It is simply a fact that it is not in the same intention that Dewey relates to Hegel in a programmatic article such as “The Present position of Logical Theory,” in his Lectures on Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit, in his Lectures on the Logic of Hegel, and in the articles collected in The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy. Dewey’s references to Hegel differ in status and functions, and these differences have to be made explicit if one wants to elaborate a consistent account of Dewey’s relation to Hegel. The article proceeds in four steps. It distinguishes between what relates to Dewey’s reading of Hegel (1), to Dewey’s use of Hegel (2), and to Dewey’s reconstruction of Hegel (3). In a last and concluding step, it deals with the methodological originality of Dewey’s project of actualizing Hegel (4).
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Dalton Thomas C.2002. Becoming John Dewey: Dilemmas of a Philosopher and Naturalist. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Dewey Jane, . 1939. “ Biography of John Dewey,” in The Philosophy of John Dewey, ed. Schilpp Paul Arthur (New York: Tudor Publishing Co), pp. 3–45.
Dewey John. 1969–1991. The Collected Works of John Dewey , 1882–1953, ed. Jo Ann Boydston, Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press. [published in three series as The Early Works (quoted “ew”), The Middle Works (quoted “mw”) and The Later Works (quoted “lw”)].
Dewey John. 1999–2009. The Correspondence of John Dewey, 1871–1952 (i–iv). Charlottesville: InteLex Corporation (Quoted C, a number of volume and the number of the letter).
Dewey John. 2010a. “ Hegel’s philosophy of Spirit,” in John R. Shook, James A. Good, John Dewey’s Philosophy of Spirit, with the 1897 Lecture on Hegel (New York: Fordham University Press), pp. 93–192 (quoted Dewey 1897).
Dewey John. 2010b. The Class Lectures of John Dewey. Volume I: Political Philosophy, Logic, Ethics. Charlottesville: InteLex Corporation.
Dewey John. Forth., “ Commentary on The Logic of Hegel (1904),” in The Class Lectures of John Dewey. Volume ii (Charlottesville: InteLex) (quoted Dewey 1904).
Garrison Jim. 1995. “ Dewey’s Philosophy and the Experience of Working: Labor, Tools and Language,” Synthese 105(1): 87–114.
Garrison Jim. 2006. “ The ‘Permanent Deposit’ of Hegelian Thought in Dewey’s Theory of Inquiry,” Educational Theory 56(1): 1–37.
Good James A.2006a. A Search for Unity in Diversity: The ‘Permanent Hegelian Deposit’ in the Philosophy of John Dewey. Lanham: Lexington.
Good James A.2006b. “ Dewey’s ‘Permanent Hegelian Deposit’ and the Exigencies of War,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44(2): 293–314.
Good James A., and Garrison Jim, . 2010a. “ Traces of Hegelian Bildung in Dewey’s Philosophy,” in John Dewey and Continental Philosophy, ed. Fairfield Paul (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press), pp. 44–68.
Good James A., and Garrison J.2010b. “ Dewey, Hegel, and Causation,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24: 101–120.
Johnston James S.2014. John Dewey’s Earlier Logical Theory. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
Midtgarden Torjus. 2011. “The Hegelian Legacy in Dewey’s Social and Political Philosophy, 1915–1920,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 47(4): 361–388.
Pearce Trevor. 2014. “ The Dialectical Biologist, circa 1890: John Dewey and the Oxford Hegelians,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52(4): 747–777.
Randal J. H.1977. Philosophy after Darwin. New York: Columbia University Press.
Renault Emmanuel. 2012. “ The Naturalistic Side of Hegel’s Naturalist Pragmatism,” Critical Horizons 13(2): 244–273.
Renault Emmanuel. 2013. “Dewey, Mead e il concetto hegeliani di riconoscimento,” Consecutio Temporum 6. At http://www.consecutio.org/2013/04/dewey-mead-e-il-concetto-hegeliano-di-riconoscimento-2/, accessed 5 April 2016.
Renault Emmanuel, . 2014. “ Dewey et Mead hégéliens,” in Mead et la théorie de la socialisation, ed. Cukier Alexis, and Debray Eva (Lormont: Éditions du bord de l’eau), pp. 86–104.
Renault Emmanuel. 2015. Connaître ce qui est. Enquête sur le présentisme hégélien. Paris: Vrin.
Renault Emmanuel, . Forth. “ Hegel lecteur de la Science de la logique,” in La Science de la logique au miroir de l’identité, ed. Mabille Bernard, and Gérard Gilbert (Louvain/Paris: Peeters).
Rosenstock Gershon G.1964. F. A. Trendelenburg: Forerunner to John Dewey. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Scott John. 2006. “ Dewey’s Critique of Kant,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 42(4): 518–551.
Särkelä Arvi. 2013. “ Ein Drama in drei Akten: Der Kampf um öffentliche Anerkennung nach Dewey und Hegel”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 61(5–6): 681–696.
Shook John R.2000. Dewey’s Empirical Theory of Knowledge and Reality. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
Shook John R., and Good James A.2010. John Dewey’s Philosophy of Spirit, with the 1897 Lecture on Hegel. New York: Fordham University Press.
In a letter dated 9 July 1945, he wrote: “I jumped through Hegel, I should say, not just out of him. I took some of the hoop (continuity, anti-hard-and-fast separation) with me, and also carried away considerable of the paper the hoop was as filled with” (C iii: 15481).
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 930 | 118 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 253 | 6 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 68 | 16 | 0 |
It is simply a fact that it is not in the same intention that Dewey relates to Hegel in a programmatic article such as “The Present position of Logical Theory,” in his Lectures on Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit, in his Lectures on the Logic of Hegel, and in the articles collected in The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy. Dewey’s references to Hegel differ in status and functions, and these differences have to be made explicit if one wants to elaborate a consistent account of Dewey’s relation to Hegel. The article proceeds in four steps. It distinguishes between what relates to Dewey’s reading of Hegel (1), to Dewey’s use of Hegel (2), and to Dewey’s reconstruction of Hegel (3). In a last and concluding step, it deals with the methodological originality of Dewey’s project of actualizing Hegel (4).
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 930 | 118 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 253 | 6 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 68 | 16 | 0 |