It has been observed that Chinese resultative compounds display varied aspectual behaviors. Yong (1997) distinguishes between simple change resultatives, i.e. resultatives expressing instantaneous change, but allowing a process preliminary to the final change, and complex change resultatives, i.e. those allowing a gradual development of action. Starting from this distinction, this paper aims at providing a structural account of these resultative compounds, based on the constructionist framework put forth by Ramchand (2008), arguing that only simple change resultatives are characterized by having a result layer in their eventive structure. Complex change resultatives, in contrast, are characterized by having the result element in the complement position of the process projection, providing a scalar path. This allows a gradual change of state, and telicity emerges when the path is bounded. The paper also discusses the relation between complex change resultatives and degree achievements.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abusch, Dorit. 1986. Verbs of Change, Causation and Time. CSLI Report N 86–50. Centre for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford University.
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2010. Reduplication and doubling contrasted: Implications for the structure of the DP and the AP. Linguística—Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto 5. 9–25.
Baker, Mark C. 2003. Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives: Their Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Basciano, Bianca. 2013. Causative light verbs in Mandarin Chinese (and beyond). In Montermini, Fabio & Hathout, Nabil & Tseng, Jesse (eds.), Morphology in Toulouse. Selected Proceedings of Décembrettes 7, 57–89. Munich: Lincom Europa.
Basciano, Bianca. 2017a. Causative constructions. In Sybesma, Rint & Behr, Wolfgang & Gu, Yueguo & Handel, Zev & Huang, C.-T. James & Myers, James (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, vol. 1, 345–352. Leiden: Brill.
Basciano, Bianca. 2017b. Resultatives. In Sybesma, Rint & Behr, Wolfgang & Gu, Yueguo & Handel, Zev & Huang, C.-T. James & Myers, James (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, vol. 3, 571–582. Leiden: Brill.
Basciano, Bianca & Melloni, Chiara. 2017. Event delimitation in Mandarin: The case of diminishing reduplication. Italian Journal of Linguistics 29(1). 147–170.
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Squartini, Mario. 1995. An attempt at defining the class of “gradual completion verbs”. In Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Bianchi, Valentina & Higginbotham, James & Squartini, Mario (eds.), Temporal Reference, Aspect and Actionality, Vol. 1: Semantic and syntactic perspectives, 11–26. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.
Borer, Hagit. 1994. The projection of arguments. In Benedicto, Elena (ed.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17, 19–47. Amherst, MA.
Borer, Hagit. 2005. In Name Only. Structuring Sense, Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chen, Jidong. 2008. The Acquisition of Verb Compounding in Mandarin Chinese. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit. (Doctoral dissertation).
Chen, Ping (陈平). 1988. Lún Xiàndài Hànyǔ shíjiān xìtǒng de sān yuán jiégòu (论现代汉语时间系统的三元结构) [On the tripartite organization of the temporal system in Modern Chinese]. Zhōngguó yǔwén (中国语文) 6. 401–422.
Cheng, Lisa L.-S. & Huang, James C.-T. 1994. On the Argument Structure of Resultative Compounds. In Matthew Y. Chen & Ovid J.-L. Tzeng (eds.), In Honour of William S-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change, 187–221. Taipei: Pyramid Press.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004 [1989]. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Everaert, Martin (eds.), The Unaccusative Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, 22–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corver, Norbert. 1990. The syntax of left branch constructions. Tilburg: University of Tilburg. (Doctoral dissertation).
den Dikken, Marcel. 2010. On the Functional Structure of Locative and Directional PP s. In Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi (eds.), The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 6, 74–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ding, Yongshou (丁永寿). 2010. A Complete Guide to Teaching Chinese as a Second Language—Duìwài Hànyǔ jiàoxué cānkǎo (对外汉语教学参考). Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
Dong, Xiufang (董秀芳). 2007. Cóng cíhuìhuà de jiǎodù kàn zhānhéshì dòngbǔ jiégòu de xìngzhì (从词汇化的角度看粘合式动补结构的性质) [The properties of the resultative constructions from the perspective of lexicalization]. Yǔyán kēxué (语言科学) 6(1). 40–47.
Fábregas, Antonio & Marín, Rafael. 2018. Spanish adjectives are PathPs. In Berns, Janine & Jacobs, Haike & Nouveau, Dominique (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 29, Nijmegen, 111–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Feng, Shengli (冯胜利). 2005. Qīng dòngcí yíwèi yǔ gǔjīn Hànyǔ de dòng-bīn guānxi (轻动词移位与古今汉语的动宾关系) [Light verb movement and the verb-object relationship in Old and Modern Chinese]. Yǔyán kēxué (语言科学) 4(1). 3–16.
