On the Legitimate Means for Political Action: John Dewey and the Spectator’s View on Politics
In: Contemporary PragmatismSearch for other papers by Coen Schuckink Kool in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
As public concern over governmental inaction on climate change grows, it becomes vital to answer the Question of Legitimate Means: what actions can political actors legitimately take to pursue their goals? This paper argues that a particular understanding of the political realm, which I will call the spectator’s view on politics, prevents theorists from confronting this question. Using the philosophy of Noortje Marres, I will demonstrate that the spectator’s view posits a transcendental goal to politics, subordinating any means to the realization of this goal. I will then contrast this view with the political philosophy of John Dewey. Dewey’s approach not only makes it possible to answer the Question of Legitimate Means, but highlights its importance to any democratic project.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Achenbach, Joel. “Two Mass Killings a World Apart Share a Common Theme: ‘Ecofascism.’” Washington Post, August 18, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/two-mass-murders-a-world-apart-share-a-common-theme-ecofascism/2019/08/18/0079a676-bec4-11e9-b873-63ace636af08_story.html (Accessed 15 June 2024).
-
Arendt, Hannah. The Promise of Politics. Translated by Jerome Kohn. New York: Schoken books, 2005.
-
Bohman, James. “Realizing Deliberative Democracy as a Mode of Inquiry: Pragmatism, Social Facts, and Normative Theory.” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18, no. 1 (2004): 23–43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25670495.
-
Caldwell, Peter C. “Controversies over Carl Schmitt: A Review of Recent Literature.” The Journal of Modern History 77, no. 2 (2005): 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1086/431819.
-
Cho, Charles H., Martin L. Martens, Hakkyun Kim, and Michelle Rodrigue. “Astroturfing Global Warming: It Isn’t Always Greener on the Other Side of the Fence.” Journal of Business Ethics 104, no. 4 (2011): 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0950-6.
-
Dewey, John. Liberalism and Social Action. New York: G.P. Putnam, 1935.
-
Dewey, John. The Political Writings. Edited by Debra Morris and Ian Shapiro. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993.
-
Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry. Edited by Melvin L. Rogers. Athens, Ohio: Swallow Press, 2016.
-
Festenstein, Matthew. “Inquiry as Critique: On the Legacy of Deweyan Pragmatism for Political Theory.” Political Studies 49, no. 4 (2001): 730–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00339.
-
Forstenzer, Joshua. Deweyan Experimentalism and the Problem of Method in Political Philosophy. New York: Routledge, 2021.
-
Harman, Graham. Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political. London: Pluto Press, 2015.
-
Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. London: Vintage, 1994.
-
Hildreth, R. W. “Reconstructing Dewey on Power.” Political Theory 37, no. 6 (2009): 780–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591709345454.
-
Jackson, Jeff. Equality beyond Debate: John Dewey’s Pragmatic Idea of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
-
Kosnoski, Jason. “Artful Discussion: John Dewey’s Classroom as a Model of Deliberative Association.” Political Theory 33, no. 5 (2005): 654–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591704272542.
-
Latour, Bruno. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Translated by Catherine Porter. London: Harvard University Press, 2018.
-
Latour, Bruno. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2018.
-
Lee, Mordecai. The Philosopher-Lobbyist: John Dewey and the People’s Lobby, 1928–1940. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2015.
-
Lippmann, Walter. The Phantom Public. Milton Keynes: Lightning Source, [1925] 2020.
-
Lippmann, Walter. Public Opinion. Blacksburg: Wilder Publications, 1922.
-
Livingston, Alexander. “Between Means and Ends: Reconstructing Coercion in Dewey’s Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review 111, no. 3 (2017): 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000168.
-
MacGilvray, Eric. “Dewey’s Public.” Contemporary Pragmatism 7, no. 1 (2010): 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-90000154.
-
Malm, Andreas. Corona, Climate, Chronic Emergency: War Communism in the Twenty-First Century. London: Verso, 2020.
-
Manavis, Sarah. “Eco-Fascism: The Ideology Marrying Environmentalism and White Supremacy Thriving Online.” New Statesman, September 21, 2018. https://www.newstatesman.com/science-tech/2018/09/eco-fascism-ideology-marrying-environmentalism-and-white-supremacy.
-
Mann, Geoff, and Joel, Wainwright. Climate Leviathan: A Political Theory of Our Planetary Future. London: Verso, 2020.
-
Marres, Noortje. “Issues Spark a Public into Being: A Key but Often Forgotten Point of the Lippmann-Dewey Debate.” In Making Things Public, edited by Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel, 208–217. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005a.
-
Marres, Noortje. “No Issue, No Public: Democratic Deficits after the Displacement of Politics.” PhD diss. University of Amsterdam, 2005b.
-
Marres, Noortje. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment, and Everyday Publics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
-
Marres, Noortje. “How to Turn Politics Around: Things, the Earth, Ecology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 48, no. 5 (2023): 973–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439231190884.
-
Miller, David. On Nationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.
-
Mittiga, Ross. “Political Legitimacy, Authoritarianism, and Climate Change.” American Political Science Review 116, no. 3 (2022): 998–1011. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421001301.
-
Moore, Edward C. American Pragmatism: Peirce, James, Dewey. New York: Columbia University Press, 1961.
-
Mouffe, Chantal. The Return of the Political. London: Verso, 2005.
-
Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. London: Bloomsbury, 2012.
-
Pasternak, Avia. “Political Rioting: A Moral Assessment.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 46, no. 4 (2018): 384–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12132.
-
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1979.
-
Rogers, Melvin L. “Dewey and His Vision of Democracy.” Contemporary Pragmatism 7, no. 1 (2010): 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-90000156.
-
Schmitt, Carl. The Concept of the Political. Translated by Georg Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
-
Scott, James C. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2020.
-
Walker, Edward T., and Andrew N. Le. “Poisoning the Well: How Astroturfing Harms Trust in Advocacy Organizations.” Social Currents 10, no. 2 (2023): 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965221123808.
-
Warner, Michael. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books, 2010.
-
Westbrook, Robert B. John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.
-
Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2006.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 159 | 159 | 16 |
| Full Text Views | 6 | 6 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 198 | 198 | 11 |
On the Legitimate Means for Political Action: John Dewey and the Spectator’s View on Politics
In: Contemporary PragmatismSearch for other papers by Coen Schuckink Kool in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
As public concern over governmental inaction on climate change grows, it becomes vital to answer the Question of Legitimate Means: what actions can political actors legitimately take to pursue their goals? This paper argues that a particular understanding of the political realm, which I will call the spectator’s view on politics, prevents theorists from confronting this question. Using the philosophy of Noortje Marres, I will demonstrate that the spectator’s view posits a transcendental goal to politics, subordinating any means to the realization of this goal. I will then contrast this view with the political philosophy of John Dewey. Dewey’s approach not only makes it possible to answer the Question of Legitimate Means, but highlights its importance to any democratic project.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 159 | 159 | 16 |
| Full Text Views | 6 | 6 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 198 | 198 | 11 |