The Relevance of Athanasius in Dogmatics

in Church History and Religious Culture
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This article deals with the reception of Athanasius in systematic theology. The first section focuses on quantitative data. It turns out that Athanasius, though often hailed as one of the greatest Church fathers, is not quoted very frequently when compared e.g. with Augustine. Major systematic works do not refer to him at all, or scarcely. The second part directs its attention to the content of the reception. The core of Athanasius’s importance is found in his Christology: God became human so that humans become God. Soteriology and Christology are one and the same and this can also get the face of pneumatology: participation in the Spirit of God. Other aspects of Athanasius work whereto is referred, are his list of canonical books and his view on theological epistemology. In the final section the author stresses once again the priority of Athanasius’s interpretation of the homoousios over any other Christological model.

The Relevance of Athanasius in Dogmatics

in Church History and Religious Culture

Sections

References

27

Paul TillichSystematic Theology (Digswell Place: Nisbet1968).

51

Cf. AthanasiusContra Gentes 8.3.

55

See especially AthanasiusContra Arianos 3.31.

64

AthanasiusDe Incarnatione et contra Arianos 8.

74

AthanasiusContra Arianos 3.31.

82

AthanasiusEpistula Festales 393.

84

AthanasiusEpistula Festales 397.

87

TertullianDe praescriptione haereticorum 7.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 6 6 2
Full Text Views 2 2 2
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0