A Hegelian Critique of Richard Rorty’s Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity

Contemporary Pragmatism

I read Rorty’s Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity as an attempt to reconcile two, seemingly conflicting, sources of authority and obligation. Some believe that persons are obligated by reason or God to promote just institutions. While others locate authority and obligation solely in the self. Rorty tells us that we need not choose between these sources of normativity, but can see each as applicable to two, non-conflicting parts of our lives. I contend that Rorty’s solution rests on a misunderstanding of the upshots of contingency and of the conditions of personhood. I argue that Hegel provides a more compelling resolution of the tension between public obligation and private autonomy.

  • Hegel G.W.F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. New York, ny: Oxford University Press.

  • Korsgaard Christine . 1996. Sources of Normativity. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.

  • Rorty Richard . 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York, ny: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sellars Wilfrid . 1997. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.

  • Wittgenstein Ludwig . Philosophical Investigations. 1974. Oxford, uk: Blackwell Publishing.

内容统计数据

全部期间 过去一年 过去30天
摘要浏览次数 185 162 12
全文浏览次数 223 212 1
PDF下载次数 16 13 1