in Ghana: Practitioners’ Recommendations for Practice”, Journal of Social Service Research 2020 (46(4)), 462–474.
Cudjoe, E., Uggerhøj, L. and Abdullah, A., “‘We are consultants, not collaborators’: Young people’s experiences with child protection meetings in Ghana”, cysr 2020 (109), 104748.
Cudjoe, E., Abdullah, A. and Manful, E., “Parents’ Perceptions on the Outcomes of Children’s Participation in Child Protection Meetings in Ghana”, Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2020 (30(4)), 1071–1081.
Daly, A., “No Weight for Due Weight? A Children’s Autonomy Principle in Best Interest Proceedings”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights 2018 (26), 61–92.
De Bruin D.W., Child participation and representation in legal matters (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria, 2010).
Department for Education, The Munro Review ofcp: The Child’s Journey (London: The Stationary Office, 2010).
Duramy, B. F. and Gal, T., “Understanding and implementing child participation: Lessons from the Global South”, cysr 2020 (119).
Eekelaar, J., “The Emergence of Children’s Rights”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1986 (6(2)), 161–182.
Enroos, R., Helland, H. S., Pösö, T., Skivenes, M. and Tonheim, M., “The role and function of the spokesperson in care order proceedings: A cross-country study in Finland and Norway”, cysr 2017 (74), 8–16.
Feinberg, J., “The Child’s Right to an Open Future”, in W. Aiken and H. LaFollette (eds.), Whose Child? Children’s Rights, Parental Authority, and State Power (Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 1980), 124–153.
Fenton-Glynn, C., “The child’s voice in adoption proceedings: A European perspective”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights 2013 (21(4)), 590–615.
Forandringsfabrikken, Forstå det viktigste (Oslo: Forandringsfabrikken Kunnskapssenter, 2020a).
Forandringsfabrikken, Snakke trygt (Oslo: Forandringsfabrikken Kunnskapssenter, 2020b).
Freeman, M., “Taking Children’s Rights more Seriously”, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 1992 (6(1)), 52–71.
Freeman, M., “Children’s education; a test case for best interests and autonomy”, in R. Davie and D. Galloway (eds.), Listening to children in education (UK: David Fulton, 1996).
Freeman, M., “The Right to Be Heard”, Adoption & Fostering 1998 (22(4)), 50–59.
Gal, T. and Duramy, B., “Enhancing Capacities for Child Participation: Introduction”, in T. Gal and B. Duramy (eds.), International Perspectives and Empirical Findings on Child Participation: From Social Exclusion to Child-Inclusive Policies, 1–16 (UK: Oxford University Press, 2015).
Gerdts-Andresen, T., “A scoping review of when and how a child’s view is weighted in decision-making processes in law proceedings”, cysr 2021(129), 106197.
Gerdts-Andresen, T. and Aarum Hansen, H., “How the child’s views is weighted in care order proceedings”, cysr 2021 (129), 106179.
Gilbert, N., Parton, N. and Skivenes, M., Child Protection Systems: International Trends and Orientations (UK: Oxford University Press, 2011).
Harris, P. and Manatakis, H., Children’s voices: A principled framework for children and young people’s participation as valued citizens and learners (Adelaide: University of South Australia and South Australian Department for Education and Child Development, Adelaide, 2013).
Hart, R. A., Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship (NY: International Child Development Centre, 1992).
Helland, H. S., “Reasoning between Rules and Discretion: A Comparative Study of the Normative Platform for Best Interest Decision-Making on Adoption in England and Norway”, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2021 (35(1)).
Helland, H. S., Križ, K. and Skivenes, M., “Gauging the Child’s Presence and Voice in Adoption Proceedings of Children from Care in Seven European Countries: Applying a Child Equality Perspective”, in N. Lowe and C. Fenton-Glynn (eds.), Research Handbook on Adoption (UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023).
Helland, H. S. and Skivenes, M., Adopsjon som barneverntiltak (Bergen: Centre for Research on Discretion and Paternalism, 2019).
Hultman, E., Höjer, S. and Larsson, M., “Age limits for participation in child protection court proceedings in Sweden”, Child & Family Social Work 2020 (25(2)), 304–312.
Humphreys, C. and Stanley, N., Domestic Violence and Child Protection: Directions for Good Practice (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2006).
Kennan, D., Brady, B. and Forkan, C., “Supporting Children’s Participation in Decision Making: A Systematic Literature Review Exploring the Effectiveness of Participatory Processes”, The British Journal of Social Work 2018 (48(7)), 1985–2002.
Kjørholt, A. T., “Small is Powerful: Discourses on ‘Children and Participation’ in Norway”, Childhood 2002 (9(1)), 63–82.