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Gu, Yang. 1992. The Syntax of Resultative and Causative Compounds in Chinese. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University. (Doctoral dissertation).
Guo, Rui (郭锐). 1993. Hànyǔ dòngcí de guòchéng jiégòu (汉语动词的过程结构) [The event structure of Chinese verbs]. Zhōngguó yǔwén (中国语文) 6. 410–419.
Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel J. 1986. Some Transitivity Alternations in English. Lexicon Project Working Papers 7. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Cognitive Science.
Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel J. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel J. (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 51–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel J. 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hay, Jennifer & Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements”. In Mathews, Tanya & Strolovitch, Demon (eds.), SALT IX, 127–144. CLC Publications: Ithaca.
Hoekstra, Teun. 1988. Small clause results. Lingua 74. 101–139.
Hoekstra, Teun. 1992. Aspect and Theta Theory. In Roca, Iggy M. (ed.), Thematic Structures: Its Role in Grammar, 145–174. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hoekstra, Teun. 2004. Small clauses everywhere. In Sybesma, Rint P.E. & Barbiers, Sjef & den Dikken, Marcel & Doetjes, Jenny & Postma, Gertjan & Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido (eds.), Arguments and structure: Studies on the architecture of the sentence, 319–389. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Huang, Zhengde (黄正德). 1991. Zhōngwén de liǎng zhǒng jíwù dòngcí hé liǎng zhǒng bùjíwù dòngcí (中文的兩種及物動詞和兩種不及物動詞) [Two kinds of transitive verbs and intransitive verbs in Chinese]. In Dì èr jiè shìjiè wénjiàoxué yánjiū huìyì lùnwénjí (第二屆世界華文教學研究會議論文集) [Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress of Chinese Language Studies], 39–59. Taibei: Shijie Huawen Chubanshe.
Huang, James C.-T. 1992. Complex predicates in control. In Larson, Richard K. & Iatridou, Sabine & Lahiri, Utpal, & Higginbotham, James (eds.), Control and grammar, 109–147. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Huang, James C.-T. 1997. On lexical structure and syntactic projection. Chinese Language and Linguistics 3. 45–89.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1991. Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41. 9–45.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1996. The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14. 305–354.
Kearns, Kate. 2007. Telic Senses of Deadjectival Verbs. Lingua 117. 26–66.
Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth. 2002. Telicity Corresponds to Degree of Change. (Handout, Topics in the grammar of scalar expressions, Los Angeles: UCLA, January 2002, http://semantics.uchicago.edu/kennedy/docs/telicity.pdf, accessed 18 July 2017)
Kennedy, Christopher & McNally, Louise. 2005. Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language 81(2). 345–381.
Kennedy, Christopher. 2007. Vagueness and grammar: the semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1). 1–45.
Klein, Wolfgang & Li, Ping & Hendriks, Henriette. 2000. Aspect and assertion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18. 723–770.
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Li, Audrey Y.-H. 1999. Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8. 75–99.
Li, Yafei. 1988. Chinese resultative constructions and the UTAH. In Packard, Jerome (ed.), New approaches to word formation in Chinese, 285–310. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Liao, Wei-wen. 2004. The Architecture of Aspect and Duration. Hsinchu, Taiwan: Tsing Hua University. (MA dissertation).
Lin, Jingxia & Peck, Jeeyoung. 2010. Classification of Mandarin Chinese Simple Adjectives: A Scale-Based Analysis of Their Quantitative Denotations. Language and Linguistics 17(6). 827–855.
Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2001. Light Verb Syntax and the Theory of Phrase Structure. Irvine, CA: University of California. (Doctoral dissertation).
Liu, Chen-Sheng Luther (2010). The positive morpheme in Chinese and the adjectival structure. Lingua 120: 1010–1056.
Loar, Jian Kang (2018). Learn to Use Chinese Aspect Particles. London-New York: Routledge.
Lu, Qinghe (陆庆和). 2006. Shíyòng duìwài Hànyǔ jiàoxué yǔfǎ (实用对外汉语教学语法) [A practical grammar for teaching Chinese as a foreign language]. Beijing: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe.
Lü, Shuxiang (吕叔湘). 1980. Xiàndài Hànyǔ bābǎi cí (现代汉语八百词) [Eight hundred words of Modern Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan Chubanshe.
Marín, Rafael & Mcnally, Louise. 2011. Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 467–502.
Mateu, Jaume. 2002. Argument Structure. Relational Construal at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. (Doctoral dissertation).
