Made in China: Chinese Re-Conceptualization of the Ideal of Judicial Independence (1906–1937)
In: China Law and Society ReviewSearch for other papers by Guanhong Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Judicial independence has always been an important theme of China’s judicial reforms, both historically and in recent years. This article sheds light on how Chinese elites and intellectuals created a unique concept of judicial independence in the context of early twentieth-century China, seeking to trace the historical roots of the ongoing judicial reform in the People’s Republic. This uniqueness was characterized by three features: the heterogeneity within the Chinese conception of judicial independence, the reinterpretation of judicial independence into a tool for reinforcing China’s sovereignty, and the applauded control over courts and judges. These features resulted from the inherent tension within China’s pursuit of a modern state. By examining the early discourse and reform efforts, this paper not only highlights the historical struggles for judicial independence, but also, it contributes to understanding contemporary China’s distinctive path in judicial modernization, deviating from liberal constitutionalism.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
An, Guosheng. 2014. Waiguo zaihua lingshi caipanquan shigao [History of Extraterritoriality in China]. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.
-
Backer, Larry. 2017. “Between the Judge and the Law: Judicial Independence and Authority with Chinese Characteristics.” Connecticut Journal of International Law 33(1): 1–42.
-
Beiyang Government. 1914. Zhengfu gongbao [Government Gazette] 637.
-
Beiyang Government. 1915. Zhengfu gongbao [Government Gazette] 961.
-
Burbank, Stephen. 1999. “The Architecture of Judicial Independence.” Southern California Law Review 72(2 & 3): 315–52.
-
Chen Bao. 1925. “Feng yuxiang zhi zhuangyu [Feng Yuxiang’s Grandiloquence].” June 13.
-
Commission on Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in China. 1926. Report of the Commission on Extraterritoriality in China. Washington: Government Printing Office. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.$b47432&seq=95 (accessed March 25, 2024).
-
Constitution of the Republic of China (1914) (Yuan’s Constitution). 2004. In Jindai zhongguo xianzheng licheng: shiliao huicui [History of Constitutional Movements in Modern China: Collection of Historical Materials], edited by Xinhua Xia, 471–76. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.
-
Constitution of the Republic of China (1923). 2004. In Jindai zhongguo xianzheng licheng: shiliao huicui [History of Constitutional Movements in Modern China: Collection of Historical Materials], edited by Xinhua Xia, 521–31. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.
-
Courts Organization Law (1910). 2010. In Qingmo fazhi biange shiliao (shangce) [Collection of Historical Archives on Legal-Judicial Reform of Late Qingi], edited by Xiaofeng Huai, 492–502. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.
-
Cox, Archibald. 1996. “The Independence of the Judiciary: History and Purposes Symposium: International Law and Judicial Autonomy.” University of Dayton Law Review 21(3): 565–84.
-
Criminal-Civil Procedural Law (1906). 2010. In Qingmo fazhi biange shiliao (shangce) [Collection of Historical Archives on Legal-Judicial Reform of Late Qingi], edited by Xiaofeng Huai, 436–54. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.
-
Dashou. [1908] 1979. “Kaocha xianzheng dachen Dashou zou kaocha riben xianzheng qingxing zhe [Dashou’s Report on Japan’s Constitutional Institutions].” In Qingmo choubei lixian dangan shiliao [Collection of Historical Archives on Constitution-Preparation Movement of Late Qing], edited by Palace Museum, 25–41. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
-
Dongfang Zazhi. 1925. “Zhongyao handian huilu [Significant Telegrams].” Dongfang Zazhi 22(special issue): 9–10.
-
Fan, Xianfang. 1916. “Fakan ci [Foreword].” Sifa Yuebao 1: 1–5.
-
Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judicial Independence.” Southern California Law Review 72(2 & 3): 353–84.
-
Fukuang. 1923. “Luoan shimo ji shangbian [The Process and Result of Luo Wengan’s case i].” Huzhu 1(1): 1–52.
