Party System Format and the Longevity of Party Systems: An Empirical Examination

in Comparative Sociology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This article employs the Cox proportional hazards model to discover the factors of survival of 162 party systems from 1792 to 2009. In order to avoid the endogeneity problem, the analysis employs the level of democracy as a control variable. The impact of the overall level of party system fragmentation is found negligible, even though excessive fragmentation is conducive to a higher hazard of party system termination. More importantly, systems with close competition among leading parties – including two-party systems and systems with close competition among up to four parties – are more likely to survive across time. The article introduces a methodological innovation by disaggregating the effective number of parties into two components, the leading parties’ balance and the residual fragmentation.

Party System Format and the Longevity of Party Systems: An Empirical Examination

in Comparative Sociology

Sections

References

NetoAmorimOctavioCoxGary W. “Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties” American Journal of Political Science 1997 41 149 174

BartoliniStefano “Collusion, Competition and Democracy: Part i Journal of Theoretical Politics 1999 11 435 470

BlackorbyCharlesDonaldsonDavidWeymarkJohn A. “A Normative Approach to Industrial-Performance-Evaluation and Concentration Indices” European Economic Review 1982 19 89 121

BlondelJean “Party Systems and Patterns of Government in Western Democracies” Canadian Journal of Political Science 1968 1 180 203

BogaardsMatthijs “Counting Parties and Identifying Dominant Party Systems in Africa” European Journal of Political Research 2004 43 173 197

BogaardsMatthijs “Measuring Democracy Through Election Outcomes: A Critique with African Data” Comparative Political Studies 2007 40 1211 1237

CaramaniDaniele Elections in Western Europe Since 1815: Electoral Results by Constituencies 2000 London and New York Macmillan Reference

CookChris European Political Facts of the Twentieth Century 2001 5th ed. New York Palgrave

CoxDavid R.OakesDavid Analysis of Survival Data 1984 London Chapman and Hall

DixRobert H. “Democratization and the Institutionalization of Latin American Political Parties” Comparative Political Studies 1992 24 488 511

DumontPatrickCaulierJean-François The Effective Number of Relevant Parties: How Voting Power Improves Laakso-Taagepera’s Index 2003 Brussels CEREC Center for Research in Economics cerec working paper 2003/7

DunleavyPatrickBoucekFrançoise “Constructing the Number of Parties” Party Politics 2003 9 291 315

DuvergerMaurice Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State 1954 London Methuen

GolosovGrigorii V. “The Effective Number of Parties: A New Approach” Party Politics 2010 16 171 192

GolosovGrigorii V. “Party System Classification: A Methodological Inquiry” Party Politics 2011 17 539 560

GolosovGrigorii V. “Towards a Classification of the World’s Democratic Party Systems, Step 1: Identifying the Units” Party Politics 2013 19 122 142

GrossDonald A.SigelmanLee “Comparing Party Systems: A Multidimensional Approach” Comparative Politics 1984 16 463 479

HermensFerdinand A. Democracy or Anarchy? A Study of Proportional Representation 1941 Notre Dame, IN Review of Politics

HuntingtonSamuel P. Political Order in Changing Societies 1968 New Haven, CT Yale University Press

KlineReuben “How We Count Counts: The Empirical Effects of Using Coalitional Potential to Measure the Effective Number of Parties” Electoral Studies 2009 28 261 269

KuenziMichelleLambrightGina “Party System Institutionalization in 30 African Countries” Party Politics 2001 7 437 468

LaaksoM.TaageperaR. “ ‘Effective’ Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe” Comparative Political Studies 1979 12 3 27

LijphartArend “Typologies of Democratic Systems” Comparative Political Studies 1968 1 3 44

LijphartArend Electoral Systems and Party Systems. A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies 1945–1990 1994 Oxford Oxford University Press

MackieThomas T.RoseRichard International Almanac of Electoral History 1991 2nd ed. Washington, DC Macmillan/CQ Press

MainwaringScott “Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination” Comparative Political Studies 1993 26 198 228

MainwaringScottScullyTimothy Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America 1995 Stanford, CA Stanford University Press

MainwaringScottTorcalMariano KatzR.S.CrottyW. “Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization” Handbook of political parties 2006 London Sage 204 227

MainwaringScottGervasoniCarlosEspaña-NájeraAnnabella The Vote Share of New and Young Parties 2010 Notre Dame, IN University of Notre Dame Kellog Institute working paper wps#368

MarshallMonty G.GurrTed R.DavenportChristianJaggersKeith “POLITY iv, 1800–1999: Comments on Munck and Verkuilen” Comparative Political Studies 2002 35 40 45

MoserRobert G. Unexpected Outcomes: Electoral Systems Political Parties and Representation in Russia 2001 Pittsburgh, PA University of Pittsburgh Press

NohlenDieterThibautBernardKrennerichMichael Elections in Africa: A Data Handbook 1999 Oxford Oxford University Press

NohlenDieter Elections in the Americas: A Data Handbook 2005 Oxford Oxford University Press

NohlenDieterGrotzFlorianHartmannChristof Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook 2001 vol. 1 2 Oxford Oxford University Press

OrdeshookPeter C.ShvetsovaOlga V. “Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties” American Journal of Political Science 1994 38 100 123

PemsteinDanielMeserveStephen A.MeltonJames “Democratic Compromise: A Latent Variable Analysis of Ten Measures of Regime Type” Political Analysis 2010 18 426 449

PrzeworskiAdamAlvarezMichael E.CheibubJosé Antonio Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World 1950–1990 2000 New York Cambridge University Press

ReillyBenjaminNordlundPer Political Parties in Conflict-Prone Societies: Regulation Engineering and Democratic Development 2008 New York United Nations University Press

SanchezOmar “Party Non-Systems: A Conceptual Innovation” Party Politics 2009 15 487 520

SandersDavidHermanValentine “The Stability and Survival of Governments in Western Democracies” Acta Politica 1977 12 346 377

SartoriGiovanni Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis 1976 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press

SiaroffAlan Comparative European Party Systems: An Analysis of Parliamentary Elections Since 1945 2000 New York and London Taylor and Francis

SikkAllan “How Unstable? Volatility and the Genuinely New Parties in Eastern Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 2005 44 391 412

SzajkowskiBogdan Political Parties of the World 2002 6th ed. London John Harper

TaageperaRein “Inequality, Concentration, Imbalance” Political Methodology 1979 6 275 291

TaageperaRein “Conservation of Balance in the Size of Parties” Party Politics 2005 11 283 298

12

Dunleavy and Boucek (2003) Golosov (2010). The index of Dumont and Caulier (2003) while being also based on HH to an extent departs from it by replacing the proportions of seats in the calculus for NLT with the Banzhaf voting power measures but it is not a truly continuous measure because it does not allow for making distinctions among party constellations with s1 > 0.5. See however Kline (2009).

Figures

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 11 11 3
Full Text Views 3 3 3
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0