Cognitive Linguistics in the Year 2015

In: Cognitive Semantics
View More View Less
  • 1 The Arctic University of Norway

Cognitive linguistics views linguistic cognition as indistinguishable from general cognition and thus seeks explanation of linguistic phenomena in terms of general cognitive strategies, such as metaphor, metonymy, and blending. Grammar and lexicon are viewed as parts of a single continuum and thus expected to be subject to the same cognitive strategies. Significant developments within cognitive linguistics in the past two decades include construction grammar and the application of quantitative methods to analyses.

  • Arppe Antti. 2014. Package “ndl”. cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ndl/ndl.pdf.

  • Baayen R. Harald. 2011. Corpus linguistics and naive discriminative learning. Brazilian Journal of Applied Linguistics 11:295328.

  • Barcelona Antonio, . 2002. Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics: an update. In: Rene Dirven, and Pörings R. (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (Cognitive Linguistics Research 20.), 207278. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Churchland , Patricia. 1986. Neurophilosophy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Coleman Linda, , and Kay Paul. 1981. Prototype semantics: The English verb lie. Language 57: 2644.

  • Croft William. 1993. The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Metaphors and Metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics 4:335370.

  • Croft William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Croft William. 2006. On explaining metonymy: Comment on Peirsman and Geeraerts, Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics 17:317326.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Croft William, , and Cruse D. Alan. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Dąbrowska Ewa. 2004. Language, Mind and Brain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  • Dąbrowska Ewa, and Dagmar Divjak (eds.). 2015. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 39). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Divjak Dagmar. 2006. Ways of intending: Delineating and structuring near- synonyms. In: Stefan Gries and Anatol Stefnaowitsch (eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics, v. 2: The Syntax-Lexis Interface, 1956. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Divjak Dagmar, , and Stefan Th. Gries. 2006. Ways of trying in Russian: clustering behavioral profiles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2:2360.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Endresen Anna. 2014. Non-Standard Allomorphy in Russian Prefixes: Corpus, Experimental, and Statistical Exploration. PhD dissertation. UiT, The Arctic University of Norway.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fauconnier Gilles. 1985. Mental Spaces. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.

  • Fauconnier Gilles, , and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Feldman Jerome A.2006. From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge, ma: mit Press.

  • Fillmore Charles. 1985. Syntactic intrusions and the notion of grammatical construction. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 11:7386.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Geeraerts Dirk, . 1987. Cognitive Grammar and the History of Lexical Semantics. In: Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.). Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, 647678. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Geeraerts Dirk, . 2002. The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions. In: René Dirven, and Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, 43 5465. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Geeraerts Dirk, , and Hubert Cuyckens. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Goldberg Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  • Goldberg Adele (ed.). 1996. Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Goldberg Adele. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalizations in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Goossens Louis. 1990. Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions for Linguistic Action. Cognitive Linguistics 1:323340.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jakobson Roman O., [1956]1980. Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. In: Roman Jakobson, and Morris Halle (eds.), Fundamentals of Language, 679 6. The Hague: Mouton.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janda Laura A.1993a. The Shape of the Indirect Object in Central and Eastern Europe. Slavic and East European Journal 37:53 3563.

  • Janda Laura A.1993b. Cognitive linguistics as a continuation of the Jakobsonian tradition: the semantics of Russian and Czech reflexives. In: Robert A. Maguire and Alan Timberlake (eds.), American Contributions to the Eleventh International Congress of Slavists in Bratislava, 310319. Columbus, oh: Slavica.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janda Laura A.1993c. A Geography of Case Semantics: The Czech Dative and the Russian Instrumental (=Cognitive Linguistics Research, v. 4). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janda Laura A.1996a. Back from the brink: a study of how relic forms in languages serve as source material for analogical extension (= LINCOM Studies in Slavic Linguistics 01). Munich/Newcastle: LINCOM EUROPA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janda Laura A., 1996b. Unpacking Markedness. In: Eugene Casad (ed.), Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, 207233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janda Laura A.1998. Linguistic innovation from defunct morphology: Old dual endings in Polish and Russian. In: Robert A. Maguire and Alan Timberlake (eds.), American Contributions to the Twelfth International Congress of Slavists, 431443. Bloomington, in: Slavica.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janda Laura A., 1999a. Whence virility? The rise of a new gender distinction in the history of Slavic. In: Mills Margaret H. (ed.), Slavic Gender Linguistics, 201228. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janda Laura A., 1999b. Peircean semiotics and cognitive linguistics: a case study of the Russian genitive. In: Michael Shapiro(ed.), The Peirce Seminar Papers, 441466. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janda Laura A.2000. A cognitive model of the Russian accusative case. In: R. K. Potapova, V. D. Solov’ev, and V. N. Poljakov, Trudy Medunarodnoj Konferencii Kognitivnoe Modelirovanie, 2043. Moscow: MISIS.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janda Laura A.2004. A metaphor in search of a source domain: the categories of Slavic aspect. Cognitive Linguistics 15:471527.