-
Gerber, Scott. 2011. A Distinct Judicial Power: The Origins of an Independent Judiciary, 1606–1787. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Guangxu. [1906] 1979. “Xuanshi yubei lixian xianxing liding guanzhi yu [Royal Announcement of Constitutional Preparation and the Reform of the Official System].” In Qingmo choubei lixian dangan shiliao [Collection of Historical Archives on Constitution-Preparation Movement of Late Qing], edited by Palace Museum, 43–44. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
-
Guo, Zhixiang. 2002. “Qingmo he minguo shiqi de sifa duli yanjiu (xia) [Judicial Independence in the Late Qing and Republican Periods ii].” Global Law Review 2: 203–16.
-
Han, Dayuan. 2016. “Lun 1954 nian xianfa shang de shenpan duli yuanze [On the Principle of Independent Trial in the 1954 Constitution].” China Legal Science 5: 5–24.
-
He, Xin. 2021. “Pressures on Chinese Judges under Xi.” The China Journal 85: 49–74.
-
Hong, Jiaqi. 2016. “Qingmo susongfa gaige zhengyi zhi tantao—yi susongfa boyi buju wei kaocha zhongxin [A Discussion on the Dispute of Litigation Law Reform in the Late Qing Dynasty—Based on Procedural Law in the Department Refutation].” Journal of Hangzhou Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences) 38(1): 16–23.
-
Hu, Yuzhi. 1925. “Wusha shijian jishi [Records of the May 30th Incident].” Dongfang Zazhi 22(special issue): 1–34.
-
International Association of Judicial Independence and World Peace. 2008. Mount Scopus International Standards of Judicial Independence. https://www.jiwp.org/mt-scopus-standards (accessed July 21, 2022).
-
Jiang, Zhaoxin. 2017. “Consequential Court and Judicial Leadership: The Unwritten Republican Judicial Tradition in China.” In Chinese Legal Reform and the Global Legal Order: Adoption and Adaptation, edited by Michael Ng and Yun Zhao. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 278–98.
-
Ju, Zheng. 1937. “Shinianlai zhi sifa jianshe [Judiciary-Building in the Past Decade].” Zhongshan Zhoubao 128: 9–11.
-
Kaufman, Irving. 1980. “The Essence of Judicial Independence.” Columbia Law Review 80(4): 671–701.
-
Legal Daily. 2023. Zhangjun yu xianggang faguan ji sifa renyuan neidi jiaoliu fangwentuan zuotan jiaoliu zhichu: wei zhongguo tese shehuizhuyi sifa zhidu wanshan jiexu fendou [Continuously Fighting for the Improvement of the Socialist Judicial System with Chinese Characteristics: Zhang Jun Pointed Out when Exchanging Ideas with Hong Kong Judges and Judicial Staff]. http://www.legaldaily.com.cn/Personnel_matters/content/2023-10/31/content_8923308.html (accessed November 20, 2023).
-
Li, Guilian. 2018. Shen jiaben zhuan [Biography of Shen Jiaben]. Guangxi: Guangxi Normal University Press.
-
Li, Yumin. 2005. Zhongguo feiyue shi [China’s effort to abolish unequal treaties]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
-
Li, Zaiquan. 2012. Fazhi yu dangzhi: guomindang zhengquan de sifa danghua (1923–1948) [Rule of Law vs. Rule of Party: the Party-ization of the Guomindang Regime’s Judiciary, 1923–1948]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
-
Liang, Qichao. 1902. “Falixue dajia mengdesijiu zhi xueshuo (xuqian) [The Theory of Montesquieu ii].” Xinmin Congbao 5: 13–21.
-
Liang, Qichao. 1913. “Zhengfu dazheng fangzhen xuanyan [Declaration of the Government’s Fundamental Policies]” Dongfang Zazhi 10(6): 23–32.
-
Lou, Xingbang. 1930. “Zhongguo sifa duli wenti de wojian (xu) [My Opinion on the Issue of Judicial Independence in China].” Xinsheng Yuekan 24: 24–27.
-
Luo, Wengan. 1924. “Shenshou sifa zhi ziwei [The Experience in Jail].” Chen Bao Sixth Anniversary Special Issue, 14–23.
