Key Metaphors in the Sociology of Professions: Occupations as Hierarchies and Landscapes

in Comparative Sociology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Key metaphors guide our way of thinking in that, among other things, they provide perspective, relations, directions, distances, causality, features, and principles. The literature on professions appears to encompass at least two overarching key metaphors, one that likens professional groups to a hierarchy, and another that describes them as a landscape. This article provides an analysis of two key metaphors in the literature on professions, the purpose being to outline, analyse, and relate them to a number of other central concepts. In carrying out this analysis, questions relating to the similarities and differences between the two metaphors will be addressed. What are their epistemic virtues, and what are the consequences of privileging one metaphor over the other?

Key Metaphors in the Sociology of Professions: Occupations as Hierarchies and Landscapes

in Comparative Sociology

Sections

References

AbbottA. The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor 1988 University of Chicago Press

AbbottA. “Boundaries of social work or social work of boundaries?” The Social Service Review 1995a 69 4 545 562

AbbottA. “Things of boundaries.” Social Research 1995b 62 4 857 885

ÅkerströmM. Slaps, punches, pinches – but not violence: Boundary-work in nursing homes for the elderly Symbolic Interaction 2002 25 4 515 536

AllenD. “Doing occupational demarcation: The “boundary-work” of nurse managers in a district general hospital.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 2000 29 3 326 356

AllenD. “Narrating nursing jurisdiction: ‘Atrocity stories’ and ‘boundary-work’ ” Symbolic Interaction 2001 24 1 75 103

BecherT.TrowlerP. R. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines 2001 2nd ed. Philadelphia Open University Press

BechkyB. A. “Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction” The American Journal of Sociology 2003 109 3 720 752

BlackM. OrtonyA. “More about metaphor” Metaphor and thought 1993 2 ed. Cambridge University

BourdieuP. “The social space and the genesis of groups.” Theory and Society 1985 14 6 723 744

BourdieuP. “Social space and symbolic power.” Sociological Theory 1989 7 1 14 25

BoydR. OrtonyA. “Metaphor and theory change: What is ‘metaphor’ a metaphor for?” Metaphor and thought 1993 2nd ed. Cambridge University

BranteT. BurrageM.TorstendahlR. “Professional types as a strategy of analysis.” Professions in theory and history: Rethinking the study of the professions 1990 London Sage

BurrageM.JarauschK.SiegristH. BurrageM.TorstendahlR. “An actor-based framework for the study of the professions.” Professions in theory and history: Rethinking the study of the professions 1990 London Sage

CollinsR. The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification 1979 New York Academic Press

CollinsR. BurrageM.TorstendahlR. “Market closure and the conflict theory of the professions.” Professions in theory and history: Rethinking the study of the professions 1990 London Sage

DerberC. “Managing professionals: Ideological proletarianization and post-industrial labor.” Theory and Society 1983 12 3 309 341

DerberC.SchwartzW. A. “New mandarins or new proletariat?: Professional powers at work.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations 1991 8 71 96

DiMaggioP. “Culture and Cognition.” Annual Review of Sociology 1997 23 263 287

DingwallR.KingM. D. “Herbert Spencer and the professions: Occupational ecology reconsidered.” Sociological Theory 1995 13 1 14 24

DurkheimE. The division of labor in society 1964 New York Free Press

EtzioniA. The semi-professions and their organization: Teachers nurses social workers 1969 New York Free Press

EvettsJ. SvenssonL. G.EvettsJ. “Reinterpreting professionalism: As discourse of social control and occupational change.” Conceptual and comparative studies of continental and anglo-american professions 2003 Södertälje Almqvist & Wiksell International

EvettsJ. “Trust and professionalism: Challenges and occupational changes.” Current Sociology 2006 54 4 515 531

EvettsJ. “Professionalism and managerialism: Organizational control ‘from a distance’.” 2007 Paper presented at the 8th Conference of the European Sociological Association: Conflict, Citizenship and Civic Society

FisherD. CozzenS. E.GierynT. F. “Boundary work and science: The relation between power and knowledge.” Theories of science in society 1990 Bloomington Indiana University

