Analysis on the Effect of China’s Overseas ngo Law under the Differences in Legal Thinking

in The China Nonprofit Review
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The Law on the Management of Overseas NGOs’ Activities in Mainland China has come into effect on January 1, 2017. Ever since its second draft was unveiled to the public and then the final draft was adopted, Chinese and international civil society organizations have expressed their concerns and criticisms, far beyond the expectation of the Chinese government that intends to regulate illegal activities and protect legitimate rights with this law. This paper argues that the unexpected responses are provoked not only by the political purpose behind the adoption of this law – to safeguard national security – but also by the different interpretations of the law due to the differences in legal thinking. Beginning with an analysis of the law’s text, this paper continues to look at the regulatory framework and what has provoked the unexpected responses from the public, examines the differences in legal thinking – an underlying issue in this regard, and proposes that to ensure the effective enforcement of the law efforts should be made in three aspects, i.e. making clarification, establishing standard procedures, and protecting rights, to settle the idea differences between the legislature and the overseas civil society.

Analysis on the Effect of China’s Overseas ngo Law under the Differences in Legal Thinking

in The China Nonprofit Review

Sections

References

BelkinIraCohenJerome A. “Will China Close Its Doors?” New York Times 2015 June 2

Editorial “Undue burdens” Nature 2015 522 127 128

GaoBingzhong “Emergence of Social Groups and Their Legitimacy” Social Sciences in China 2000 2 104 108

HsuCarolyn L.TeetsJessica C. “Is China’s New Overseas NGO Management Law Sounding the Death Knell for Civil Society? Maybe Not” The Asia-Pacific Journal 2016 February 16 Vol. 14 Issue 4 2016 No. 3

RutzenDouglas “Aid Barriers and the Rise of Philanthropic Protectionism” International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law 2015 17 5 44

WongGillian “U.S. Business, Professional Groups Sign Letter Opposing Draft China ngo Law” Wall Street Journal 2015 June 4

ZiMing “Seven questions about the second draft of the Overseas NGO Law” Loongzone.com 2015 May 7

1

Li Qiang and Sabrina Shi“Foreign NGO Law A New Framework,” Insight (2016) June 7 http://diyitui.com/content-1466126315.45943313.html.

2

Clifford Coonan“China passes strict new law controlling foreign NGOs,” The Irish Times (2016) April 28 http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/asia-pacific/china-passes-strict-new-law-controlling-foreign-ngos-1.2628129.

5

Mark Sidel“It Just Got Harder to Make a Difference in China,” Foreign Policy (2016) April 29 http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/04/29/it-just-got-harder-to-make-a-difference-in-china-harsh-new-ngo-law-clamps-down-on-foreign-organizations/.

8

Editorial“Undue burdens,” Nature 522 (2015): 127-128.

9

Elizabeth M. Lynch“A Slow Death? China’s Draft Foreign NGO Management Law,” China Law & Policy (2015) May 10 http://chinalawandpolicy.com/2015/05/10/a-slow-death-chinas-draft-foreign-ngo-management-law/.

11

Ira Belkin and Jerome Cohenjune“Will China Close Its Doors?” New York Times (2015) June 2.

13

Gillian Wong“U.S. Business, Professional Groups Sign Letter Opposing Draft China NGO Law,” Wall Street Journal (2015) June 4.

23

Gao Bingzhong“Emergence of Social Groups and Their Legitimacy,” Social Sciences in China 2 (2000): 104-108.

27

Mark Sidel“Permissive or restrictive? A mixed picture for philanthropy in China,” Alliance Magazine 21 (2016) http://www.alliancemagazine.org/analysis/270708/.

29

Reza Hasmat“The Pros and Cons of China’s NGO Laws,” The Diplomat (2016) March 23 http://thediplomat.com/2016/03/the-pros-and-cons-of-chinas-ngo-laws/.

31

Douglas Rutzen“Aid Barriers and the Rise of Philanthropic Protectionism,” International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law 17 (2015): 5-44.

32

Carolyn L. Hsu & Jessica C. Teets“Is China’s New Overseas NGO Management Law Sounding the Death Knell for Civil Society? Maybe Not,” The Asia-Pacific Journal 14 (2016).

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 116 116 20
Full Text Views 95 95 76
PDF Downloads 5 5 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0