Creating a ‘We-feeling’ in Heterogeneous Nations: A Cross-country Investigation of the Impact of Inclusion and Autonomy on the National Pride of Ethnic Minorities

in Comparative Sociology
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

In this contribution, we investigate the impact of different institutions on ethnic minorities’ political support. Based on a hierarchical cross-country comparison, we first show that individuals belonging to ethnic minorities have less national identity than the majority groups within the same country. We then test whether this negative effect of belonging to ethnic minorities can be attenuated by institutions. First, we argue that the inclusion of ethnic minorities by power-sharing institutions gives them the possibility to have a say in politics and, therefore, they develop a sense of common identity. Second, when minority groups are given the autonomy to preserve their group identity, e.g., in federal units, they develop positive feelings for the whole nation and finally a national identity. Our multilevel analyses show that autonomy indeed attenuates the negative effect of minority status on national pride, but that this is not the case for inclusive institutions. In light of increasing heterogeneisation of societies because of migration and denationalization, our findings contribute to the discussion on the relationship between growing ethnic pluralism and good functioning of democratic regimes.

Creating a ‘We-feeling’ in Heterogeneous Nations: A Cross-country Investigation of the Impact of Inclusion and Autonomy on the National Pride of Ethnic Minorities

in Comparative Sociology

Sections

References

African Election Database African Election Database. A database of election results in Sub-Sahara Africa 2011 Online: http://africanelections.tripod.com/ [retrieved: 25.03.2011].

AlesinaA.WacziargR. PharrS. J.PutnamR. “The economics of civic trust: what’s troubling the trilateral countries?” Disaffected democracies 2000 Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press

AlesinaA.DevleeschauwerA.EasterlyW.KurlatS.WacziargR. “Fractionalization” Journal of Economic Growth 2003 8 155 194

AndersonB. Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism 1991 London Verso

AndersonC. J. ‘‘Party systems and satisfaction with democracy in the new Europe’’ Political Studies 1998 46 4 572 588

AndersonC. J.GuilloryC. A. “Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems” The American Political Science Review 1997 91 1 66 81

BanducciS. A.DonovanT.KarpJ. A. “Proportional representation and attitudes about politics: Results from New Zealand” Electoral Studies 1999 18 533 555

BramborT.ClarkW. R.GolderM. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis” Political Analysis 2005 13 1 20

ClarkeH. D.DuttN.KornbergA. “The political economy of attitudes toward polity and society in western European democracies” The Journal of Politics 1993 55 4 998 1021

DahlR. A. ‘‘The city in the Future of democracy’’ American Political Science Review 1967 61 4 953 970

DaltonR. J. NorrisP. “Political support in advanced industrial democracies” Critical citizens. Global support for democratic governance 1999 New York Oxford University Press 57 77

DaltonR. J. Democratic challenges democratic choices. The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies 2004 New York Oxford University Press

EastonD. A framework for political analysis 1965a Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall

EastonD. A systems analysis of political life 1965b New York/London/Sydney John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

EastonD. “A re-assessment of the concept of political support” British Journal of Political Science 1975 5 4 435 457

EastonD. “Theoretical approaches to political support” Canadian Journal of Political Science 1976 9 3 431 448

GerringJ.ThackerS. “Political institutions and corruption: The role of unitarism and parliamentarism” British Journal of Political Science 2005 34 2 295 330

HeldD. Models of Democracy 2006 Cambridge Polity

HoxJ. J. Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications 2010 London Routledge

HuddyL.KhatibN. “American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement” American Journal of Political Science 2007 51 1 63 77

JohnsonJ. W.WallackJ. S. Electoral Systems and the Personal Vote. Update of database from “Particularism around the World” 2006 Online: http://dss.ucsd.edu/~jwjohnso/espv.html.

JonesK. WestertG. P.VerhoeffR. N. “Multilevel approaches to modelling contextuality: From nuisance to substance in the analysis of voting behaviour” Places and people: Multilevel modelling in geographical research 1997 Utrecht The Royal Dutch Geographical Society 19 43

KeeferP. Database of Political Institutions: Changes and Variable Definitions 2007 Online im Internet: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRES/Resources/469232-1107449512766/dpi2006_vote_share_variable_definitions.pdf [Stand: 14.10.2010].

