Philosophers have traditionally described themselves as “intuitive scientists”: people seeking the most justified theories about distinctive aspects of the world. Relying on insights from philosophers as Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Williams James, I argue that philosophers should be described instead as “intuitive lawyers” who defend a point of view largely by appealing to non-cognitive reasons.
PlantingaAlvin. 1983. “Reason and Belief in God.” In Faith and Rationality. Reason and Belief in God, eds. PlantingaAlvin and WolterstorffNicholas, 16–93. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
PopperKarl. 1996b. “Toleration and Intellectual Responsibility (Stolen from Xenophanes and from Voltaire.” In Search of a Better World: Lectures and Essays from Thirty Years, 188–203. London and New York: Routledge.
Van InwagenPeter. 1996. “It Is Wrong, Everywhere, Always, for Anyone, to Believe Anything upon Insufficient Evidence.” In Faith, Freedom and Rationality, eds. JordanJeff and Howard-SnyderDaniel, 137–154. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.