Policy Design and Social Construction amid Mass Protests

A Case Study of the Response to the Wukan Incident

in The China Nonprofit Review
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Studies on mass protests primarily examine the process, consequences and implications of protests from such angles as resource mobilization, political structure and opportunity, as well as policy frameworks, with little attention paid to the guiding role that related government policy have in dealing with mass protests. This paper analyzes the basic characters of government policies, further explains the basic logic behind their design, and takes the response to the Wukan incident as a typical case for confirmatory analysis. The study find that policy elements such as policy purpose, target groups, policy tools and executive bodies have remarkable underlying assumptions about effectiveness. If some assumptions fail to occur, policy failure is likely to appear. Therefore, in face of varying circumstances, it is recommended that policy design attach importance to elements about social construction, and adopt an open, interactive model which involves protesters in policy design.

Policy Design and Social Construction amid Mass Protests

A Case Study of the Response to the Wukan Incident

in The China Nonprofit Review

Sections

References

Dahl Politics Economics and Welfare 1953 New York Harper

ZhenglinGuo “The Degree, Motivation and Social Effects of Political Participation of Modern Chinese Farmers” Sociological Studies 2003 3 18 23

YanlingHeXiaoyunChen “From ‘I Don’t Fear’ to ‘I Fear’: How Do ‘General Population’ Form Protest Motivations in nimby Conflicts” Academic Research 2012 5 55 63

YingziHuYuxinLan “An Analysis of the Villager Organization in the Wukan Protests and Its Functions” China Non-profit Review 2012 2 80 92

RongguiHuang “Internet and Protest: Theoretical Model, Chinese Experience and Research Progress” Chinese Journal of Sociology 2010 2 178 197

JunJong S. BoyingSun “The Social Construction of Public Administration: Interpretive and Critical Perspectives” 2008 5 Beijing Peking University Press

QiongLi “A Survey of Studies on Social Conflict in a Transforming China” Academic Exploration 2003 10 52 55

NengLiu “Grievance Explanation, Mobilization Structure and Rational Choice: An Analysis of Possibilities of Collective Actions in Chinese Urban Areas” Open Times 2004 4 57 70

NengLiu “Several Theoretical Thoughts on Mass Actions in Contemporary China: Observations Based on Empirical Cases” Open Times 2008 3 110 123

NengLiu “Collective Action in the Transforming Society of Contemporary China: A Look Back at Three Waves of Collective Action over the Past 30 Years” Academia Bimestries 2009 4 146 152

ChengwuLouLiruiLiu “On Political Mobilization Online: An Asymmetric Situation” cass Journal of Political Science 2010 2 74 86

JingjingQianAnbinShi “Experimentation in China with Government Risk Communication from the Wukan Protests’ Perspective” Journalism Quarterly 2012 4 92 97

ZeqiQiu “Mass Incidents and the Social Basis for the Rule of Law” Journal of Yunnan University 2004 5 54 59 (Social Sciences)

A.SchneiderSidneyM. “What Is Next For Policy Design And Social Construction Theory?” The Policy Studie Journal 2009 37 1 103 119

LipingSun “Process-Event Analysis and the Practical Form of State-Farmer Relationship in Contemporary China” Tsinghua Sociological Review 2000 1 1

ZhihuiTong “Higher-level Government Intervention and Wukan’s Turn: A Preliminary Discussion of the Behavior of Higher-level Government in Protest Politics” China Non-profit Review 2012 2 93 112

GuoqinWang “The Genealogy of Concepts in ‘Collective Action’ Studies” Journal of Huazhong Normal University 2007a 5 31 35 (Humanities & Social Sciences)

GuoqinWang “A Review of ‘Collective Action’ Studies in Contemporary China” Academics in China 2007b 5 264 273

YangG. “Lightness, wildness, and ambivalence: China and new media studies” New Media & Society 2012 1 170 179

JianrongYu “An Alternative Interpretive Framework for Current Rights-defending Actions of Farmers” Sociological Studies 2004 2 49 55

JianrongYu “Incidents of Airing Social Grievances and Regulation Dilemma in China” Contemporary World & Socialism 2008 1 4 9

JianrongYu “Main Types and Basic Characters of Mass Incidents Currently in China” Journal of cupl 2009 6 114 120

XingYing “’Qi’ and the Reproduction of Collective Action in Rural China” Open Times 2007a 6 106 120

XingYing “Grass-roots Mobilization and the Mechanism for the Expression of Collective Interests of Farmers: A Comparative Study of Four Cases” Sociological Studies 2007b 2 1 23

XingYing “Mass Protest Actions in China” The Twenty-First Century Review 2012 12 17 25

YanbingZhangZhiminZeng “Small Wukan, Big China: On Implications That the Wukan Incident has for Political and Economic Development of China” China Non-profit Review 2012 2 135 148

FanxuZeng “The Virtual Organization of Movement Entrepreneurs: The Internet and New Models of Social Protests in Contemporary China” Open Times 2013 3 56 69

PengZengGuancuiLuo “How Could Collective Action Be Possible? – A Comprehensive Survey of Studies on Dynamic Mechanisms for Collective Action” Open Times 2006 1 110 123

Figures

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 103 103 2
Full Text Views 109 109 78
PDF Downloads 8 8 3
EPUB Downloads 3 3 0