Humanism is charged with fostering a harmful anthropocentrism that has led to the exploitation of non-human beings and the environment. Posthumanist and transhumanist ideas prominently aim at rethinking our self-understanding and human-nature relations. Yet these approaches turn out to be flawed when it comes to addressing the challenges of the “age of the humanity”, the Anthropocene. Whereas posthumanism fails in acknowledging the exceptional role of human beings with regard to political agency and responsibility, transhumanism overemphasizes human capabilities of controlling nature and only deepens the human-nature dualism. Therefore, a critical and humble version of humanism is suggested as a viable alternative. Drawing on pragmatist thinkers William James and F.C.S. Schiller, a resource for de-centering the human being is provided that critically reflects our role in the larger ecosystem and underlines human potentials as well as human responsibilities.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abel Reuben . 1955. The Pragmatic Humanism of F.C.S. Schiller. New York: King’s Crown Press.
Braidotti Rosi . 2014. Posthumanismus. Leben jenseits des Menschen. Frankfurt a. M. – New York: Campus.
Clark Andy . 2003. Natural-born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cudworth, Erika / Hobden, Stephen (2015a). “Liberation for Straw Dogs? Old Materialism, New Materialism, and the Challenge of an Emancipatory Posthumanism”. Globalizations Vol. 12, No.1 (2015), pp. 134–148.
Cudworth, Erika / Hobden, Stephen (2015b). “Overcoming the Denial of Nature: A Posthuman Perspective”. At http://www.lse.ac.uk/internationalRelations/Journals/millenn/pdf/conferencePapers/Cudworth-Hobden--Denial-of-Nature---2015-Millennium-Conference.docx, accessed 22.03.18.
Cudworth, Erika/Hobden, Stephen. 2011 . Posthuman International Relations. Complexity, Ecologism and Global Politics. London: Zed Books.
Cudworth Erika : “Feminism”, in Critical Environmental Politics, ed. Carl Death . (London – New York: Routledge), pp. 91–99.
Dewey John . 1929. The Quest for Certainty. A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Fuller Robert . 1992. “American Pragmatism Reconsidered: William James’ Ecological Ethics”, in: Environmental Ethics: An Interdisciplinary Journal Dedicated to the Philosophical Aspects of Environmental Problems 14, pp. 159–176.
Gavin William J . 2010. “Pragmatism and Death: Method vs. Metaphor, Tragedy vs. The Will to Believe”, in 100 Years of Pragmatism. William James’ Revolutionary Philosophy ed. John J. Stuhr (Bloomington et al.: Indiana University Press), pp. 81–95.
Gray John . 2007. Straw Dogs. Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Harari Yuval Noah . 2017. Homo Deus. A Brief History of Tomorrow, London: Vintage.
Hickman Larry A. 1996. “Nature as Culture. John Dewey’s Pragmatic Naturalism”, in Environmental Pragmatism ed. Andrew Light and Eric Katz (New York: Routledge), pp. 50–72.
Hobden Stephen . 2014. “Posthumanism”, in Critical Environmental Politics ed. Carl Death (London – New York: Routledge), pp. 175–183.
Honnacker Ana . 2018. Pragmatic Humanism Revisited. An Essay on Making the World a Home. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
James William . 1975. Pragmatism, A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. The Works of William James Vol. 1. Cambridge – London: Harvard University Press.
James William . 1983. Talks to Teachers on Psychology and to Students on Some of Life’s Ideals. The Works of William James. Vol. 10. Cambridge – London: Harvard University Press.
James William . 1979. The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. The Works of William James. Vol. 6. Cambridge – London: Harvard University Press.
James William . 1982. The Principles of Psychology. Vol. 1, The Works of William James , Vol. 8/1. Cambridge – London: Harvard University Press.
Latour Bruno . 1991. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lewis, Simon / Maslin, Mark Andrew. 2015. “Defining the Anthropocene”, Nature 519, pp. 171–180.
Livingston Alexander . 2016. Damn great Empires! William James and the Politics of Pragmatism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pihlström Sami . 2008. The Trail of the Human Serpent is Over Everything. Jamesian Perspectives on Mind, World, and Religion. Lanham et al.: University Press of America.
Porrovecchio Mark J. 2011. F.C.S. Schiller and the Dawn of Pragmatism. The Rhetoric of a Philosophical Rebel. Lanham et al.: Lexington Books.
Schiller, Ferdinand Canning Scott. 1929. Logic for Use: An Introduction to the Voluntarist Theory of Knowledge. London: G. Bell.
Schiller, Ferdinand Canning Scott. 1903. Humanism. Philosophical Essays. London: Macmillan and Co.
Schiller, Ferdinand Canning Scott. 1912. Studies in Humanism. London et al.: Macmillan and Co 2. Edition.
Schiller, Ferdinand Canning Scott. 1939. Our Human Truths. New York: Columbia University Press.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1097 | 193 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 65 | 12 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 118 | 28 | 0 |
Humanism is charged with fostering a harmful anthropocentrism that has led to the exploitation of non-human beings and the environment. Posthumanist and transhumanist ideas prominently aim at rethinking our self-understanding and human-nature relations. Yet these approaches turn out to be flawed when it comes to addressing the challenges of the “age of the humanity”, the Anthropocene. Whereas posthumanism fails in acknowledging the exceptional role of human beings with regard to political agency and responsibility, transhumanism overemphasizes human capabilities of controlling nature and only deepens the human-nature dualism. Therefore, a critical and humble version of humanism is suggested as a viable alternative. Drawing on pragmatist thinkers William James and F.C.S. Schiller, a resource for de-centering the human being is provided that critically reflects our role in the larger ecosystem and underlines human potentials as well as human responsibilities.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1097 | 193 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 65 | 12 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 118 | 28 | 0 |