-
Ma, Jianzhong. [1878] 1966. “Shang Li boxiang yan chuyang gongke shu [Report about My Study in the West Submitted to Li Hongzhang].” In Shikezhai jiyan jixing [Discourse and Behaviors of Ma Jianzhong], by Jianzhong Ma, 72–82. Taipei: Wenhai Press.
-
Minguo Ribao. 1927. “Zhiguan yichanan faguan lvshi da bianlun [The Debate between the Judge and Lawyers over Inheritance Disposal].” May 8, 1927.
-
Minguo Ribao. 1929. “Wu chaoshu boshi zaimei yanshuo [Dr. Wu Chaoshu Delivered a Speech in the United States].” May 6.
-
Minguo Ribao (Shanghai). 1925. “Bo Liang rengong yingfu shanghai canshaan taidu [To Refute Liang Qichao’s Attitude towards the Massacre Happening in Shanghai].” June 14.
-
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 1926a. “Zhuanjian [Special Documents].” In the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 1926. Waijiao gongbao [Foreign Affairs Gazette] 55.
-
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 1926b. “Zhuanjian [Special Documents].” In the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 1926. Waijiao gongbao [Foreign Affairs Gazette] 65.
-
Ministry of Justice. 1912. Sifa gongbao [Judicial Gazette] 3.
-
Ministry of Justice. 1915. Sifa gongbao [Judicial Gazette] 49.
-
Nie, Xin. 2009. “Cong sanfasi dao sifayuan—zhongguo zhongyang sifa chuantong de duanlie yu yanxu [From Three-Agency-Structure to Judicial Yuan: Discontinuity and Continuity of China’s Judicial Tradition at the Central Level].” Tribune of Political Science and Law 27(1): 40–48.
-
Peking University Daily. 1923a. “Cai xiaozhang cizhi chengwen [Principal Cai’s Resignation].” January 19.
-
Peking University Daily. 1923b. “Beijing guoli zhuanmen yishang baxiao jiaozhiyuan daibiao lianxi huiyi xuanyan [Joint Declaration of Representatives of Beijing’s Eight National Universities and Colleges’ Staff].” January 23.
-
People’s Court Daily. 2017. “Rang shenlizhe caipan, rang caipanzhe fuze—shibada yilai renmin fayuan sifa gaige gongzuo shuping [Letting Adjudicators Judge, but Holding Those Who Adjudicate Responsible: A Review of the Judicial Reform after 2012].” October 18.
-
Shanghai High People’s Court. 2023. Jianchi zhongguo tese shehuizhuyi sifa zhidu jianding zhidu zixin zhutui zhongguo zhi zhi [Adhere to the Socialist Judicial System with Chinese Characteristics, and Firmly Boost the Chinese Way of Governance with Confidence in the System]. https://www.hshfy.sh.cn/shfy/web/channel_tp_view.jsp?pa=aaWQ9MzMxOTA2NgPdcssPdcssz&zd=xwzx (accessed November 20, 2023).
-
Shen Bao. 1907. “Daliyuanzheng shen jiaben zouchen riben caipan jianyu qingxing zhe [The Head of Daliyuan Shen Jiaben Submitted a Memorial to the Emperor to Introduce the Prison System of Japan].” June 6.
-
Shen Bao. 1922a. “Luoan zhi gefang xiaoxi [News about Luo Wengan’s case].” November 24.
-
Shen Bao. 1922b. “Luoan zhi jinxing yu xiaomie [Process of Luo Wengan’s case].” November 24.
-
Shen Bao. 1922c. “Dongkang zaiying zhi tanhua [Dong Kang’s Talk in Britain].” December 1.
-
Shen Bao. 1923a. “Dongkang zai lundun zhi tanpian [Dong Kang’s Talk in London].” January 16.
-
Shen Bao. 1923b. “Luoan fengchao qiandong jiaoyujie [Luo Wengan’s Case Involves Education].” January 21.
