Data from an extensive research project in the state of Massachusetts (USA), collected in the 1960s and never before reported, are used to test a theory of association prevalence among 351 municipalities. The dependent variable to be explained was an Association Prevalence Index (total number existing) in each municipality. The Index was derived from Massachusetts Statehouse physical records for all incorporated Nonprofit Organizations (NPOs), and showed an average of 33 associations per municipality. Using bivariate correlations, the results confirmed the theory generally. Association prevalence (raw number of associations) in a municipality was positively and significantly related to larger population size, being a county administrative center, more business telephones, greater circulation of weekly newspapers (local newspapers), more service businesses, more state government agencies, more churches, larger percentage of African-Americans, and more halls/buildings available for association gatherings (meetings, events). Contrary to the theory, the socioeconomic status of municipalities was not significantly related to association prevalence. The Statehouse Association Prevalence Index was correlated very highly (r = .92) with an independent measure of association prevalence, derived from coding the “Yellow Pages” of phone books. This result indicates the reliability and general validity of both prevalence measures.
SmithDavid Horton“The Rest of the Nonprofit Sector: Grassroots Associations as the Dark Matter Ignored in Prevailing ‘Flat-Earth’ Maps of the Sector.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly1997b26114131
SmithDavid Horton“Urban/Suburban Hierarchical Dominance and Associational Prevalence in Eight Massachusetts Communities: Re-examining Data from the 1960s.”China Third Sector Research20111105110[Text in Chinese; References & Abstract in English.]
SmithDavid Horton“Review and Assessment of China’s Nonprofit Sector after Mao: Is It ‘Civil Society’ Now and Does that Matter?”2012Chestnut Hill, MADepartment of SociologyUnpublished paper submitted for editorial review
SmithDavid HortonBaldwinBurt“Voluntary Group Prevalence among the U.S. States: Factors Affecting the Distribution of Intercultural Understanding Groups (Sister City Programs).”International Journal of Comparative Sociology1990XXXI7985
SmithDavid HortonBaldwinBurtSmithDavid H.TilJon V.“Voluntary Organization Prevalence in the States of the USA: Presentation and a Test of the Revised Smith Model.”International Perspectives on Voluntary Action Research1983Washington, D.C.University Press of America5062
SmithDavid HortonShenCe“The Roots of Civil Society: A Model of Voluntary Association Prevalence Applied to Data on Larger Contemporary Nations.”International Journal of Comparative Sociology200242293133
TuckerDavid J.SinghJitendra V.MeinhardAgnes G.“Organizational Form, Population Dynamics, and Institutional Change: The Founding Patterns of Voluntary Organizations.”Academy of Management Journal199033151178
WaltzingJean P.Etudes Historiques sur les Corporations Professionelles chez les Romains Depuis les Origines Jusquà la Chute de l’Empire d’OccidentHistorical Studies of Professional Corporations of the Romans from the Origins to the Fall of the Empire in the West1895Louvain, BelgiumPaters4 Vols.
XuJunSmithDavid Horton“Pathways Legitimacy Theory: How Nonprofit Organizations in Post-Mao China Seek Recognition and Government Acceptance.”2012Beijing, ChinaCapital University of Economics and BusinessUnpublished paper submitted for editorial review