Legal Form and Nature of the Paris Outcome

In: Climate Law
Sebastian Oberthür Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Institute for European Studies,

Search for other papers by Sebastian Oberthür in
Current site
Google Scholar
Ralph Bodle Ecologic Institute, Berlin,

Search for other papers by Ralph Bodle in
Current site
Google Scholar
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


This article analyses the legal form and nature of the Paris Agreement by exploring five core issues: (1) the status of the Paris Agreement as an instrument of international law; (2) the ‘housing’ of mitigation plans, actions, and targets within or outside the treaty; (3) the prescriptiveness and precision of the wording of specific commitments and provisions; (4) the nature of the commitments, in particular result versus conduct; and (5) the provisions to ensure accountability and promote effective implementation. We argue that the Paris Agreement constitutes an international treaty whose prescriptive and precise legal obligations are primarily procedural and focused on ‘nationally determined contributions’ (on mitigation) and the core transparency framework. Many other less precise and prescriptive obligations and provisions, including a number of rather programmatic statements, are best understood as establishing a political narrative that aims to guide the implementation and future evolution of the Agreement.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1855 304 42
Full Text Views 676 53 5
PDF Views & Downloads 624 104 8