-
Shen Bao. 1923c. “Cai yuanpei xuanbu cizhi zhenxiang [The Truth about Cai Yuanpei’s Resignation].” January 25.
-
Shen Bao. 1923d. “Sifajie dui luoan zhi nuchao [The Judicial Profession Raged against Luo Wengan’s case].” February 4.
-
Shen Bao. 1923e. “Dongsheng fayuan fandui luoan zaiyi [The Harbin Special Court Objected to Re-investigation of Luo Wengan’s Case].” February 21.
-
Shen Bao. 1923f. “Sifaguan goutong lvshi zuobi zhi chufen [Punishment of Judges Colluding with Lawyers].” August 9.
-
Shen, Jiaben. [1905] 2015. “Caipansuo fangwenlu xu [Preface to the Visit to Japanese Courts].” In Jiyi wencun [Works of Shen Jiaben], by Jiaben Shen, 204–07. Beijing: Commercial Press.
-
Shen, Jiaben. [1906] 2010. “Xiuding falv dachen Shen Jiaben deng zou Jincheng susongfa niqing xianxing shiban zhe [Shen Jiaben’s Advice to Experiment with the Procedural Law].” In Qingmo fazhi biange shiliao (shangce) [Collection of Historical Archives on Legal-Judicial Reform of Late Qingi], edited by Xiaofeng Huai, 385–86. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.
-
Shen, Zhihua. 2007. Zhongsu guanxi shigang [Sino-Soviet Relations History]. Beijing: Xinhua Publishing House.
-
Shi Bao. 1907a. “Bo edu lun sifa duli zhi hai [Contradicting Hubei Governor’s Statement of Harm of Judicial Independence].” February 22.
-
Shi Bao. 1907b. “Bo edu lun sifa duli zhi hai (xu) [Contradicting Hubei Governor’s Statement of Harm of Judicial Independence ii].” February 23.
-
Shi Bao. 1907c. “Bo edu lun sifa duli zhi hai (xu) [Contradicting Hubei Governor’s Statement of Harm of Judicial Independence iii.” February 24.
-
Shi Bao. 1907d. “Zai bo edu lun sifa duli zhi hai [Contradicting Hubei Governor’s Statement of Harm of Judicial Independence Once More].” February 25.
-
Shi Bao. 1907e. “Zai bo edu lun sifa duli zhi hai (xu) [Contradicting Hubei Governor’s Statement of Harm of Judicial Independence Once More ii].” February 26.
-
Shi, Yuanhua. 1994. Zhonghua minguo waijiao shi [History of Foreign Affairs of Republic of China]. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.
-
Shuntian Shibao. 1923. “Cai yuanpei xiaozhang zhi cizhi [The Resignation of Principal Cai Yuanpei].” January 19.
-
Sun, Xiaolou. 1935. “Gaijin woguo sifa de genben wenti [Fundamental Issues of China’s Judicial Reform]” Faxue Zazhi (Shanghai) 8(4): 149–62.
-
Supreme People’s Court. 2017a. Liangjian sifa duli youfa keyi [Drawing the Sword Against Western ‘Judicial Independence’: Grounded in Law]. The Paper News. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1601262 (accessed March 27, 2024).
-
Supreme People’s Court. 2017b. Xifang xianzheng minzhu he sifa duli bukeneng zai zhongguo shengcun [Western Constitutional Democracy and Judicial Independence: Unviable in China]. The Paper News. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1601259 (accessed March 27, 2024).
-
Supreme People’s Court. 2017c. Yifa duli xingshi shenpanquan budengyu xifang sifa duli [Independent Adjudication According to Law: Distinct from Western ‘Judicial Independence’]. The Paper News. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1601260 (accessed March 27, 2024).
-
Supreme People’s Court. 2017d. Yixieren guchui de sifa duli touhuan gainian jiadai zhengzhi sihuo [The ‘Judicial Independence’ Promoted by Some Conceals a Switch in Concept and Carries Political Ulterior Motives]. The Paper News. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1601258 (accessed March 27, 2024).