Kravchuk, N., “The child’s right to express his/ her views in the Context of Russian culture and democracy”, Russian Law Journal 2014 (2), 23–48.
Lansdown G., The Evolving Capacities of the Child (Florence: unicef Innocenti, 2005).
Lauri, K., Toros, K. and Lehtme, R., “Participation in the Child Protection Assessment: Voices from Children in Estonia”, Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 2021 (38(2)), 211–226.
Lundy, L., “‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child”, British Educational Research Journal 2007 (33(6)), 927–942.
Magnussen, A-M. and Skivenes, M., The Child’s Opinion and Position in Care Order Proceedings: An Analysis of Judicial Discretion in the County Boards’ Decision-Making, The International Journal of Children’s Rights 2015 (23(4)), 705–723.
McCarthy, E., “Young People in Residential Care, their Participation and the Influencing Factors”, Child Care in Practice 2016 (22(4)), 368–385.
Mol, C., “Children’s Representation in Family Law Proceedings: A Comparative Evaluation in Light of Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights 2019 (27(1)), 66–98.
Nylund, A., “Children’s Right to Participate in Decision-Making in Norway: Paternalism and Autonomy”, Children’s Constitutional Rights in the Nordic Countries 2019, 201–224.
Odinokova, V. and Rusakova, M., “Participation of Children in Decision-Making and Their Psychosocial Wellbeing Within the Child Protection System in St. Petersburg, Russia”, Zhurnal Issledovanii Sotsialnoi Politiki/The Journal of Social Policy Studies 2019 (17(4)), 643–656.
Ormstad, S., Hestevik, C., Munthe-Kaas, H., Blaasvær, N. and Muller, A., Barn og unges medvirkning i barnevernet: En systematisk kartleggingsoversikt (Oslo: fhi, 2020).
Pösö, T., Thoburn, J. and Skivenes, M., “Making sense of adoption from care in very different contexts”, in T. Pösö, J. Thoburn, and M. Skivenes, Adoption from Care: International Perspectives on Children’s Rights, Family Preservation and State Intervention (Bristol: Policy Press, 2021), 249–264.
Proff, A., Proff, G., Steinrem, I. and Toresen, G. (eds.), Barnas Barnevern (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2018).
Rap, S., Verkroost, D. and Bruning, M., “Children’s participation in Dutch youth care practice: An exploratory study into the opportunities for child participation in youth care from professionals’ perspective”, Child Care in Practice 2019 (25(1)), 37–50.
The Family Code of the Russian Federation (1995), no. 223-fz, iv. Article 57.
Saarnik, H., Sindi, I. and Toros, K. “‘Well, the Child Can’t Choose, Right?’: Foster Children’s Participation Experiences of Child Protection Removal Practices”, Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 2023, 1–12.
Sandberg, K., “Best interests of the child in the Norwegian Constitution”, in T. Haugli, A. Nylund, R. Sigurdsen and L.R.L. Bendiksen (eds.), in Children’s Constitutional Rights in the Nordic Countries, 133–158 (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2019).
Shier, H., “Pathways to participation: Openings, opportunities and obligations”, Children & Society 2001 (15(2)), 107–117.
Sinclair, R., “Participation in practice: Making it meaningful, effective and sustainable”, Children & Society 2004 (18(2)), 106–118.
Skauge, B., Storhaug, A. S. and Marthinsen, E., “The What, Why and How of Child Participation – A Review of the Conceptualization of ‘Child Participation’ in Child Welfare”, Social Sciences 2021 (10(2)), 54.
Skivenes, M. and Sørsdal, L. M., “The child’s best interest principle across child protection jurisdictions”, in A. Falch-Eriksen and E. Backe-Hansen (eds.), Human Rights in Child Protection – Implications for Professional Practice and Policy, (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018), 59–88.
Skivenes, M. and Strandbu, A., “A Child Perspective and Children’s Participation”, Children, Youth and Environments 2006 (16(2)), 10–27.
Spyrou, S., “The limits of children’s voices: From authenticity to critical, reflexive representation”, Childhood 2011(18(2)), 151–165.
Sutherland, E. E., “Listening to the Child’s Voice in the Family Setting: From Aspiration to Reality”, Child and Family Law Quarterly 2014 (26(2)), 152–172.
Thoburn, J., “Child welfare and child protection services in England”, in J.D. Berrick, N. Gilbert and M. Skivenes (eds.), International Handbook of Child Protection Systems. (UK: Oxford University, 2023).
Thomas, N. and O’Kane, C. “When children’s wishes and feelings clash with their ‘best interests’”. International Journal of Children’s Rights 1998 (6), 137–154.
Thomas, N. and O’Kane, C., “Children’s participation in reviews and planning meetings when they are looked after in middle childhood”, Child and family social work 1999 (4), 221–230.