KlingemannH.-D. NorrisP. “Mapping political support in the 1990s: A global analysis” Critical citizens. Global support for democratic governance 1999 New York Oxford University Press 31 56

LijphartA. “Consociational democracy” World Politics 1969 21 207 225

LijphartA. Democracy in plural Societies: A comparative exploration 1977 New Haven Yale University Press

LijphartA. Democracies 1984 New Haven Yale University Press

LijphartA. “Proportional representation: Double checking the evidence” Journal of Democracy 1991 2 42 48

LijphartA. Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in 36 countries 1999 New Haven Yale University Press

LijphartA. “Constitutional design for divided societies” Journal of Democracy 2004 15 2 96 109

Minority at Risk Project Data 2011 Online; http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/data.asp [Retrieved: 14.03.2011].

MatsubayashiT. “Population size, local autonomy, and support for the political system” Social Science Quarterly 2007 88 3 830 849

McallisterI. NorrisP. “The economic performance of governments” Critical citizens. Global support for democratic governance 1999 New York Oxford University Press 188 203

NordsiekW. Parties and Elections. The database about parliamentary elections and political parties in Europe 2010 Online: http://www.parties-and-elections.de/ [retrieved: 25.03.2011].

NorrisP. NorrisP. “Institutional explanations for political support” Critical citizens. Global support for democratic governance 1999 New York Oxford University Press 217 235

NorrisP. Electoral engineering. Voting rules and political behaviour 2004 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

NorrisP. “Stable democracy and good governance in divided societies: Do powersharing Institutions work?” Faculty Research Working Papers Series 2005 February

QianY.WeingastB. R. ‘‘Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives’’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 1997 11 4 83 92

RikerW. H. GreensteinF. I.PolsbyN.W. ‘‘Federalism’’ Handbook of political science 5: Governmental institutions and processes 1975 Reading, MA Addison-Wesley

RisseT. HeywoodP.JonesE.RhodesM. “Nationalism and collective identities: Europe versus the nation-state?” Developments in west European politics 2002 2 Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire Palgrave 77 93

SmithT. W.KimS. “World opinion. national pride in comparative perspective: 1995/96 and 2003/04” International Journal of Public Research 2006 18 1 127 136

SnijdersT.BoskerR. Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling 1999 London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi Sage

TeachmanJ.CrowderK. “Multilevel models in family research: Some conceptual and methodological issues” Journal of Marriage and Family 2002 64 2 280 294

TreismanD. “What Have We Learned About the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research?” Annual Review of Political Science 2007 10 211 244

Waldron-MooreP. “Eastern Europe at the crossroads of democratic transition: Evaluating support for democratic institutions, satisfaction with democratic government, and consolidation of democratic regimes” Comparative Political Studies 1999 32 1 32 62

WestleB. Kollektive Identität im vereinten Deutschland: Nation und Demokratie in der Wahrnehmung der Deutschen 1999 Opladen Leske + Budrich

WestleB. Politische Kultur: Eine Einführung 2009 Baden-Baden Nomos

WVS World values survey 1981–2008 official aggregate v.20090901 2009 2009 World Values Survey Association (www.worldvaluessurvey.org). Aggregate File Producer: ASEP/JDS Madrid.

World Bank World Development Indicators 2010 Online: http://data.worldbank.org/ [retrieved: 14.10.2010].

18)

Keefer (2009): Database of political Institutions: Proportional Representation? (1 if yes 0 if no).

19)

Keefer (2009): Database of Political Institutions: System: Parliamentary (1) Presidential (and assembly elected presidents) (0).

20)

Nordsiek Wolfram (2010): Parties and Elections. The database about parliamentary elections and political parties in Europe; African Election Database http://africanelections.tripod.com/ [11.10.2010]; diverse national websites on government composition.

21)

Keefer (2009): Database of Political Institutions: State: Are there state/province governments locally elected? (0) if neither local executive nor local legislature are locally elected (1) if one or both are locally elected.

22)

Keefer (2009): Database of Political Institutions: Author: Do the state/provinces have authority over taxing spending or legislating? If 1 for any of these category gets a 1. Authority over ‘cultural affairs’ or ‘planning’ in Communist systems does not qualify.

23)

Johnson & Wallack (2006): Database of Electoral Systems and the Personal Vote. Bicameralism: Dummy variable 1 if bicameral system.

24)

Treisman (2006): The number of consecutive years since 1930 that the system had been democratic as of 2000 updated for the current study.

25)

World Bank (2010): World Development Indicators: GDP per Capita (current US$) in 1000.

26)

World Bank (2010): World Development Indicators. Population in 1000.

Figures

  • View in gallery
    The interactive impact of bicameralism and authority on the national pride of ethnic minorities

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 26 26 7
Full Text Views 103 103 43
PDF Downloads 3 3 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0