In Praise of Outsourcing

in Contemporary Pragmatism
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

What explains the context sensitivity of some (apparent) beliefs? Why, for example, do religious beliefs appear to control behaviour in some contexts but not others? Cases like this are heterogeneous, and we may require a matching heterogeneity of explanations, ranging over their contents, the attitudes of agents and features of the environment. In this paper, I put forward a hypothesis of the last kind. I argue that some beliefs (religious and non-religious) are coupled to cues, which either trigger an internal representation or even partially constitute the beliefs. I show that such coupling will give rise to the context-sensitivity, without entailing that religious believers take a different attitude to belief content.

In Praise of Outsourcing

in Contemporary Pragmatism

Sections

References

  • Astuti Rita and Harris Paul L. P.L. 2008. Understanding morality and the life of the ancestors in rural Madagascar. Cognitive Science 32: 713740.

  • Barrett Justin L. 2000. Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 2934.

  • Barrett Justin L. 2001. How Ordinary Cognition Informs Petitionary Prayer. Journal of Cognition and Culture 1: 259269.

  • Barrett Justin L. 2004. Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.

  • Baumard Nicolas and Boyer Pascal . 2013. Religious beliefs as reflective elaborations on intuitions: A modified dual-process model. Current Directions in Psychological Science 22: 295300.

  • Baumeister Roy F. Bauer Isabelle M. and Lloyd Stuart A. . 2010. Choice, free will, and religion. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 2: 6782

  • Bloom Paul . 2004 Descartes’ Baby. New York: Basic Books.

  • Boyer Pascal . 2001. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.

  • Boyer Pascal . 2013. Why “belief” is hard work: Implications of Tanya Luhrmann’s When God talks back . Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3: 34957.

  • Breen Nora Caine Diane Coltheart Max Hendy Julie and Roberts Corrine . 2000. Towards an Understanding of Delusions of Misidentification: Four Case Studies. Mind and Language 15: 74110.

  • Bridgeman Bruce Kirch Marc and Alan Sperling A. 1981. Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception and Psychophysics 29: 33642.

  • Stefano Cappa Sterzi Roberto Vallar Giuseppe and Bisiach Edoardo . 1987. Remission of Hemineglect And Anosognosia During Vestibular Stimulation. Neuropsychologia 25: 77582.

  • Clark Andy . 1997. Being There: Putting Brain Body and World Together Again. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

  • Clark Andy . 2008. Supersizing the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Currie Greg . 2000. Imagination, hallucination and delusion. Mind and Language 15: 168183.

  • Currie Greg and Ian Ravenscroft I. 2002. Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Driver Jon . Davis Greg Ricciardelli Paola Kidd Polly Maxwell Emma and Baron-Cohen Simon . 1999. Gaze Perception Triggers Reflexive Visuospatial Orienting. Visual Cognition 6: 509540.

  • Duhaime Erik P. 2015. Is the call to prayer a call to cooperate? A field experiment on the impact of religious salience on prosocial behavior. Judgment and Decision Making 10: 593596.

  • Edelman Benjamin . 2009. Red Light States: Who Buys Online Adult Entertainment?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 23: 209220.

  • Galen Luke W. 2012. Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin 138: 876906.

  • Goodale Melvyn Pélisson Denis and Prablanc Claude .1986. Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 320: 74850.

  • Gray Russell. D. and Jospeh Watts. 2017. Cultural macroevolution matters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114: 78467852.

  • Harris Paul . 2012. Trusting What You’re Told: How Children Learn from Others. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

  • Harris Paul and Giménez Marta . 2005. Children’s acceptance of conflicting testimony: The case of death. Journal of Cognition and Culture 5: 143164.

  • Henrich Joseph . 2009. The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion. Evolution and Human Behavior 30: 244260.

  • Hirstein William and Ramachandran Vilayanur . 1997. Capgras syndrome: A novel probe for understanding the neural representation of the identity and familiarity of persons. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London . Series B: Biological Sciences 264: 437444.

  • Leeson Peter T. 2012. Ordeals. Journal of Law and Economics 55: 691714.

  • Malhotra Deepak K. 2008. (When) are Religious People Nicer? Religious Salience and the ‘Sunday Effect’ on Pro-Social Behavior. Harvard Business School NOM Working Paper No. 09–066. < http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1297275 >

  • Norenzayan Ara . 2013. Big Gods: How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Northover Stefanie B. Pedersen William C. Cohen Adam B. and Andrews Paul W. . 2017. Artificial surveillance cues do not increase generosity: Two meta-analyses. Evolution and Human Behavior 38: 144153.

  • Rayner Keith . 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124: 372422.

  • Rigdon Mary Ishii Keiko Watabe Motoki and Kitayama Shinobu 2009. Minimal social cues in the dictator game. Journal of Economic Psychology 30: 358367.

  • Schwitzgebel Eric . 2001. In-between believing. Philosophical Quarterly51(202) 7682.

  • Schwitzgebel Eric . 2010. Acting contrary to our professed beliefs or the gulf between occurrent judgment and dispositional belief. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly91(4) 531553.

  • Shariff Azim F. Willard Aiyana K. Andersen Teresa and Norenzayan Ara 2016. Religious Priming: A Meta-analysis with a Focus on Prosociality Personality and Social Psychology Review 20: 27–48.

  • Simons Daniel J. and Levin Daniel T. . 1997. Change Blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1: 261267.

  • Simons Daniel J. and Levin Daniel T. . 1998. Failure to Detect Changes to People During a Real-World Interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5: 644649.

  • Sosis Richard . 2006. Religious behaviors, badges, and bans: Signaling theory and the evolution of religion. In Where God and Science Meet: How Brain and Evolutionary Studies Alter Our Understanding of Religion Volume 1: Evolution Genes and the Religious Brain ed. McNamara P. (Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers) pp. 6186.

  • Sparks Adam M. and Barclay Pat . 2015. No effect on condemnation of short or long exposure to eye images. Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science 6: 1316.

  • Leeuwen Van Neil . 2014. Religious Belief in not Factual Belief. Cognition 133: 698715.

  • Leeuwen Van Neil . 2017. Two Paradigms for Religious Representation: The Physicist and the Playground. Cognition 164: 206211.

  • Xygalatas Dimitris . 2013. Effects of religious setting on cooperative behaviour. A case study from Mauritius. Religion Brain and Behavior 3: 91102.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 32 32 13
Full Text Views 57 57 4
PDF Downloads 12 12 2
EPUB Downloads 9 9 6