Linguistic evidence for a closer relationship between Lhokpu and Dhimal

Including some remarks on the Dhimalish subgroup

In: Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale
View More View Less
  • 1 Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Bern

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€25.00$30.00

Abstract

Lhokpu is a hitherto undescribed and unclassified Trans-Himalayan language spoken by some 2,500 speakers in southwestern Bhutan. Fieldwork in 2015 now enables linguistic research on the language, including accounts on its phylogenetic position within the language family. This paper presents morphological, lexical, and phonological evidence for a closer phylogenetic relationship between Lhokpu and Dhimal (southeastern Nepal). Dhimal is conventionally grouped together with Toto under “Dhimalish.” We argue in this paper that the similarities between Lhokpu and Dhimal are equally profound and numerous, and that Lhokpu, Dhimal, and Toto are three closely related languages within the Trans-Himalayan family.

  • Andvik, Erik. 2010. A grammar of Tshangla. Leiden: Brill.

  • Baxter, William H. & Sagart, Laurent. 2014a. Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Baxter, William H. & Sagart, Laurent. 2014b. Baxter-Sagart Old Chinese reconstruction. Version 1.1. 20 September 2014. http://ocbaxtersagart.lsait.lsa.umich.edu.

  • Benedict, Paul K. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bickel, Balthasar. 2003. Belhare. In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 546–570. London: Routledge.

  • Bickel, Balthasar & Banjade, Goma & Gaenszle, Martin & Lieven, Elena & Paudyal, Netra Prasad & Rai, Ichchha Purna & Rai, Manoj & Rai, Novel Kishore & Stoll, Sabine. 2007. Free prefix ordering in Chintang. Language 83(1). 43–73.

  • Bishnu, Sudhirkumar. 2012. A descriptive study of Toto language. Kolkata: The Shee Book Agency.

  • Bodt, Timotheus A. 2012. The new lamp clarifying the history, peoples, languages and traditions of eastern Bhutan and eastern Mon. Wageningen: Monpasang Publications.

  • Bodt, Timotheus A. & Lieberherr, Ismael. 2015. First notes on the phonology and classification of the Bangru language of India. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38(1). 66–123.

  • Borchers, Dörte. 2008. A grammar of Sunwar: Descriptive grammar, paradigms, texts and glossary. Leiden: Brill.

  • Bradley, David. 2002. The subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman. In Beckwith, Christopher (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages, 73–112. Leiden: Brill.

  • Burling, Robbins. 1961. A Garo grammar. Poona: Deccan College Postgraduate & Research Institute.

  • Campbell, Lyle & Poser, William J. 2008. Language classification: History and method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Caughley, Ross. 2000. Dictionary of Chepang: A Tibeto-Burman language of Nepal. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

  • Chelliah, Shobhana L. 1997. A grammar of Meithei. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Coupe, Alexander R. 2007. A grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • DeLancey, Scott. 1984. Etymological notes on Tibeto-Burman case particles. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 11(2). 51–61.

  • DeLancey, Scott. 2010. Towards a history of verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 9(1). 1–39.

  • DeLancey, Scott. 2011. Notes on verb agreement prefixes in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 10(1). 1–29.

  • Doornenbal, Marius. 2009. A grammar of Bantawa: Grammar, paradigm tables, glossary and texts of a Rai language of eastern Nepal. Utrecht: LOT.

  • Ebert, Karen H. 1994. The structure of Kiranti languages: Comparative grammar and texts. Zürich: ASAS-Verlag.

  • Ebert, Karen H. 1997a. A grammar of Athpare. München: Lincom Europa.

  • Ebert, Karen H. 1997b. Camling. München: Lincom Europa.

  • Genetti, Carol. 2007. A grammar of Dolakha Newar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Gerber, Pascal & Gerber, Tanja & Grollmann, Selin. 2016. Links between Lhokpu and Kiranti: Some observations. (Paper presented at Workshop on Kiranti languages, Paris: Université Paris Diderot. 1–2 December 2016).

  • Grierson, George (ed.). 1909. Linguistic survey of India: Tibeto-Burman family. General introduction, specimens of the Tibetan dialects, the Himalayan dialects, and the North Assam group, vol. 3.1. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

  • Grollmann, Selin. 2013. A sketch grammar of Bjokapakha. Bern: University of Bern. (Master’s dissertation).

  • Hill, Nathan W. 2009. Review of Matisoff, James A., 2003, Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction, Berkeley: University of California Press. Language and Linguistics 10(1). 173–195.

