Save

Paintbrushes and Crowbars: Richard Rorty and the New Public-Private Divide

In: Contemporary Pragmatism
Author:
John P. Anderson Professor of Law, Mississippi College School of Law, 151 E. Griffith Street, Jackson, ms39201 jpanders@mc.edu

Search for other papers by John P. Anderson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

In an often-quoted passage, Richard Rorty wrote that “J.S. Mill’s suggestion that governments devote themselves to optimizing the balance between leaving people’s lives alone and preventing suffering seems to me pretty much the last word.” In this article, I show why, for Rorty, maintaining a strong public-private divide that cordons off final vocabularies – the religious, racial, ethnic, sexual, gender, philosophical, and other terms so important for citizens’ private pursuits of self-creation and self-perfection – from public political discourse is a crucial means to accomplishing both of these goals in post-secular liberal democracies. Public political justifications should instead be articulated in the foundation-neutral terms of a shared national vocabulary. Like paintbrushes and crowbars, final and shared vocabularies are different tools for different purposes, and a strong public-private divide helps ensure that no harm comes from their misuse.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 268 27 2
Full Text Views 204 2 0
PDF Views & Downloads 34 8 0