Save

Lawmaking in China: Understanding Substantive and Procedural Changes

In: China Law and Society Review
Authors:
Benjamin van Rooij University of California, Irvine, bvanrooij@law.uci.edu

Search for other papers by Benjamin van Rooij in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Annemieke van den Dool University of Amsterdam, A.vandenDool@uva.nl

Search for other papers by Annemieke van den Dool in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

This paper provides a sociolegal overview of law and lawmaking in China. It combines existing studies with original data published by the National People’s Congress as well as new case studies of recent lawmaking processes. The paper focuses its analysis on the development of regulatory laws that seek to prevent and control risk, including environmental, food safety, land, labor, and occupational health laws. The paper finds large changes in the substance of legislation over the past two decades. Amid generally massive growth in lawmaking at all levels, national legislation has become more ambitious, with a greater regulatory burden. It has become more specific, allowing for less discretion. And it has grown stronger teeth, with greater sanctions against violations. These regulatory laws allow for more public participation, albeit within a tightly confined authoritarian space. Such substantive changes come as the process of lawmaking has evolved. While central leadership retains strong control over lawmaking, the process has become more transparent, allowing more actors to exert influence. Successful legislative entrepreneurs are able to shape lawmaking by timing their advocacy at the right stage of the legislative process and, if possible, linking it to ongoing crises.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2435 256 28
Full Text Views 309 4 0
PDF Views & Downloads 112 10 0