  • Hill, Nathan W. 2011. An inventory of Tibetan sound laws. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 3rd ser. 21(4). 441–457.

  • Hill, Nathan W. 2012. The six vowel hypothesis of Old Chinese in comparative context. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 6(2). 1–69.

  • Hill, Nathan W. 2013. The merger of Proto-Burmish *ts and *č in Burmese. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 16. 333–345.

  • Hill, Nathan W. 2014. Tibeto-Burman *dz- > Tibetan z- and related proposals. In Simmons, Richard VanNess & Van Auken, Newell Ann (eds.), Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan linguistics: Dialect, phonology, transcription and text, 167–178. Taipei: Academia Sinica.

  • Hodgson, Brian Houghton. 1880. Miscellaneous essays relating to Indian subjects. 2 vols. London: Trübner & Co.

  • Huáng, Liángróng (黄良荣) & Sūn, Hóngkāi (孙宏开). 2002. Hàn-Jiāróng cídiǎn (汉嘉 戎语词典) [A Chinese–rGyalrong dictionary]. Beijing: Mínzú Chūbǎnshè.

  • Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2017. A grammar of Kurtöp. Leiden: Brill.

  • Hyslop, Gwendolyn & Tshering, Karma. 2010. Preliminary notes on Dakpa (Tawang Monpa). In Morey, Stephen & Post, Mark W. (eds.), North East Indian linguistics, vol. 2, 3–21. Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.

  • Jacques, Guillaume. 2004. Phonologie et morphologie du Japhug (rGyalrong). Paris: Université Paris vii Denis Diderot. (Doctoral dissertation).

  • Jacques, Guillaume. 2016a. Dictionnaire japhug-chinois-français. Version 1.1. Paris: Projet HimalCo. 3 August 2016. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01244860.

  • Jacques, Guillaume. 2016b. The genetic position of Chinese. In Sybesma, Rint (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol. 2, 297–306. Leiden: Brill.

  • Jacques, Guillaume. 2017. A reconstruction of Proto-Kiranti verb roots. Folia Linguistica Historica 38. 177–215.

  • Jacques, Guillaume & Lahaussois, Aimée & Michailovsky, Boyd & Rai, Dhan Bahadur. 2012. An overview of Khaling verbal morphology. Language and Linguistics 13(6). 1095–1170.

  • Jacquesson, François. 2008. A Dimasa grammar. 30 June 2008. http://brahmaputra.ceh.vjf.cnrs.fr/bdd/IMG/pdf/Dimasa_Grammar-2.pdf.

  • Jäschke, Heinrich August. 1881. A Tibetan-English dictionary: With special reference to the prevailing dialects to which is added an English-Tibetan vocabulary. London: Unger Brothers.

  • King, John T. 2009. A grammar of Dhimal. Leiden: Brill.

  • Kiryu, Kazuyuki. 2008. An outline of the Meche language: Grammar, text and glossary. Research report. Tsuyama: Mimasaka University. http://wamakidoujiten.mimasaka.jp/kiryu/pdf/meche-grammar.pdf.

  • Konnerth, Linda Anna. 2014. A grammar of Karbi. Eugene: University of Oregon. (Doctoral dissertation).

  • Lahaussois, Aimée. 2002. Aspects of the grammar of Thulung Rai: An endangered Himalayan language. Berkeley: University of California. (Doctoral dissertation).

  • LaPolla, Randy J. 1987. Dulong and Proto-Tibetan-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 10(1). 1–43.

  • LaPolla, Randy J. 2003. A grammar of Qiang: With annotated texts and glossary. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Lì, Jiāng. 2015. A grammar of Guìqióng: A Language of Sichuan. Leiden: Brill.

  • Luce, Gordon H. 1985. Phases of pre-Pagán Burma: Languages and history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Marisson, Geoffrey Edward. 1967. The classification of the Naga languages of north-east India. London: School of Oriental and African Studies. (Doctoral dissertation).

  • Matisoff, James A. 1975. Rhinoglottophilia: The mysterious connection between nasality and glottality. In Ferguson, Charles A. & Hyman, Larry M. & Ohala, John J. (eds.), Nasálfest: Papers from a symposium on nasals and nasalization, 265–287. Stanford: Language Universals Project, Department of Linguistics, Stanford University.

  • Matisoff, James A. 1976. Variational semantics in Tibeto-Burman: The “organic” approach to linguistic comparison. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.