McClure, William T. 1995. Syntactic Projections of the Semantics of Aspect. Ithaca: Cornell University. (Doctoral dissertation).
Neeleman, Ad. 1994. Complex predicates. Utrecht: Utrecht University. (Doctoral dissertation).
Paradis, Carita. 2001. Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics 12(1). 247–271.
Peck, Jeeyoung & Lin, Jingxia & Sun, Chaofen. 2013. Aspectual Classification of Mandarin Chinese Verbs: A Perspective of Scale Structure. Language and Linguistics 14(4). 663–700.
Peng, Guozhen (彭国珍). 2007. Yīng-Hàn jiéguǒ bǔyǔ jiégòu zhōng bǔyǔ xíngróngcí de chāyì (英汉结果补语结构中补语形容词的差异) [The differences in the selectional constraints on adjectives between English and Chinese resultatives]. Yǔyán jiàoxué yǔ yánjiū (语言教学与研究) 3. 48–55.
Peng, Guozhen (彭国珍). 2011. Hànyǔ kāifàng děngjí xíngróngcí de yǔyì tèzhēng duì jùfǎ biǎoxiàn de yǐngxiǎng (汉语开放等级形容词的语义特征对句法表现的影响) [The semantic features of open scale gradable adjectives and their influence on Mandarin syntax]. Zhèjiāng Gōngyè Dàxué xuébào (浙江工业大学学报) 10(2). 236–240.
Piñón, Christopher (1997). Achievements in an event semantics. In Lawson, Aaron & Cho, Eun (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory VII (SALT VII), 276–293. Ithaca, New York: CLC Publications.
Ramchand, Gillian C. 1997. Aspect and Predication: The Semantics of Argument Structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ramchand, Gillian C. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First-Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ramchand, Gillian C. & Svenonius, Peter. 2008. Mapping a parochial lexicon onto a universal semantics. In Biberauer, Theresa (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, 219–245. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 1998. Building verb meanings. In Butt, Miriam & Geuder, Wilhem (eds.), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, 97–134. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 2001. An Event Structure Account of English Resultatives. Language 77: 766–797.
Reinhart, Tanya 2002. The Theta System: An Overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229–290.
Rothstein, Susan. 2004. Structuring Events: An Essay on the Semantics of Lexical Aspect. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rothstein, Susan. 2008. Two puzzles for a theory of lexical aspect: semelfactives and degree achievements. In Dölling, Johannes & Heyde-Zybatow, Tatjana & Schäfer, Martin (eds.), Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation, 175–198. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Smith, Carlota. 1997 [1991]. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Soh, Hooi Ling & Kuo, Jenny Yi-Chun. 2005. Perfective Aspect and Accomplishment Situations in Mandarin Chinese. In van Hout, Angeliek & de Swart, Henriette & Verkuyl, Henk (eds.), Perspectives on Aspect, 199–216. Dordrecht: Springer.
Son, Minjeong & Svenonius, Peter. 2008. Microparameters of cross-linguistic variation: Directed motion and resultatives. In Abner, Natasha & Bishop, Jason (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 388–396. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla
Steffen Chung, Karen. 2006. Mandarin Compound Verbs. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
Svenonius, Peter. 2010. Spatial P in English. In Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi (eds.), The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 6, 127–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sybesma, Rint P.E. 1997. Why Chinese verb-le is a resultative predicate. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6(3). 215–261.
Sybesma, Rint P.E. 1999. The Mandarin VP. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Sybesma, Rint P.E. 2017. Aspect, Inner. In Sybesma, Rint & Behr, Wolfgang & Gu, Yueguo & Handel, Zev & Huang, C.-T. James & Myers, James (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, vol. 1, 186–193. Leiden: Brill.
Tai, James. 1984. Verbs and Times in Chinese: Vendler’s Four Categories. In Testen, David & Mishra, Veena & Drogo, Joseph (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 289–296.
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a Cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Tenny, Carol. 2000. Core Events and Adverbial Modification. In Tenny, Carol & Pustejovsky, James (eds.), Events as Grammatical Objects, 285–334. Standford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Tham, Shiao-Wei. 2009. Building resultatives in Mandarin (from the result). (Paper presented at Tenth Stanford Semantic Fest, Standford: Stanford University, 14 March 2009, http://www.wellesley.edu/sites/default/files/assets/departments/eall/files/stham-semfest10.pdf, accessed 19 July 2017).
Tham, Shiao-Wei. 2013. Change of state verbs and result state adjectives in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Linguistics 49(3). 647–701.