FlexnerA. “Is social work a profession?” School and Society 1915 1 26 901 911

FouconnierG.TurnerM. GibbsR. W. J. “Rethinking metaphor.” The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought 2008 Cambridge Cambridge University

FournierV. MalinN. “Boundary work and the (un)making of the professions.” Professionalism boundaries and the workplace 2000 London Routledge

FreidsonE. “The division of labor as social interaction.” Social Problems 1975 23 1 305 313

FreidsonE. StaceyM.ReidM.HeathC.DingwallR. “The futures of professionalization.” Health and the division of labour 1977 London Croom Helm

FreidsonE. StewardP. L.CantorM. G. “Occupational autonomy and labor market shelters.” Varieties of work 1982 Beverly Hills Sage

FreidsonE. Professionalism: The third logic 2001 Chicago University of Chicago

GeertzC. Thick Description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture The interpretation of cultures 1973 New York Basic Books

GentnerD. “Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy.” Cognitive Science 1983 7 2 155 170

GentnerD.BowdleB. GibbsR. W. J. “Metaphor as structure-mapping.” The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought 2008 Cambridge Cambridge University

GibbsR. W. J. GibbsR. W. J. “Metaphor and thought: State of the art.” The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought 2008 Cambridge Cambridge University

GiereR. N. How models are used to represent reality Philosophy of Science 2004 71 742 752

GierynT. F. “Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists.” American Sociological Review 1983 48 6 781 795

GierynT. F. Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line 1999 Chicago University of Chicago

GlucksbergS. GibbsR. W. J. “How metaphors create categories – quickly.” The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought 2008 Cambridge Cambridge University

GrantD.OswickC. GrantD.OswickC. “Getting the measure of metaphors.” Organizational metaphors 1996a London Sage

GrantD.OswickC. Metaphor and organizations 1996b London Sage

GreenwoodE. “Attributes of a profession.” Social Work 1957 2 45 55

HallbergM.BragesjöF. Konflikt eller konsensus?: Om kontroversstudier som forskningsfält 2003 Stockholm Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap (FAS)

HeracleousL. Boundaries in the study of organizations Human Relations 2004 57 1 95 103

HolmquestA. “The rhetorical strategy of boundary-work.” Argumentation 1990 4 3 235 258

InnsD. “Metaphor in the literature of organizational analysis: A preliminary taxonomy and a glimpse at a humanities-based perspective.” Organization 2002 9 2 305 330

JohnssonM. GibbsR. W. J. “Philosophy’s debt to metaphor.” The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought 2008 Cambridge Cambridge University

KrauseE. A. The sociology of professions 1971 Little, Brown and Company

KreckelR. “Unequal opportunity structure and labor market segmentation.” Sociology 1980 14 4 525 550

KuhlmannE. KuhlmannE.SaksM. “Governing beyond markets and managerialism: Professions as mediators.” Rethinking professional governance: International directions in healthcare 2008 Bristol Policy Press

KuhnT. S. OrtonyA. “Metaphor in science.” Metaphor and thought 1993 New York Cambridge University

KövecsesZ. Metaphor: A practical introduction 2002 New York Oxford University

LakoffG. GibbsR. W. J. “The neural theory of metaphor.” The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought 2008 Cambridge Cambridge University

LakoffG.JohnsonM. Metaphors we live by 1980 University of Chicago

LamontM. “Symbolic boundaries.” http://www.people.virginia.edu/~bb3v/symbound/papers2001/LamontEncyclo.html 2001

LamontM.MolnárV. “The study of boundaries in the social sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 2002 28 167 195

LarkinG. Occupational monopoly and modern medicine 1983 London Tavistock

LarsonM. S. The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis 1977 Berkeley University of California

LightD. W. “Turf battles and the theory of professional dominance.” Research in the Sociology of Health Care 1988 7 203 225

LiljegrenA. Pragmatic professionalism: Micro level discourse in social work European Journal of Social Work 2011 1 18

LiljegrenA.DellgranP.HöjerS. The heroine and the capitalist: The professions debate about privatization in Swedish social work European Journal of Social Work 2008 11 3 195 208

