Save

The Archaeology of Intermediation: Prolegomena on Mongol Elements in Later Byzantine Art and Material Culture

In: Crossroads
Author:
Nikolaos Vryzidis Department of History and Archaeology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Greece

Search for other papers by Nikolaos Vryzidis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0115-7133
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Later Byzantine (1261–1453) diplomacy was generally characterised by pragmatism, especially in the empire’s choice of allies that could foster its political stability and mitigate its financial burdens. Among its more distant allies were the different Mongol polities that stretched from Central Asia up to the Caucasus and Eastern Europe. Despite not being immediate neighbours, the relationship between Byzantium and the Mongols was marked by intermediation, both in terms of the actors that functioned across the two realms and of the service the one could provide to the interests of the other. Within this frame, the following article will attempt a preliminary assessment of the Mongol element in later Byzantine art and material culture, and its possible use as a secondary source on this complex relationship. It will argue that while the Mongol contribution to Byzantine art and material culture was visible especially during the fourteenth century, there are instances which reveal a certain ambivalence towards it.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 139 139 17
Full Text Views 23 23 2
PDF Views & Downloads 48 48 5