Over recent years, grassroots organizations develop rapidly in China and have aroused attention of the academia. Given the lack of their legal legitimacy, how the grassroots organizations endeavor to survive and develop by leveraging relevant activity strategies is a subject worth in-depth research. This article, through a case study of a bird protection union in D City, finds that the grassroots organizations pursue substantive legitimacy via strategies targeting two aspects, namely, the entity that endows the legitimacy and the value judgment. Such strategies that arise from the interaction between the grassroots organizations and the government as well as society hold a non-negligible significance for social governance in China.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Bitektine A. “Toward a Theory of Social Judgments of Organizations: The Case of Legitimacy, Reputation, and Status” Academy of Management Review 2011 36 1 151 179
Chen F. “Between the State and Labor: The Conflict of Chinese Trade Unions’ Dual Institutional Identity” The China Quarterly 2003 176
Chen Yang “Research Overview upon Legitimacy in Organizational System Theory” East China Economic Management 2012 10 137 142 etc.
Chen Huaichao “Combing Through Organizational Legitimacy Research and Looking Beyond” Journal of Central University of Finance and Economics 2014 4 87 95 etc.
Fei Xianzheng “Theoretical Evaluation upon the Resource-dependent School’s Organization and Its Relationship with the Environment” Journal of Wuhan University 2005 (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 4 451 455
Gao Bingzhong “On Legitimacy of Social Groups” Social Sciences in China 2002 2 100 109
Gu Xin & Wang Xu “From Nationalism to Corporatism – Evolution of the Relationship Between the State and Professional Groups amid Chinese Market Transformation” Sociological Studies 2005 2 155 175
He Yanling “Action Strategies of Marginal Grassroots Organizations and Their Interpretation,” Journal of Public Management 2009 1 48 54
He Jingwei “Between Resource and Institution: Migrant Workers’ Grassroots ngo’s Survival Strategy” Society 2009 6 1 21 etc.
Huang Xiaochun Non-cooperative Governance and Strategic Response: A Theoretical Framework of Social Organizations’ Independent Studies 2014 6 98 122
Hudson A. “ngos’ Transnational Advocacy Networks: From ‘Legitimacy’ to ‘Political Responsibility’?” Global Networks 2001 1 4 331 352
Kang Xiaoguang ngo and Government Cooperation Strategy 2010 Beijing China Social Sciences Press 34 39 etc.
Latour B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory 2005 Oxford Oxford University Press
Liu Yang “A Distinction Between Legality and Legitimacy” Law and Social Development 2008 3 12 21 (bimonthly)
Liu An “Civil Society? Corporatism? – Research Commentary of Chinese State-Society Relationship after the Reform in Chinese Studies Abroad,” Journal of Literature, History & Philosophy 2009 5 162 168
Ma Yingxian “Inter-organizational Relationships: Evolution of Resource Reliance Theory” Society 2004 7 33 37
Peter Ho [Holland] & de Rui Zhi Ann [America] “Embedded Activism in China” 2012 Beijing Social Sciences Academic Press 88 88
Scott W. R. et al. Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care 2000 Chicago University of Chicago Press
Singh J. V. et al. “Organizational Legitimacy and the Liability of Newness” Administrative Science Quarterly 1986 31 2 171 193
Suchman M. C. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches” Academy of Management Review 1995 20 3 571 610
Su Yu “Deepening Legality Analysis Techniques: Towards Overall Legitimacy Oriental Law 2011 4 149 159
Tao Qing “Constitutional Dimension of Local governments and Civilian Organizations’ Legitimate Compromise – Nanfang City Fu Street Grassroots Chamber of Commerce’s Ethnography Perspective” International Politics Quarterly 2006 3
Wang Ming Social Organization and Social Governance 2014 Beijing Social Sciences Academic Press 17 17
Wu Jianping “Understanding Corporatism and Its Applicability in the Study of the Chinese State-Society Relationship” Sociological Studies 2012 1 174 198
Xiao Ying “From State and Society” to “System and Life”: Shifting Perspective of Research on Chinese Social Transformation” Social Sciences in China 2014 9 88 104
Xie Haiding “Legitimacy Plight of Chinese Civilian Organizations” Chinese Journal of Law 2004 2 17 34
Xin Tian “Social Networking and Charity Financing – A Case Study of the Shanghai Charity Foundation,” Journal of East China University of Science and Technology” 2002 (Social Sciences Edition) 4 2 66
Yu Keping Governance and Good Governance 2000 Beijing Social Sciences Academic Press 8 8
Zhang Jingen & Zhuang Wenjia “Informal Politics: A Grassroots ngo’s Action Strategy” Society 2008 2 133 150
Zhou Xueguang Ten Lectures on Organizational Sociology 2003 Beijing Social Sciences Academic Press 72 72
Zhou Yu “On Chinese Grassroots ngo’s Alienation Predicaments and Countermeasures” Inheritance 2007 5 84 84
Zhu Jiangang “Grassroots ngo and Growth of Chinese Civil Society” Open Times 2004 6 36 47
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 376 | 74 | 8 |
Full Text Views | 170 | 3 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 31 | 6 | 1 |
Over recent years, grassroots organizations develop rapidly in China and have aroused attention of the academia. Given the lack of their legal legitimacy, how the grassroots organizations endeavor to survive and develop by leveraging relevant activity strategies is a subject worth in-depth research. This article, through a case study of a bird protection union in D City, finds that the grassroots organizations pursue substantive legitimacy via strategies targeting two aspects, namely, the entity that endows the legitimacy and the value judgment. Such strategies that arise from the interaction between the grassroots organizations and the government as well as society hold a non-negligible significance for social governance in China.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 376 | 74 | 8 |
Full Text Views | 170 | 3 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 31 | 6 | 1 |