Thomas, N., “Towards a Theory of Children’s Participation”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights 2007 (15), 199–218.
Toivonen, V., Muhonen, J., Kalliomaa-Puha, L., Luhamaa, K. and Strömpl, J., “Child Participation in Estonian and Finnish Child Welfare Removals – Professionals’ Perceptions and Practices”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights 2021 (29(3)), 701–730.
Toros, K., “A systematic review of children’s participation in child protection decision-making: Tokenistic presence or not?”, Children & Society 2021 (35(3)), 395–411.
Toros, K. and Falch-Eriksen, A., “‘I do not want to cause additional pain …’ – child protection workers’ perspectives on child participation in child protection practice”, Journal of Family Social Work 2021(24(1)), 43–59.
Toros, K. and LaSala, M. C., “Estonian child protection workers’ assessment perspectives: The need for competence and confidence”, International Social Work 2018 (61(1)), 93–105.
Toros, K., LaSala, M. C. and Tiko, A., “Assessment of the developmental needs of children in need: Estonian child protective workers’ case reflections”, Child & Family Social Work 2017 (22(2)), 843–852.
Twum-Danso, A., “The construction of childhood and the socialisation of children in Ghana: Implications for the implementation of Article 12 of the crc”, in B. Percy-Smith and N.P. Thomas (eds.), A Handbook of Children and Young People’s Participation (London: Routledge, 2009).
United Nations, Convention on the Rights of the Child, Treaty Series, vol. 1577: 3.
U.N. General Assembly, uncrc (1989).
UN crc Committee, General Comment No. 12. (2009), The right of the child to be heard, crc/c/gc/12.
UN crc Committee, General comment No. 14 (2013), The right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration (Art.3, para. 1), crc/c/gc/14.
van Bijleveld, G. G., Dedding, C. W. M. and Bunders-Aelen, J. F. G., “Seeing eye to eye or not? Young people’s and child protection workers’ perspectives on children’s participation within the Dutch child protection and welfare services”, cysr 2014 (47), 253–259.
van Bijleveld, G. G., Dedding, C. W. M., and Bunders-Aelen, J. F. G., “Children’s and young people’s participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state-of-the-art review”, Child & Family Social Work 2015 (20(2)), 129–138.
Vis, S. A. and Fossum, S.,“Representation of children’s views in court hearings about custody and parental visitations – A comparison between what children wanted and what the courts ruled”, cysr 2013 (35(12)), 2101–2109.
Vis, S. A., Holtan, A. and Thomas, N., “Obstacles for child participation in care and protection cases – Why Norwegian social workers find it difficult”, Child Abuse Review 2012 (21(1)), 7–23.
Vis, S. A., Strandbu, A., Holtan, A. and Thomas, N., “Participation and health – a research review of child participation in planning and decision-making”, Child & Family Social Work 2011 (16(3)), 325–335.
Vis, S. A., Lauritzen C., Christiansen Ø., Reedtz, C., “Do the Child Welfare and Protection Services Involve Children in Cases With Parental Mental Health Problems? A Norwegian Case-File Study”, Frontiers in Psychiatry 2022 (12).
Winter, K., “The perspectives of young children in care about their circumstances and implications for social work practice”, Child & Family Social Work 2010 (15(2)), 186–195.
Witte, S., Lopez Lopez, M. and Baldwin, H., “The voice of the child in child protection decision-making: A cross-country comparison of policy and practice in England, Germany, and the Netherlands”, in J. Fluke, M. López, R. Benbenishty, E.J. Knorth and D. Baumann (eds.), Decision Making and Judgement in Child Welfare and Protection. (UK: Oxford University Press, 2020).
Zermatten, J., “The Best Interests of the Child Principle: Literal Analysis and Function”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights 2010 (18(4)), 483–499.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 959 | 959 | 74 |
Full Text Views | 486 | 486 | 7 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 669 | 669 | 21 |
This article explores the tension between the child’s best interests principle and children’s participation and examines the inherent challenges and different approaches to reconcile the dilemma in law and practice: how can children’s best interests be reconciled with their right to be heard? By exploring different systems’ institutional approaches and empirical ability to implement and honour children’s right to participation in national contexts, this article reviews the literature and suggests a framework for understanding participation through a lens of a global typology of child protection systems. Drawing on the conceptual and empirical reviews and elements from the deliberative ideal for decision-making, the article concludes by drawing up a sketch for a best interest model for meaningful, respectful and successful participation with global applicability. The model aims to enhance children’s citizenship and legitimacy of decision-making in child protection.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 959 | 959 | 74 |
Full Text Views | 486 | 486 | 7 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 669 | 669 | 21 |