  • Matisoff, James A. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Matisoff, James A. 2013. The dinguist’s dilemma: Regular and sporadic l/d interchange in Sino-Tibetan and elsewhere. In Thornes, Timothy J. & Andvik, Erik & Hyslop, Gwendolyn & Jansen, Joana (eds.), Functional-historical approaches to explanation: In honor of Scott DeLancey, 83–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Meillet, Antoine. 1925. La méthode comparative en linguistique historique. Oslo: H. Aschehoug & Co.

  • Michailovsky, Boyd. 1975. A case of rhinoglottophilia in Hayu. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 2(2). 293.

  • Michailovsky, Boyd. 1988. La langue hayu. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

  • Michailovsky, Boyd. 1994. Manner versus place of articulation in the Kiranti initial stops. In Kitamura, Hajime & Nishida, Tatsuo & Nagano, Yasuhiko (eds.), Current issues in Sino-Tibetan linguistics, 766–781. Osaka: The Organizing Committee of the 26th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics.

  • Michailovsky, Boyd. 2017. Kiranti languages. In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 646–679. London: Routledge.

  • Miller, Roy Andrew. 1974. Sino-Tibetan: Inspection of a conspectus. Journal of the American Oriental Society 94(2). 195–209.

  • Mortensen, David. 2003. Comparative Tangkhul. Unpublished manuscript. Berkeley: University of California. http://www.davidmortensen.org/papers/comparative_tangkhul.pdf.

  • Opgenort, Jean Robert. 2004. A grammar of Wambule: Grammar, lexicon, texts and cultural survey of a Kiranti tribe of eastern Nepal. Leiden: Brill.

  • Opgenort, Jean Robert. 2005. A grammar of Jero: With a historical comparative study of the Kiranti languages. Leiden: Brill.

  • Opgenort, Jean Robert. 2014. Initial grammatical sketch of Tilung: Field report on a moribund Kiranti language of Eastern Nepal. With some historical observations and a vocabulary. In Owen-Smith, Thomas & Hill, Nathan W. (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 329–392. Berlin: De Gruyter.

  • Plaisier, Heleen. 2007. A grammar of Lepcha. Leiden: Brill.

  • Post, Mark W. 2007. A grammar of Galo. Melbourne: La Trobe University. (Doctoral dissertation).

  • Rahman, Syed Iftiqar. 2016. Verbal agreement and grammatical description of Haʔwa Nocte. Chiang Mai: Payap University. (Master’s dissertation).

  • Rutgers, Roland. 1998. Yamphu: Grammar, texts and lexicon. Leiden: Research School CNWS, School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies.

  • Sagart, Laurent. 2006. Review of Matisoff, James A., 2003, Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction, Berkeley: University of California Press. Diachronica 23(1). 206–223.

  • Schackow, Diana. 2015. A grammar of Yakkha. Berlin: Language Science Press.

  • Schmidt, Isaac Jacob. 1841. Tibetisch-Deutsches Wörterbuch, nebstdeutschem Wortregister. Saint Petersburg: Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.

  • Shafer, Robert. 1955. Classification of the Sino-Tibetan languages. Word 11(1). 94–111.

  • Shafer, Robert. 1974. Introduction to Sino-Tibetan. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrasowitz.

  • Sharma, B. Deben. 2005. Lhops (Doya) of Bhutan: An ethnographic account. New Delhi: Akansha Publishing House.

  • Sotrug, Yeshy T. 2015. Linguistic evidence for madeskā kirā̃tī: The phylogenetic position of Dhimalish. Bern: University of Bern. (Master’s dissertation).

  • Sprigg, Richard Keith. 1987. ‘Rhinoglottophilia’ revisited: Observations on ‘the mysterious connection between nasality and glottality’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 10(1). 44–62.

  • Sun, Hongkai & Liu, Guangkun. 2009. A grammar of Anong: Language death under intense contact. (Translated, annotated, and supplemented by Li, Fengxiang & Thurgood, Ela & Thurgood, Graham). Leiden: Brill.

  • Sun, Jackson T. 1993. The linguistic position of Tani (Mirish) in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 16(2). 143–188.

  • Talukdar, G.C. 1962. A phrase book in Idu. Shillong: IN, Philological Section, Research Department, North-East Frontier Agency.

  • Thurgood, Graham. 1985. Pronouns, verb agreement systems, and the subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman. In Thurgood, Graham & Matisoff, James A. & Bradley, David (eds.), Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan area: The state of the art, 376–400. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Australian National University.

