International eia Law and Geoengineering: Do Emerging Technologies Require Special Rules?

Climate Law
著者: Neil Craik 1
浏览更多 浏览更少
  • 1 University of Waterloo

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€ 25.00$ 30.00

This article explores the adequacy of the international rules on environmental impact assessment to contribute to geoengineering governance, with a focus on three fundamental challenges. First, the near-universal trigger for eia is the likelihood of significant environmental impact, which may prove to be insufficiently precautionary in light of current risk preferences surrounding geoengineering. Second, the scope of eia has traditionally focused narrowly on the assessment of direct physical impacts; however, many of the concerns that geoengineering research raises relate to environmental and social risks associated with downstream technological implications. A third and related challenge is the consultation requirements under eia laws, which focus on affected states and affected members of the public. Because many geoengineering activities are anticipated to impact the global commons, there is no clear institutional mechanism for implementing notification and consultation. Additionally, the broader sets of concerns that geoengineering raises are spatially unbounded, again making the identification of consultation partners uncertain. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of the challenges and limitations of the rules of eia for geoengineering.

  • 3

    J. Holder, Environmental Assessment: The Regulation of Decision Making (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004); C. Wood, Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review (Harlow, uk: Prentice Hall, 2003).

    • 检索谷歌学术
    • 导出引用
  • 78

     See Craik, supra note 7, at 145.


全部期间 过去一年 过去30天
摘要浏览次数 141 50 4
全文浏览次数 228 10 0
PDF下载次数 27 6 0