Politics has shaped the operation of the Chinese courts as well as their decision-making processes. This article surveys mostly empirical studies on the relationship between the courts and politics. It covers topics such as judicial independence, local protectionism, judicial mediation, judicial innovation, judicial reforms, and people’s attitudes toward the courts. It provides a clue to understand the trajectory of the Chinese courts, the legal system, and the relationship between law and society in general.
ClarkeDonald. 2014. Judicial innovation in Chinese corporate law. In Legal Innovation in Asia: Judicial Lawmaking and the Influence of Comparative Law ed. HaleyJohn O. and OrthweinWilliam R.259–72. Northampton ma: Edward Elgar.
FanYu.2005. Fayuan tiaojie zhidu de shizhengxing yanjiu [An empirical study on the system of judicial mediation]. In Falü chengxu yunzuo de shizheng fenxi [An Empirical Analysis on the Practice of Legal Procedures] ed. WangYaxin et al. 199–262. Beijing: Falü chubanshe.
FuHualing and CullenRichard. 2011. Mediatory to adjudicatory justice: The limits of civil justice reform in China. In Chinese Justice: Civil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China ed. WooM. and GallagherM.25–57. New York: Cambridge University Press.
FuYulin and PeerenboomRandall. 2010. A new analytical framework for understanding and promoting judicial independence in China. In Judicial Independence in China: Lessons for Global Rule of Law Promotion ed. PeerenboomRandall95–133. New York: Cambridge University Press.
GallagherMary E. and WangYuhua. 2011. Users and non-users: Legal experience and its effect on legal consciousness. In Chinese Justice: Civil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China ed. WooMargaret Y.K. and GallagherMary E.204–33. New York: Cambridge University Press.
GinsburgTom. 2008. Administrative law and judicial control of agents in authoritarian regimes. In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes ed. GinsburgTom and MoustafaTamir58–72. Cambridge uk: Cambridge University Press.
GinsburgTom. 2010. Judicial independence in East Asia: Lessons for China. In Judicial Independence in China: Lessons for Global Rule of Law Promotion ed. PeerenboomRandall247–259. New York: Cambridge University Press.
HeXin. 2009d. Administrative law as a political control mechanism in contemporary China. In Building Constitutionalism in China ed. BalmeStephanie and DowdleMichael143–61. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
HowsonNicholas. 2010. Judicial independence and company law in the Shanghai Courts. In Judicial Independence in China: Lessons for Global Rule of Law Promotion ed. PeerenboomRandall134–53. New York: Cambridge University Press.
LandryPierre. 2008. The institutional diffusion of courts in China: Evidence from survey data. In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes ed. GinsburgTom and MoustafaTamir207–34. Cambridge uk: Cambridge University Press.
LiYedanKockenJoris and Van RooijBenjamin. 2016. Understanding China’s court mediation surge: Insights from a local court. Law & Social Inquiry. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lsi.12234/full. Accessed October 2017.
LiYufeng. 2015. Sifa guocheng de zhengzhi yueshu: woguo jiceng renmin fayuan shenpan weiyuanhui yunxing yanjiu [Political constraint of judicial process: A research on the Adjudication Committee of a Chinese basic-level people’s court]. Faxuejia [Legal Scholars]1:1–18.
LiebmanBenjamin. 2012. Professional and populists: The paradoxes of China’s legal reform. In China: In and Beyond the Headlines ed. WestonTimothy B. and JensenLionel M.214–30. Lanham md: Rowman & Littlefield.
MichelsonEthan and ReadBenjamin. 2011. Public attitudes toward official justice in Beijing and rural China. In Chinese Justice: Civil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China ed. WooMargaret Y.K. and GallagherMary E.169–203. New York: Cambridge University Press.
MinznerCarl. 2011b. Judicial disciplinary system for incorrectly decided cases: The imperial Chinese heritage lives on. In Chinese Justice: Civil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China ed. WooMargaret Y.K. and GallagherMary E.58–90. New York: Cambridge University Press.
PalmerMichael. 2010. Compromising courts and harmonizing ideologies: Mediation in the administrative chambers of the people’s courts of the People’s Republic of China. In New Courts in Asia ed. HardingAndrew and NicholsonPenelope251–76. New York: Routledge.
PeiMinxinZhangGuoyanPeiFei and ChenLixin. 2010. A survey of commercial litigation in Shanghai courts. In Judicial Independence in China: Lessons for Global Rules of Law Promotion ed. PeerenboomRandall221–33. New York: Cambridge University Press.
PotterPitman B.2002. Guanxi and the prc legal system. In Social Connections in China: Institutions Culture and the Changing Nature of Guanxi ed. GoldThomasGuthrieDoug and WankDavid179–96. Cambridge uk: Cambridge University Press.
RosenzweigJoshuaSapioFloraJueJiangBiaoTeng and PilsEva. 2012. Comments on the 2012 revision of the Chinese criminal procedure law. In Comparative Perspectives on Criminal Justice in China ed. McConvilleMike and PilsEva455–503. Cheltenham uk: Edward Elgar.
WangLusheng. 2015. Xiangma yu saima: Zhongguo churen faguan xuanren jizhi shizheng yanjiu [Horse-picking and horse-racing: An empirical study on the appointment mechanism of judges in China]. Fazhi yu shehui fazhan [Rule of Law and Social Development]21 no. 2:41–53.
WangLungang and LiuSida. 2015. Cong shiti wenze dao chengxu zhizhi – Zhongguo fayuan cuoan zhuijiu zhidu de shizheng kaocha [From substantive responsibility to the rule of procedure: An empirical study of the operation of the incorrect case responsibility system in China]. Faxuejia2:27–40.
XianYifan. 2015. Grassroots judges of China in the resurgence from adjudicatory to mediatory justice: Transformation of roles and inherent conflict of identities. Journal of Comparative Law10 no. 2:126–41.
YuXiaohong. 2012Rule of law under (fragmented) authoritarianism: Explaining the expansion of judicial power in authoritarian China. Paper presented at the annual meeting of apsa. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2105036/. Accessed November 2016.
ZengHui and WangZheng. 2007. Kunjing zhong de peishen zhidu: “Fayuan xuyao” longzhao xia de peishen zhidu jiedu [People’s assessor system with problems: The people’s assessor system covered by “the elementary court’s needs”]. Beida falü pinglun1:39–61.