-
Supreme People’s Court. 2017e. Zhongguo de duli xingshi shenpanquan shi dang lingdao xia de duli [China’s Independent Exercise of Judicial Power: ‘Independence’ Under Party Leadership]. The Paper News. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1601261 (accessed March 27, 2024).
-
The Seventh United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders. 1985. Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/independencejudiciary.aspx (accessed July 21, 2022).
-
Tiffert, Glenn. 2013. “An Irresistible Inheritance: Republican Judicial Modernization and Its Legacies to the People’s Republic of China.” Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review 1(7): 84–112.
-
Tiffert, Glenn. 2015. “Judging Revolution: Beijing and the Birth of the prc Judicial System (1906–1958).” Ph.D., University of California, Berkeley.
-
Wagner, Richard. 2009. “Alternatives to Magistrate Justice: Merchant Guild Dispute Resolution and the Foreign Trader Driven Litigation and Arbitration Reforms of Late Imperial and Early Republican China.” Journal of Comparative Law 4(2): 257–90.
-
Wang, Chonghui. 1929. “Jinhou sifa gailiang zhi fangzhen [Guiding Principles Governing Judicial Reforms in the Future].” Zhongyang Zhoubao (special issue), 21–24.
-
Wang, Ke. 2020. Yishi yiyou yidi: minzu zhuyi yu jindai zhongri guanxi [Mentorship, Friends, and Foes: Nationalism and Modern Sino-Japanese Relations]. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.
-
Xi, Jinping. 2022. Jianchi zou zhongguo tese shehuizhuyi fazhi daolu genghao tuijin zhongguo tese shehuizhuyi fazhi tixi jianshe [Persist in Following the Path of Socialist Rule of Law with Chinese Characteristics, to Better Advance the Construction of the Socialist Legal System with Chinese Characteristics]. Qiushi. http://www.qstheory.cn/dukan/qs/2022-02/15/c_1128367893.htm (accessed March 25, 2024).
-
Xinwen Bao. 1913. “Xinping er [Latest Remarks ii].” February 17.
-
Xinwen Bao. 1915a. “Xinping er [Latest Remarks ii].” August 6.
-
Xinwen Bao. 1915b. “Xinping er [Latest Remarks ii].” October 11.
-
Xinwen Bao. 1935. “Sifa duli zhi zhongyaoxing [Significance of Judicial Independence].” July 30.
-
Xu, Xiaoqun. 1997. “The Fate of Judicial Independence in Republican China, 1912–37.” The China Quarterly 149: 1–28.
-
Xu, Xiaoqun. 2008. Trial of Modernity: Judicial Reform in Early Twentieth-Century China, 1901–1937. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
Xu, Xiaoqun. 2018. “Law, Custom, and Social Norms: Civil Adjudications in Qing and Republican China.” Law and History Review 36(1): 77–104.
-
Yang, Tianhong. 2018. Fazheng jiujie: beiyang zhengfu shiqi luo wengan an de gaosu yu shenduan [The Dispute over Politics and Law: the Prosecution and Trial of Luo Wengan in the Beiyang Period]. Guangxi: Guangxi Normal University Press.
-
Yanlingshuzi. 1934. “Sifa duli [Judicial Independence].” Waibu Zhoukan 34: 56.
-
Yaohua. 1926. “Lingshi caipanquan wenti [The Issue of Extraterritoriality].” Duli Qingnian 1(2): 24–32.
-
Yishi Bao. 1925. “Woguo lvci cuicu geguo paiyuan diaocha sifa [China has Urged Treaty Powers to Send Commissioners to Inquire into China’s Judicial System for Many Times].” July 18.
-
Young, Mary. 2021. “Law and Modern State-building in Early Republican China: The Supreme Court of Peking (1911–1926).” Ph.D., Harvard University.
-
Yu, Donglin. 2014. “Shilun zaize kaocha zhengzhi riji Zhong de yihui [The Parliament in Zai Ze’s Diary Investigating Politics of Western Countries].” Jianghan Tribune 12: 116–19.