  • Thurgood, Graham. 2003. A subgrouping of the Sino-Tibetan languages: The interaction between language contact, change and inheritance. In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 3–21. London: Routledge.

  • Tolsma, Gerard Jacobus. 2006. A grammar of Kulung. Leiden: Brill.

  • Tournadre, Nicolas. 2010. The Classical Tibetan cases and their transcategoriality: From sacred grammar to modern linguistics. Himalayan Linguistics 9(2). 87–125.

  • Turin, Mark. 2012. A grammar of the Thangmi language: With an ethnolinguistic introduction to the speakers and their culture. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.

  • van Breugel, Seino. 2014. A grammar of Atong. Leiden: Brill.

  • van Driem, George. N.d.(a). The Ṭoṭo language of the Bhutanese duars: Being first impressions of the Ṭoṭo language and reflections on the Western Tibeto-Burman hypothesis. Unpublished manuscript.

  • van Driem, George. N.d.(b). A grammar of Lohorung. Unpublished manuscript.

  • van Driem, George. N.d.(c). Lhokpu: A Tibeto-Burman tongue of southwestern Bhutan. Unpublished manuscript.

  • van Driem, George. 1987. A grammar of Limbu. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • van Driem, George. 1993a. A grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • van Driem, George. 1993b. The Proto-Tibeto-Burman verbal agreement system. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 56(2). 292–334.

  • van Driem, George. 1995. Een eerste grammaticale verkenning van het Bumthang, een taal van midden-Bhutan: Met een overzicht van de talen en volkeren van Bhutan [A first grammatical exploration of Bumthang, a language of central Bhutan: With an overview of the languages and peoples of Bhutan]. Leiden: Onderzoekschool CNWS

  • van Driem, George. 1997. Sino-Bodic. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 60(3). 455–488.

  • van Driem, George. 1998. Dzongkha. Leiden: Research School CNWS, School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies.

  • van Driem, George. 2001. Languages of the Himalayas: An ethnolinguistic handbook of the Greater Himalayan region. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.

  • van Driem, George. 2003. Tibeto-Burman vs. Sino-Tibetan. In Bauer, Brigitte & Pinault, Georges-Jean (eds.), Language in time and space, 101–119. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • van Driem, George. 2004. Bhutan’s endangered languages programme under the Dzongkha Development Authority: Three rare gems. In Ura, Karma & Kinga, Sonam (eds.), The spider and the piglet: Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Bhutan studies, 294–326. Thimphu: Centre for Bhutan Studies.

  • van Driem, George. 2007. Dzala and Dakpa form a coherent subgroup within East Bodish, and some related thoughts. In Bielmeier, Roland & Haller, Felix (eds.), Linguistics of the Himalayas and beyond, 71–84. Berlin: Mouton.

  • van Driem, George. 2008. To which language family does Chinese belong, or what’s in a name? In Sanchez-Mazas, Alicia & Blench, Roger & Ross, Malcolm D. & Peiros, Ilia & Lin, Marie (eds.), Past human migrations in East Asia: Matching archaeology, linguistics and genetics, 219–253. London: Routledge.

  • van Driem, George. 2015a. Tibeto-Burman. In Wang, William S.-Y. & Sun, Chaofen (eds.), Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 135–148. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • van Driem, George. 2015b. Synoptic grammar of the Bumthang language: A language of the central Bhutan highlands. Himalayan Linguistics 6. 1–77.

  • van Driem, George & Hyslop, Gwendolyn & Gerber, Pascal & Grollmann, Selin & Tshering, Karma. in preparation. A grammar of Lhokpu.

  • VanBik, David. 2014. English to Chin (Hakha) dictionary. 20 January 2014. http://cdn.chin-dictionary.com/english-to-chin-hakha-dictionary-01.20.2014.pdf.

  • VanBik, Kenneth. 2009. Proto-Kuki-Chin: A reconstructed ancestor of the Kuki-Chin languages. Berkeley: University of California.

  • Widmer, Manuel. 2014. A descriptive grammar of Bunan. Bern: University of Bern. (Doctoral dissertation).

  • Widmer, Manuel. 2015. The transformation of verb agreement into epistemic marking: Evidence from Tibeto-Burman. In Fleischer, Jürg & Rieken, Elisabeth & Widmer, Paul (eds.), Agreement from a diachronic perspective, 53–73. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  • Wylie, Turrell. 1959. A standard system of Tibetan transcription. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 22. 261–267.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 346 106 15
Full Text Views 172 3 1
PDF Views & Downloads 21 2 2