See Theo Verbeek, ‘From “Learned Ignorance” to Scepticism: Descartes and Calvinist Orthodoxy,’ in Scepticism and Irreligion in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, ed. Richard H. Popkin and Arjo Vanderjagt (Leiden, 1993), pp. 31–45.

See Theo Verbeek, ‘From “Learned Ignorance” to Scepticism: Descartes and Calvinist Orthodoxy,’ in Scepticism and Irreligion in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, ed. Richard H. Popkin and Arjo Vanderjagt (Leiden, 1993), pp. 31–45.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

See Ernestine van der Wall, ‘Cartesianism and Cocceianism: a Natural Alliance?’ in De l’Humanisme aux Lumières, Bayle et le protestantisme, ed. Michelle Magdelaine et al. (Paris, 1996), pp. 445–455; Van Asselt, Federal theology (see above, n. 9), pp. 81–86. The still debated question about the nature of this alliance lies beyond the scope of the present investigation, but as far as Van Til is concerned, Van der Wall’s suggestion seems plausible: Both Cartesianism and Cocceianism favor a clearer distinction between natural and revealed theology as opposed to the traditional scholastic approach.

See Ernestine van der Wall, ‘Cartesianism and Cocceianism: a Natural Alliance?’ in De l’Humanisme aux Lumières, Bayle et le protestantisme, ed. Michelle Magdelaine et al. (Paris, 1996), pp. 445–455; Van Asselt, Federal theology (see above, n. 9), pp. 81–86. The still debated question about the nature of this alliance lies beyond the scope of the present investigation, but as far as Van Til is concerned, Van der Wall’s suggestion seems plausible: Both Cartesianism and Cocceianism favor a clearer distinction between natural and revealed theology as opposed to the traditional scholastic approach.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Paul Dibon, ‘Der Cartesianismus in den Niederlanden,’ in Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Frankreich und Niederlande, ed. Jean-Pierre Schobinger, 2 vols. (Basel, 1993), 1: 349–374, there 367 (The translation is my own).

Paul Dibon, ‘Der Cartesianismus in den Niederlanden,’ in Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Frankreich und Niederlande, ed. Jean-Pierre Schobinger, 2 vols. (Basel, 1993), 1: 349–374, there 367 (The translation is my own).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

See Jonathan Israel, ‘The Banning of Spinoza’s Works in the Dutch Republic (1670–1678),’ in Disguised and overt Spinozism around 1700, ed. Wiep van Bunge and Wim Klever (Leiden, 1996), pp. 3–14.

See Jonathan Israel, ‘The Banning of Spinoza’s Works in the Dutch Republic (1670–1678),’ in Disguised and overt Spinozism around 1700, ed. Wiep van Bunge and Wim Klever (Leiden, 1996), pp. 3–14.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

See ibid., p. 9 and cf. ibid., pp. 21–22.

See ibid., p. 8.

See Aza Goudriaan, ‘Die Rezeption des cartesianischen Gottesgedankens bei Abraham Heidanus,’ Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 38 (1996), 166–168.

See Aza Goudriaan, ‘Die Rezeption des cartesianischen Gottesgedankens bei Abraham Heidanus,’ Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 38 (1996), 166–168.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

See ibid., p. 13 and cf. ibid., CTN, p. 156. On the scholarly debate concerning this very issue at the end of the seventeenth century see Jacob van Sluis, Herman Alexander Röell (Leeuwarden, 1988), pp. 59–79.

Ibid., p. 8.

Ibid., p. 7.

See Robert C. Miner, ‘The Dependence of Descartes’ Ontological Proof upon the Doctrine of Causa sui,’ Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 58 (2002), 873–886.

See Robert C. Miner, ‘The Dependence of Descartes’ Ontological Proof upon the Doctrine of Causa sui,’ Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 58 (2002), 873–886.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation