Introduction to the Special Issue: Climate Engineering Law
In: Climate LawSearch for other papers by William C. G. Burns in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Simon Nicholson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
2
Mason Inman, ‘Planning for Plan B’, Nature Reports Climate Change, 17 December 2009, <www.nature.com/climate/2010/1001/full/climate.2010.135.html>. Note that the ‘Plan B’ framing, though widely used, is an erroneous one. Climate engineering technologies do not offer a new pathway of response to climate change that would somehow be entirely distinct from mitigation and adaptation activities. srm, in particular, would only make sense as a strategy if it were paired with efforts to reduce atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases. Rather than thinking of climate engineering as some kind of Plan B, it makes far more sense to consider whether or not climate engineering technologies offer meaningful ways to augment Plan A. See Simon Nicholson, ‘Reimagining Climate Engineering: The Politics of Tinkering with the Sky’, in Paul Wapner and Hilal Elver (eds), Reimagining Climate Change (Routledge, forthcoming 2016).
-
4
This issue, p. 141.
-
5
This issue, p. 145.
-
6
This issue, p. 185.
-
7
This issue, p. 217.
-
9
This issue, p. 300.
Introduction to the Special Issue: Climate Engineering Law
In: Climate LawSearch for other papers by William C. G. Burns in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simon Nicholson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
