Paintbrushes and Crowbars: Richard Rorty and the New Public-Private Divide

In: Contemporary Pragmatism
View More View Less
  • 1 Professor of Law, Mississippi College School of Law, 151 E. Griffith Street, Jackson, ms 39201 jpanders@mc.edu

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

In an often-quoted passage, Richard Rorty wrote that “J.S. Mill’s suggestion that governments devote themselves to optimizing the balance between leaving people’s lives alone and preventing suffering seems to me pretty much the last word.” In this article, I show why, for Rorty, maintaining a strong public-private divide that cordons off final vocabularies – the religious, racial, ethnic, sexual, gender, philosophical, and other terms so important for citizens’ private pursuits of self-creation and self-perfection – from public political discourse is a crucial means to accomplishing both of these goals in post-secular liberal democracies. Public political justifications should instead be articulated in the foundation-neutral terms of a shared national vocabulary. Like paintbrushes and crowbars, final and shared vocabularies are different tools for different purposes, and a strong public-private divide helps ensure that no harm comes from their misuse.

  • Anderson John P. 2017. “Law Beyond God and Kant: A Pragmatist Path,” Journal of Law and Religion 32: pp. 98122.

  • Anderson John P. 2003. “Patriotic Liberalism,” Law and Philosophy 22: pp. 577595.

  • Anderson John P. 2014, “Trading Truth for Legitimacy in the Liberal State: Defending John Rawls’s Pragmatism,” Studies in Law, Politics and Society 65: pp. 129.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • An-Na’Im Abdullahi Ahmen . 2008. Islam and the Secular State. Cambridge, usa: Harvard University Press.

  • Brandom Robert . 1994. Making It Explicit. Cambridge, usa: Harvard University Press.

  • Carter Stephen . 1994. The Culture of Disbelief. New York, usa: Anchor Books.

  • Carter Stephen . 1989. “The Religiously Devout Judge,” Notre Dame Law Review 64: pp. 932944.

  • Dreyfus Hubert , and Kelly Sean Dorrance . 2011. All Things Shinning. New York, usa: Free Press Publishing.

  • Gaus Gerald . 2012. The Order of Public Reason. Cambridge, uk: Cambridge University Press.

  • Greenawalt Kent . 1988. Religious Convictions and Political Choice. New York, usa: Oxford University Press.

  • Hart H.L.A. 1994. The Concept of Law . Oxford, uk: Oxford University Press.

  • Horkheimer Max , and Adorno Theodor W. . 1972. Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. Cumming John (New York, usa: Herder and Herder).

  • Idleman Scott . 2005. “The Concealment of Religious Values in Judicial Decision Making,” Virginia Law Review 91: pp. 515534.

  • Jackson Timothy . 1997. “The Return of the Prodigal? Liberal Theory and Religious Pluralism”, in Religion and Contemporary Liberalism, ed. Weithman Paul J. (South Bend, University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 182217.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jefferson Thomas . 1776. The Declaration of Independence.

  • Kant Immanuel . 1785. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals (Indianapolis, usa: Hackett Publishing, 1993).

  • Kateb George . 1989. “Democratic Individuality and the Meaning of Rights,” in Liberalism and the Moral Life, ed. Rosenblum Nancy L (Cambridge, usa: Harvard University Press), 183191.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Levinson Sanford . 1997. “Abstinence and Exclusion: What Does Liberalism Demand of the Religiously Oriented (Would Be) Judge?,” in Religion and Contemporary Liberalism, ed. Weithman Paul J. (South Bend, University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 7692.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lock John . 1690. Second Treatise of Government (Indianapolis, usa: Hackett Publishing, 1980).

  • Modak-Truran Mark . 2004. “Reenchanting the law: The Religious Dimension of Judicial Decision Making,” Catholic University Law Review 53 pp. 709816.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Perry Michael . 1993. “Religious Morality and Political Choice: Further Thoughts – and Second Thoughts – on Love and Power,” San Diego Law Review 30: pp. 703727.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pogge Thomas . 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca, usa: Cornell University Press.

  • Quinn Philip . 1997. “Political Liberalisms and Their Exclusions of the Religious,” in Religion and Contemporary Liberalism, ed. Weithman Paul J. (South Bend, University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 138161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rawls John . 1993. Political Liberalism. New York, usa: Columbia University Press.

  • Rawls John . 2005. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,” in Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition (New York, usa: Columbia University Press), pp. 440490.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rorty Richard . 1997. Achieving Our Country. Cambridge, usa: Harvard University Press.

  • Rorty Richard . 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity . Cambridge, uk: Cambridge University Press.

  • Rorty Richard . 1988. “The Priority of Democracy to Philosophy,” repr. in Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers Volume One (Cambridge, uk: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 175196.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rorty Richard . 1994. “The Unpatriotic Academy,” repr. in Philosophy and Social Hope (London, uk: Penguin Books, 1999), pp. 252254.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Senior Jennifer . 2016. “Richard Rorty’s 1998 Book Suggested Election 2016 Was Coming,” New York Times (Nov. 20, 2016).

  • Wolterstorff Nicholas . 1997. “Why We Should Reject What Liberalism Tells Us about Speaking and Acting for Religious Reasons,” in Religion and Contemporary Liberalism, ed. Weithman Paul J. (South Bend, University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 162181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 171 68 1
Full Text Views 200 3 0
PDF Views & Downloads 18 5 1