From Marrakesh to Glasgow: Looking Backward to Move Forward on Emissions Trading
In: Climate LawSearch for other papers by Lisa Benjamin in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by David A. Wirth in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The Paris Rulebook—nearly complete, but with the ‘markets’ text tied to Article 6 of the Paris Agreement unadopted after nearly three years—invites comparison with a similar effort under the Kyoto Protocol: the Marrakesh Accords. This article compares the Paris Rulebook and the 2001 Marrakesh Accords implementing the Kyoto Protocol as a way of exploring the similarities and differences in regulatory design between the two sub-regimes and their implications for sustainability and climate integrity. An in-depth analysis of the negotiating history and the text of the two instruments yields trenchant and perhaps unexpected conclusions. Issues that plagued the Marrakesh Accords also appear in similar form in the Paris Rulebook discussions around Article 6; however, because of the difference in structure between the two treaties, even more complex issues have arisen in the Rulebook negotiations. The article reflects on the fundamentally different purpose of the ‘markets’ text in the Rulebook in comparison with its Kyoto/Marrakesh precursor, as well as on the implications of those differences for the Article 6 negotiations.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 648 | 119 | 21 |
| Full Text Views | 121 | 8 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 286 | 20 | 12 |
From Marrakesh to Glasgow: Looking Backward to Move Forward on Emissions Trading
In: Climate LawSearch for other papers by Lisa Benjamin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David A. Wirth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The Paris Rulebook—nearly complete, but with the ‘markets’ text tied to Article 6 of the Paris Agreement unadopted after nearly three years—invites comparison with a similar effort under the Kyoto Protocol: the Marrakesh Accords. This article compares the Paris Rulebook and the 2001 Marrakesh Accords implementing the Kyoto Protocol as a way of exploring the similarities and differences in regulatory design between the two sub-regimes and their implications for sustainability and climate integrity. An in-depth analysis of the negotiating history and the text of the two instruments yields trenchant and perhaps unexpected conclusions. Issues that plagued the Marrakesh Accords also appear in similar form in the Paris Rulebook discussions around Article 6; however, because of the difference in structure between the two treaties, even more complex issues have arisen in the Rulebook negotiations. The article reflects on the fundamentally different purpose of the ‘markets’ text in the Rulebook in comparison with its Kyoto/Marrakesh precursor, as well as on the implications of those differences for the Article 6 negotiations.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 648 | 119 | 21 |
| Full Text Views | 121 | 8 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 286 | 20 | 12 |