Travis, Lisa. 2000. Event structure in syntax. In Tenny, Carol & Pustejovsky, James (eds.), Events as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax, 145–185. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Travis, Lisa. 2010. Inner aspect: the articulation of VP. Dordrecht: Springer.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2001. Tense anchoring in Chinese. Lingua 118. 675–686.
Tsao, Feng-Fu. 2004. Semantics and Syntax of Verbal and Adjectival Reduplication in Mandarin and Taiwanese Southern Min. In Chappell, Hilary (ed.), Sinitic grammar: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives, 285–308. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wang, Yuan (王媛). 2011. Xiàndài Hànyǔ dòngjiéshì de jìnxíngtǐ (现代汉语动结式的进行体) [The progressive of RVCs in Mandarin Chinese]. Yǔyán kēxué (语言科学) 10(1). 70–82.
Washio, Ryuichi. 1997. Resultatives, compositionality and language variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6. 1–49.
Wechsler, Stephen. 1997. Resultative predicates and control. In Blight, Ralph C. & Moosally, Michelle (eds.), Texas Linguistic Forum 38: The syntax and semantics of predication, 307–321. Austin: University of Texas Department of Linguistics.
Wechsler, Stephen. 2005a. Resultatives under the ‘event-argument homomorphism’ model of telicity. In Erteschik-Shir, Nomi & Rappoport, Tova (eds.), The Syntax of Aspect, 255–273. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wechsler, Stephen. 2005b. Weighing in on scales: A reply to Goldberg and Jackendoff. Language 81(2). 465–473.
Wellwood, Alexis. 2015. On the semantics of comparison across categories. Linguistics and Philosophy 38(1). 67–101.
Xiao, Richard & McEnery, Richard. 2004. Aspect in Mandarin Chinese: A Corpus-based Study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Xie, Zhengming (解正明). 2008. Qīng dòngcí jiǎshuō yǔ cídiǎn shìyì (轻动词假说与词典释义) [The light verb hypothesis and dictionary definitions]. Císhū yánjiū (辞书研究) 4. 30–44.
Xu, Dan. 2006. Typological Change in Chinese Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Xue, Changming. 2007. L2 Acquisition of Chinese Unaccusative Verbs by English-speaking Learners. Beijing: Kexue Chubanshe.
Yang, Suying (杨素英). 1999. Cóng fēibīngé dòngcí xiànxiàng kàn yǔyì yǔ jùfǎ jiégòu zhījiān de guānxi (从非宾格动词现象看语义与句法结构之间的关系) [The unaccusativity phenomenon: A study on the relationship between semantics and syntax]. Dāngdài yǔyánxué (当代语言学) 1. 30–43.
Yong, Shin. 1997. The grammatical functions of verb complements in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 35. 1–24.
Zhang, Guoxian (张国宪). 2006. Xiàndài Hànyǔ xíngróngcí (现代汉语形容词) [Modern Chinese adjectives]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan Chubanse.
Zhu, Xingfan (朱行帆). 2005. Qīng dòngcí hé Hànyǔ bùjíwù dòngcí dài bīnyǔ xiànxiàng (轻动词和汉语不及物动词带宾语现象) [Light verbs and the phenomenon of Chinese intransitive verbs bearing an object]. Xiàndài wàiyǔ (现代外语) 28(3). 221–231.
Hànyǔ dòngcí yòngfǎ cídiǎn (汉语动词用法词典) [A usage dictionary of Chinese verbs]. 1999. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan Chubanshe.
Hànyǔ xíngróngcí yòngfǎ cídiǎn 汉语形容词用法词典 [A usage dictionary of Chinese adjectives]. 2003. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan Chubanshe.
Xiàndài Hànyǔ cídiǎn 现代汉语词典—The Contemporary Chinese Dictionary (Chinese-English edition). 2002. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1005 | 215 | 21 |
Full Text Views | 56 | 8 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 87 | 15 | 0 |
It has been observed that Chinese resultative compounds display varied aspectual behaviors. Yong (1997) distinguishes between simple change resultatives, i.e. resultatives expressing instantaneous change, but allowing a process preliminary to the final change, and complex change resultatives, i.e. those allowing a gradual development of action. Starting from this distinction, this paper aims at providing a structural account of these resultative compounds, based on the constructionist framework put forth by Ramchand (2008), arguing that only simple change resultatives are characterized by having a result layer in their eventive structure. Complex change resultatives, in contrast, are characterized by having the result element in the complement position of the process projection, providing a scalar path. This allows a gradual change of state, and telicity emerges when the path is bounded. The paper also discusses the relation between complex change resultatives and degree achievements.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1005 | 215 | 21 |
Full Text Views | 56 | 8 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 87 | 15 | 0 |