MacDonaldK. M. The sociology of the professions 1995 London Sage

MacLureM. “Telling transitions: Boundary work in narratives of becoming an action researcher.” British Educational Research Journal 1996 22 3 273 287

MalatestaM. “Comments on Sciulli.” Current Sociology 2005 53 6 943 946

McClellandC. E. TorstendahlR.BurrageM. “Escape from freedom? Reflections on German professionalization, 1870–1933.” The formation of professions: Knowledge state and strategy 1990 London Sage

MellorF. “Between fact and fiction: Demarcating science from non-science in popular physics books.” Social Studies of Science 2003 33 4 509 538

MillerG. A. OrtonyA. “Images and models, similes and metaphors.” Metaphor and thought 1993 Cambridge Cambridge University

MintzbergH. Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations 1999 Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey Prentice-Hall

MorganG. Images of organization 2006 Updated ed. Thousand Oaks Sage

MurphyR. The struggle for scholarly recognition: The development of the closure problematic in sociology Theory and Society 1983 12 5 631 658

MurphyR. Social closure: The theory of monopolization and exclusion 1988 Oxford Clarendon Press

NorrisP. “How ‘we’ are different from ‘them’: Occupational boundary maintenance in the treatment of musculo-skeletal problems.” Sociology of Health and Illness 2001 23 1 24 43

OrtonyA. The role of similarities in similes and metaphors Metaphor and thought 1993 Cambridge Cambridge University

ParkinF. Marxism and class theory: A bourgeois critique 1979 London Tavistock

PavalkoR. M. Sociology of occupations and professions 1971 Itasca Peacock

PressmanJ. L.WildavskyA. B. Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland: Or why it’s amazing that federal programs work at all this being a saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation of ruined hopes 1984 3rd ed. Berkeley University of California

SaksM. Professions and the public interest: Medical power altruism and alternative medicine 1995 London Routledge

SchmittR. Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research Qualitative Report 2005 10 2 358 394

SchönD. A. OrtonyA. “Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy” Metaphor and thought 1993 2nd ed. Cambridge Cambridge University

SciulliD. “Continental sociology of the professions today: Conceptual contributions.” Current Sociology 2005a 53 6 915 942

SciulliD. “Escaping without eliding an Atlantic divide, etymological and conceptual.” Current Sociology 2005b 53 6 952 958

SciulliD. Professions in Civil Society and the State: Invariant Foundations and Consequences 2009 Boston Brill Academic

SilberI. F. “Space, fields, boundaries: The rise of spatial metaphors in contemporary sociological theory.” Social Research 1995 62 2 323 357

StarS.GriesemerJ. “Institutional ecology, ‘transitions’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 1989 19 3 387 420

SteenG. J. Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research 2007 Amsterdam John Benjamin Publishing

StraussA. L. DenzinN. K. “Social worlds and legitimation processes.” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 1982 London Jai Press

ThompsonJ. A.BunersonS. J. “Work-Nonwork conflict and the phenomenon of time: Beyond the balance metaphor.” Work and Occupations 2001 28 1 17 39

TillyC. “Social boundary mechanisms.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2004 34 2 211 236

TorstendahlR. “The need for a definition of ‘professions’.” Current Sociology 2005 53 6 947 951

TsoukasH. “Analogical reasoning and knowledge generation in organization theory.” Organization studies 1993 14 3 323 346

Van DijkT. A. Van DijkT. A. “Discourse as interaction in society.” Discourse as social interaction 1997 London Sage

Van DijkT. A. Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach 1998 London Sage

WatsonG. “Social construction of boundaries between social and cultural anthropology in Britain and North America.” Journal of Anthropological Research 1984 40 3 351 366

WeberM.RothG.WittichC. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology 1978 Berkeley University of California

WetherellM.PotterJ. AntakiC. “Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretative repertoires.” Analysing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods 1988 London Sage

WitzA. Patriarchy and professions: The gendered politics of occupational closure Sociology 1990 24 4 675 690

WitzA. Professions and patriarchy 1992 London Routledge

4)

See Gieryn (1995) for a slightly different taxonomy.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 66 66 46
Full Text Views 93 93 82
PDF Downloads 4 4 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0