-
Yu, Zhong. 2014. “Minguo chunian de sifa duli--sifa zongzhang liang qichao de lilun yu shijian [Judicial Independence in the Early Years of Republic of China: The Minister of Justice Liang Qichao’s Thoughts and Practice]” Tsinghua University Law Journal 8(6): 17–34.
-
Yuan, Shikai. [1906] 2010. “Yuan Shikai zou zunzhi fuchen xinzuan xingshi minshi susong gefa zhe [Yuan Shikai’s Remarks on the Newly Drafted Criminal-Civil Procedural Laws].” In Qingmo fazhi biange shiliao (shangce) [Collection of Historical Archives on Legal-Judicial Reform of Late Qingi], edited by Xiaofeng Huai, 386–88. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.
-
Zhang, Renshan. 2003. “Jindai zhongde dengguo fayuan tizhi yu faguan zige daiyu ji shehui diwei zhi bijiao [A Comparative Study of Judicial Systems, Qualifications for being Judges, and Social Status of Judges in Modern China and Germany].” Jahrbuch des Deutsch-Chinesischen Instituts fuer Rechtswissenschaft der Universitaeten Goettingen und Nanjing (00): 51–68.
-
Zhang, Taisu and Tom Ginsburg. 2019. “China’s Turn toward Law.” Virginia Journal of International Law 59(2): 306–89.
-
Zhang, Yipeng. 1922. “Zhongguo sifa zhidu gaijin zhi yange [The Evolution of China’s Judicial System].” Faxue Jikan 1(1): 18–24.
-
Zhang, Zhidong. [1898] 1966. “Youxue dier [ii. To Learn Overseas].” In Quanxuepian [Encouraging Learning], by Zhidong Zhang, 89–92. Taipei: Wenhai Press.
-
Zhang, Zhidong. [1907] 2010. “Zhang Zhidong zou zunzhi heyi xinbian xingshi minshi susongfa zhe [Zhang Zhidong’s Remarks on Newly Drafted Criminal-Civil Procedural Law].” In Qingmo fazhi biange shiliao (shangce) [Collection of Historical Archives on Legal-Judicial Reform of Late Qingi], edited by Xiaofeng Huai, 400–12. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.
-
Zhang, Zhidong. [1907] 2014. “Zhidian junjichu deng liyan sifa duli buhe zhongguo qingxing [A Letter to the Grand Council Arguing that Judicial Independence is Incompatible with China’s Circumstance].” In Zhongguo jindai sixiangjia wenku: zhang zhidong juan [Thoughts of Modern China’s Thinkers: Zhang Zhidong’s Works], edited by Jianjie Wu, 323–24. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.
-
Zheng, Chaolin. 1926. “Diguo zhuyi youyi pianjv—faquan huiyi [Another Trap Made by Treaty Powers: The Inquiry into the Practice of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in China].” Xiangdao Zhoukan 143: 1305–7.
-
Zhou, Wei. 1929. “Wenmingguo you liji chefei lingshi caipanquan zhi yiwu [Civilized Nations are Liable to Immediately Give up Their Privilege of Extraterritoriality].” Zhongwai Pinglun (Nanjing) 12(separate): 5–12.
Made in China: Chinese Re-Conceptualization of the Ideal of Judicial Independence (1906–1937)
In: China Law and Society ReviewSearch for other papers by Guanhong Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Judicial independence has always been an important theme of China’s judicial reforms, both historically and in recent years. This article sheds light on how Chinese elites and intellectuals created a unique concept of judicial independence in the context of early twentieth-century China, seeking to trace the historical roots of the ongoing judicial reform in the People’s Republic. This uniqueness was characterized by three features: the heterogeneity within the Chinese conception of judicial independence, the reinterpretation of judicial independence into a tool for reinforcing China’s sovereignty, and the applauded control over courts and judges. These features resulted from the inherent tension within China’s pursuit of a modern state. By examining the early discourse and reform efforts, this paper not only highlights the historical struggles for judicial independence, but also, it contributes to understanding contemporary China’s distinctive path in judicial modernization, deviating from liberal constitutionalism.
