This paper examines the well-known pragmatist claim to mediate between philosophical disputes. While recognizing the reconciliatory and harmonizing role that pragmatism plays in traditional debates between, for example, realism and antirealism, naturalism and culturalism, or science and religion, it is argued that the pragmatist also needs to acknowledge that there are situations in which no such mediation is reasonably possible, such as the conflict between racism and antiracism. The metaphilosophical question to be raised is how – in terms of pragmatism itself – we are able to distinguish between these different cases and what exactly it means to apply the pragmatic method to resolving this meta-level issue. Pragmatism here emerges as a thoroughly fallible and antifoundationalist reflexive inquiry into what it means, and what it ought to mean, for us to view philosophical issues in terms of their conceivable practical consequences. The project of mediation must be subordinated to this more fundamental understanding of pragmatist methodology.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Baghramian, Maria and Marchetti, Sarin (eds.) (2018). Pragmatism and the European Traditions: Encounters with Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology before the Great Divide. London and New York: Routledge.
Burke, F. Thomas (2013). What Pragmatism Was. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Dewey, John (1986 [1925, 1929]). Experience and Nature. Chicago: Open Court.
Dewey, John (1991 [1934]). A Common Faith. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
Dreon, Roberta (2022). Human Landscapes: Contributions to a Pragmatist Anthropology. Albany: SUNY Press.
Gaita, Raimond (2004 [1991]). Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception. London and New York: Routledge.
James, William (1979 [1897]). The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. Eds. Frederick H. Burkhardt, Fredson Bowers, and Ignas K. Skrupskelis. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
James, William (1983 [1899]). Talks to Teachers on Psychology and to Students on Some of Life’s Ideals. Eds. Frederick H. Burkhardt, Fredson Bowers, and Ignas K. Skrupskelis. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
James, William (1975 [1907]). Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Eds. Frederick H. Burkhardt, Fredson Bowers, and Ignas K. Skrupskelis. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
Jung, Matthias (2019). Science, Humanism, and Religion: The Quest for Orientation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Legg, Catherine (2021 [2008]). “Pragmatism”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pragmatism/.
Margalit, Avishai (2009). On Compromise and Rotten Compromises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Peirce, Charles S. (1992–98). The Essential Peirce, 2 vols. The Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Pihlström, Sami (2009). Pragmatist Metaphysics: An Essay on the Ethical Grounds of Ontology. London and New York: Continuum.
Pihlström, Sami (2013). Pragmatic Pluralism and the Problem of God. New York: Fordham University Press.
Pihlström, Sami (2021). Pragmatist Truth in the Post-Truth Age: Sincerity, Normativity, and Humanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pihlström, Sami (2023). Humanism, Antitheodicism, and the Critique of Meaning in Pragmatist Philosophy of Religion. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
Pihlström, Sami (ed.) (2024). The Bloomsbury Handbook of Pragmatism. London and New York: Bloomsbury, forthcoming.
Plantinga, Alvin (2000). Warranted Christian Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Popper, Karl R. (1945). The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Putnam, Hilary (1981). Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, Hilary (1990). Realism with a Human Face. Ed. James Conant. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
Putnam, Hilary (1997). “God and the Philosophers”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31, 175–187.
Putnam, Hilary and Putnam, Ruth Anna (2017). Pragmatism as a Way of Life: The Lasting Legacy of William James and John Dewey. Cambridge, MA and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rorty, Richard (1991). Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Santayana, George (1989 [1900]). Interpretations of Poetry and Religion. Ed. William G. Holzberger. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Scheffler, Israel (1974). Four Pragmatists. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Sullivan, Shannon (2024). “Race”. Forthcoming in Sami Pihlström (ed.), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Pragmatism. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
Swinburne, Richard (1979). The Existence of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
White, Morton (2002). A Philosophy of Culture: The Scope of Holistic Pragmatism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 86 | 11 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 214 | 210 | 23 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 846 | 840 | 98 |
This paper examines the well-known pragmatist claim to mediate between philosophical disputes. While recognizing the reconciliatory and harmonizing role that pragmatism plays in traditional debates between, for example, realism and antirealism, naturalism and culturalism, or science and religion, it is argued that the pragmatist also needs to acknowledge that there are situations in which no such mediation is reasonably possible, such as the conflict between racism and antiracism. The metaphilosophical question to be raised is how – in terms of pragmatism itself – we are able to distinguish between these different cases and what exactly it means to apply the pragmatic method to resolving this meta-level issue. Pragmatism here emerges as a thoroughly fallible and antifoundationalist reflexive inquiry into what it means, and what it ought to mean, for us to view philosophical issues in terms of their conceivable practical consequences. The project of mediation must be subordinated to this more fundamental understanding of pragmatist methodology.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 86 | 11 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 214 | 210 | 23 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 846 | 840 | 98 |