  • Janda Laura A.2008. From Cognitive Linguistics to Cultural Linguistics. Slovo a smysl/Word and Sense 8:4868.

  • Janda Laura A.2011. Metonymy in word-formation. Cognitive Linguistics 22:359392.

  • Janda Laura A., 2013. Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Linguistics In Janda Laura A., ed. Cognitive Linguistics: The Quantitative Turn. The Essential Reader, 132. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janda Laura A., , and Valery Solovyev. 2009. What Constructional Profiles Reveal About Synonymy: A Case Study of Russian Words for sadness and happiness. Cognitive Linguistics 20:367393.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kay Paul, , and Fillmore Charles J.. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the what’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75:134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kövecses Zoltán, , and Günter Radden. 1998. “Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic View” Cognitive Linguistics 9:3777.

  • Lakoff George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Lakoff George, , and Mark Turner. 1989. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Lamb Sydney M.1999. Pathways of the Brain. The Neurocognitive Basis of Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Langacker Ronald W.1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. I. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Langacker Ronald W.1991a. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Langacker Ronald W.1991b. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II. Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Langacker Ronald W.1993. Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 4:138.

  • Langacker Ronald W.2003. Constructional integration, grammaticization, and serial verb constructions. Language and Linguistics 4:251278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Langacker Ronald W.2006. On the continuous debate about discreteness. Cognitive Linguistics 17:107151.

  • Langacker Ronald W.2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Langacker Ronald W.2009. Metonymic grammar. In: Klaus-Uwe Panther, Linda L. Thornburg, and Antonio Barcelona (eds.), Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar, 4571. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Langacker Ronald W.Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk Barbara. 2007. Polysemy, prototypes and radial categories. In: Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 139169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newman John, , and Sally Rice. 2006. Transitivity schemas of English eat and drink in the bnc. In: Stefan Th. Gries and Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis, 225260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Östman Jan-Ola, , and Mirjam Fried (eds.). 2005. Construction Grammars. Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Bejnamins.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Palmer Gary B.1996. Toward a Theory of Cultural Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.

  • Panther Klaus-Uwe, , and Linda Thornburg. 1999. The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian. In: Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought, 337357. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peirsman Yves, , and Dirk Geeraerts. 2006. Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics 17:269316.

  • Putnam Hilary. 1981. Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Radden Günter, , and Zoltán Kövecses. 1999. Towards a theory of metonymy. In: Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought, 1759. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, , Francisco J., 2000. The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In: Antonio Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective, 109132. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saj A., , Fuhrman , O., , Vuilleumier P., , & Boroditsky L.2013. Patients With Left Spatial Neglect Also Neglect the “Left Side” of Time. Psychological Science. doi: 10.1177/0956797612475222.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmid Hans-Jörg. 2000. English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells. (= Topics in English Linguistics 34). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Schmid Hans-Jörg. 2007a. Does frequency in text really instantiate entrenchment in the cognitive system? Paper presented at International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Krakow, Poland.

  • Schmid Hans-Jörg. 2007b. Entrenchment, salience and basic levels. In: Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 117138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Steels Luc. 2011. Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. Constructional Approaches to Language (Vol. 11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stefanowitsch Anatol. 2006a. Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In Anatol Stefanowitsch and Stefan Th. Gries (eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy (Trends in Linguistics 171), 116. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stefanowitsch Anatol. 2006b. Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In Anatol Stefanowitsch and Stefan Th. Gries (eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy (Trends in Linguistics 171), 61105. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stefanowitsch Anatol, , and Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8:209243.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stefanowitsch Anatol, , and Stefan Th. Gries.2005. Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1:143.

  • Sweetser Eve E.1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor John R.1995. Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Taylor John R.2002. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Turner Mark. 1987. Death Is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Turner Mark. 1996. The Literary Mind: The Origins of Thought and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Ungerer Friedrich, and Hans-Jörg Schmid. 1996. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London/New York: Longman.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 341 183 9
Full Text Views 237 19 1
PDF Downloads 36 15 1