In this article I discuss the advantages of a theory of political representation for a pragmatist theory of (global) democracy. I first outline Dewey’s disregard for political representation by analyzing the political, epistemological and aesthetic underpinnings of his criticism of the Enlightenment ideal of democracy and its trust in the power of the detached gaze. I then show that a theory of political representation is not only compatible with a pragmatist Deweyan-pragmatist perspective on democratic politics but also that Dewey’s concept of “publics”, if applied to contemporary circumstances of globalized politics, requires such a theory. I suggest a pragmatic theory of political representation that combines elements of Dewey’s aesthetics, particularly his own theory of vision, with Michael Saward’s conception of representative claim-making into the notion of aesthetic democratic representation.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Bohman James . 2010. “Participation through Publics: Did Dewey Answer Lippmann?” Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (1): 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-90000155.
Celis Karen , Childs Sarah , Kantola Johanna , and Krook Mona Lena . 2008. “Rethinking Women’s Substantive Representation.” Representation 44 (2): 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890802079573.
Dewey John . 1954. The Public & Its Problems. 1st ed. Ohio: Swallow Press.
Dewey John . 2005. Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Trade.
Dewey John . 2008a. The Later Works, 1925–1953, Volume 4: 1929—The Quest for Certainty. Edited by Boydston Jo Ann . Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press
Dewey John . 2008b. The Middle Works, 1899–1924, Volume 2: 1902–1903. Edited by Boydston Jo Ann . Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey John . 2008c. The Early Works of John Dewey, Volume 1, 1882–1898: Early Essays and Leibniz’s New Essays, 1882–1888. Edited by Boydston Jo Ann and Axetell George E. . 1st edition. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Disch Lisa . 2015. “The ‘Constructivist Turn’ in Democratic Representation: A Normative Dead-End?” Constellations 22 (4): 487–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12201.
Dovi Suzanne . 2017. “Political Representation.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta Edward N. , Winter 2017. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/political-representation/.
Ezrahi Yaron . 1997. “Dewey’s Critique of Democratic Visual Culture and Its Political Implications.” In Sites of Vision—The Discursive Construction of Sight in the History of Philosophy, edited by Levin David Michael , 315–36. Cambridge Mass. MIT Press.
Frega Roberto . 2017. “Pragmatism and Democracy in a Global World.” Review of International Studies 43 (4): 720–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000080.
Lacey Joseph . 2017. Centripetal Democracy: Democratic Legitimacy and Political Identity in Belgium, Switzerland, and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lippmann Walter . 2017. The Phantom Public. New York: Routledge.
Lord Christopher , and Pollak Johannes . 2013. “The Pitfalls of Representation as Claims-Making in the European Union.” Journal of European Integration 35 (5): 517–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2013.799941.
Maine Henry Sumner . 1976. Popular Government. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Midtgarden Torjus . 2015. “John Dewey and Democratic Participation under Modern Conditions.” In Action, Belief and Inquiry: Pragmatist Perspectives on Science, Society and Religion, 29–43. Nordic Studies in Pragmatism 3. Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network.
Näsström Sofia . 2011. “Where Is the Representative Turn Going?” European Journal of Political Theory 10 (4): 501–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885111417783.
Pitkin Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Saward Michael . 2006. “The Representative Claim.” Contemporary Political Theory 5 (3): 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300234.
Saward Michael . 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford ; New York: Oxford Univ Press.
Severs Eline , Celis Karen , and Meier Petra . 2013. “Representative Claims and beyond: A Study of Muslim Women’s Inclusion in the Flemish Headscarf Debate.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 1 (3): 433–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2013.816633.
Testa Italo . 2017. “Dewey’s Social Ontology: A Pragmatist Alternative to Searle’s Approach to Social Reality.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (1): 40–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2016.1260625.
Warren Mark , and Castiglione Dario . 2004. “The Transformation of Democratic Representation.” Democracy and Society 2 (1): 5–22.
Westbrook Robert B. 1993. John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Young Iris Marion . 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 704 | 88 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 100 | 4 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 77 | 6 | 0 |
In this article I discuss the advantages of a theory of political representation for a pragmatist theory of (global) democracy. I first outline Dewey’s disregard for political representation by analyzing the political, epistemological and aesthetic underpinnings of his criticism of the Enlightenment ideal of democracy and its trust in the power of the detached gaze. I then show that a theory of political representation is not only compatible with a pragmatist Deweyan-pragmatist perspective on democratic politics but also that Dewey’s concept of “publics”, if applied to contemporary circumstances of globalized politics, requires such a theory. I suggest a pragmatic theory of political representation that combines elements of Dewey’s aesthetics, particularly his own theory of vision, with Michael Saward’s conception of representative claim-making into the notion of aesthetic democratic representation.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 704 | 88 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 100 | 4 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 77 | 6 | 0 |