On Legitimacy of WISEs

A Case Study of CANYOU

in The China Nonprofit Review
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Amid the increasing diversification of social development, the services provided by the government hardly satisfy all sorts of needs. The establishment of non-profit organizations (npos) timely addresses the government’s deficiency in handling public affairs. As a result, the npos almost turn into private enterprises and social enterprises aim to deliver public benefits, which has aroused disputes and doubts like “mission drift” and “for-profits in disguise.” This article adopts Suchman’s pragmatic, moral and cognitive legitimacy analysis to reexamine the work integration social enterprises (WISEs) which enable the disadvantaged or those with disabilities to join in the labor market after training, coaching and professional practice. Based on literature review and in-depth interview, this article makes a case study of CANYOU, an exemplary social enterprise set by persons with disabilities by leveraging advanced technologies.

Sections

References

Alter, Sutia Kim, “Social Enterprise Models and their Mission and Money Relationships,” In Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change, ed. Alex Nicholls (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), 205-232.

Battilana, Julie, Metin Sengul, Anne-Claire Pache, and Jacob Model, “Harnessing Productive Tensions in Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Work Integration Social Enterprises,” Academy of Management Journal 58.6 (2015): 1658-1685.

Bornstein, David and Susan Davis, Social Entrepreneurship: What Everyone Needs to Know (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010).

CANYOU, CANYOU Business: Revolution of the Way of Living of People with Disabilities (Guangdong Province: Shenzhen CANYOU Group).

Chen Jiangang, “CANYOU Mode: The Revolution of the Way of Living for People with disabilities– Interview with Liu Haijun, General Manager of the Group,” Third Sector Review (2012): 133-140.

Chen Tingming and Peng Huiyu, “The Social Enterprise Operation Mode’s Benefit to and Impact on the Aboriginal Tribes: A Case Study of Aurora and Manna,” Journal of State and Society 18 (2016): 61-109.

Chen Tingming, “International Social Enterprises and Grassroots Civil Society Development in Chinese Mainland,” Third Sector Review 13 (2010): 35-68.

Chen Tingming, Hakka Social Enterprises and Social Network Analysis (Taipei: Bestwise Press, 2012).

Chen Tingming, “Research on Social Impact Indexes of Taiwan Social Enterprises,” The result report on the 2016 special research plan subsidized (The Ministry of Science and Technology, 2016) (Plan No.: most 104-2410-H-008-026).

Connolly, Ciaran and Martin Kelly, “Understanding Accountability in Social Enterprise Organisations: a Framework,” Social Enterprise Journal 7.3 (2011): 224-237.

Cooney, Kate, “An Exploratory Study of Social Purpose Business Models in the United States,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40.1 (2011): 185-196.

Dart, Raymond, “The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise,” Nonprofit Management & Leadership 14.4 (2004): 411-424.

Dees, J. Gregory, The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship (Working paper. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 1998).

Defourny, Jacques and Marthe Nyssens, “Defining Social Enterprise,” In Social Enterprise: at the Crossroads of Market, Public Policies and Civil Society, eds. Marthe Nyssens, Sophie Adam, and Toby Johnson (London: Routledge Press, 2006), 3-26.

Di Maggio, Paul and Walter W. Powell, Jr., “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review 48 (1983): 147-160.

Eikenberry, Angela M. and Jodie D. Kluver, “The Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector: Civil Society at Risk,” Public Administration Review 64.2 (March/April2004): 132-140.

Guan Youyuan, “The Development of Social Enterprises in Taiwan: Concepts, Traits and Types,” in Social Enterprises: Comparison of Taiwan and Hong Kong, eds. Guan Youyuan, Chen Jintang, Lu Wanping and Wang Shitu (Taipei: Chuliu Press, 2012), 61-94.

Han Yici, “From the Perspective of Empowering the Weak and Organizational Autonomy: The Impact of WISEs on the Disadvantaged,” Community Development Quarterly 152 (2015): 198-214.

Jin Renmin, “Social Entrepreneurship Ecology under Dual Objectives: A Case Study of Shenzhen CANYOU Group,” Journal of Jilin Business and Technology College 32.3 (2016): 42-46.

Kuosmanen, Jari, “Care Provision, Empowerment, and Market Forces: the Art of Establishing Legitimacy for Work Integration Social Enterprises (WISEs),” Voluntas 25 (2014): 248-269.

Kuttner, Robert, Everything for Sale: The Virtues and Limits of Markets (New York: Random House Press, 1997).

Liu Yuxin & Zheng Shengfen, “Commercialization of NPOs and Social Enterprises: Transformation of Employment Patterns for Persons with Disabilities,” Disability Study 12.1 (2014): 54-66.

Lounsbury, Michael, “A Tale of Two Cities: Competing Logics and Practice Variation in the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds,” Academy of Management Journal 50 (2007): 289-330.

Nicholls, Alex, “The Legitimacy of Social Entrepreneurship: Reflexive Isomorphism in a Pre-Paradigmatic Field,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 34.3 (2010): 611-633.

Peng Jingsong and Li Youhuan, “Social Enterprise Business Mode Research: A Case Study of Guangdong CANYOU Group,” Jiangxi Social Sciences 4 (2012): 224-227.

Pfeffer, Jeffrey and Gerald Salancik, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (New York: HarperCollins Press, 1978).

Raymond, Susan U., The Future of Philanthropy: Economics, Ethics, and Management (San Francisco, CA.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004).

Salamon, Lester M., Partners in Public Service: Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995).

Scott, William R., Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1992).

Social Enterprise uk, State of Social Enterprise Survey 2013: The People’s Business (UK: Royal Bank of Scotland Group, 2013).

Stryker, Robin, “Legitimacy Processes as Institutional Politics: Implications for Theory and Research in the Sociology of Organizations,” Research in the Sociology of Organizations 17 (2000): 179-223.

Suchman, Mark C., “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches,” Academy of Management Review 20.3 (1995): 571-610.

Wang Shitu, et al., “The Role and Function of WISEs: A Comparative Analysis of Taiwan and Hong Kong,” Humanities and Social Sciences Research 4.2 (2010): 106-130.

Weber, Max, The Theory of Social and Economic Organizations (New York: Free Press, 1947).

Weisbrod, Burton A., The Nonprofit Economy (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1988).

Wu Mingzhu and Zheng Shengfen, “On Transformation of Sheltered Workshops into Society Enterprises,” Disability Study 10.2 (2012): 148-162.

Xu Jialiang, et al, “Social Enterprises and Public Goods Supply from the Perspective of Multi-center Theory: A Case Study of CANYOU,” Journal of Tianjin Administration Institute 16.6 (2014): 3-10.

Zhang Cuiyu, “On Business Management of WISEs in Taiwan,” Community Development Quarterly 132 (2010): 418-431.

Zucker, Lynne G., “Institutional Theories of Organization,” Annual Review of Sociology 13 (1987): 443-464.

Figures

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 192 192 7
Full Text Views 8 8 6
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 3 3 2