The objective of this paper is to outline and compare frameworks for studying post-Soviet transformations developed by social scientists from various disciplines in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. The objective is realized by means of quantitative content analysis of scholarly articles’ abstracts in ninety-four journals in eight (inter)disciplinary fields that covers the period of 2001-2015. This paper seeks to answer the question whether differences in the studies of the post-Soviet transformations are defined by country discourse or by the field of study. The research results suggest that there is a two-level mechanism, by which the societal context affects academia, in this case, social sciences and humanities. While general directions of scholarly attention are determined by societal differences, representations of post-Soviet transformations are framed through specific disciplinary lenses that combine both international and post-Soviet features.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Batygin G.S. Yadov V.A. “Preyemstvennost’ Rossiyskoy Sotsiologicheskoy Traditsii [Continuity of the Russian Sociological Tradition]” Sotsiologiya v Rossii [Sociology in Russia] 1999 Moscow Publishing House of Institute of Sociology of Russian Academy of Sciences 19 39
Batygin G.S. Batygin G.S. et al. “Sotsial’nyye Uchenyye v Usloviyakh Krizisa: Strukturnyye Izmeneniya v Distsiplinarnoy Organizatsii i Tematicheskom Repertuare Sotsial’nykh Nauk [Social Scientists under the Crisis: Structural Changes in the Disciplinary Organization and Thematic Repertoire of Social Sciences]” Sotsial’nyye Nauki v Postsovetskoy Rossii [Social Sciences in the Post-Soviet Russia] 2005 Moscow Academic Project 34 43
Bekus N. Struggle over Identity. The Official and the Alternative “Belarusianness” 2010 Budapest Central European University Press
Bourdieu P. “The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason” Social Science Information 1975 6 19 47
Buck-Morss S. “Theorizing Today: The Post-Soviet Condition” (Cornell University) 2006 Retrieved October 2, 2016 (http://falcon.arts.cornell.edu/sbm5/Documents/theorizing%20today.pdf)
Burawoy M. “Neoclassical Sociology: From the End of Communism to the End of Classes” American Journal of Sociology 2001a 4 1099 1120
Burawoy M. “Transition without Transformation: Russia’s Descent into Capitalism” East European Politics and Societies 2001b 2 269 290
Burawoy M. “Third-Wave Sociology and the End of Pure Science” The American Sociologist 2005 3/4 152 165
Chew M. “Academic Boundary Work in Non-Western Academies: A Comparative Analysis of the Philosophy Discipline in Modern China and Japan” International Sociology 2005 4 530 559
Chew M. “Rethinking the relationship between intellectuals and nationalism: A sociology of knowledge approach to philosophers’ construction of national cultural identities in modern Japan and China” Current Sociology 2014 3 314 333
Clarke S. “A Very Soviet Form of Capitalism? The Management of Holding Companies in Russia” Post-Communist Economies 2004 4 405 422
Clarke S. Danspeckgruber W. “Social Partnership, Civil Society and the State in Russia” Perspectives on the Russian State in Transition 2006 Princeton Princeton University Press 66 97
Collins R. The Sociology of Philosophers. A Global Theory of Intellectual Change 1998 Harvard Harvard University Press
Collins R. “Who has been a successful public intellectual?” European Journal of Social Theory 2011 4 437 452
DiMaggio P. & Powell W. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields” American Sociological Review 1983 2 147 160
“Epokha Yel’tsina i Raspad sssr. Press-vypusk Levada-Tsentra, 01.02.2016 [Yeltsin Epoch and the Disintegration of the ussr. Press Release of the Levada Center, February 1, 2016]” (Levada Center) 2016 Retrieved October 2, 2016 (http://www.levada.ru/2016/02/01/epoha-eltsina-i-raspad-sssr/)
Eyal G. , Szélényi I. & Townsley E. “On Irony: An Invitation to Neoclassical Sociology” Theses Eleven 2003 1 5 41
Foster J.G. , Rzhetsky A. & Evans J.A. “Tradition and Innovation in Scientists’ Research Strategies” American Sociological Review 5 875 908
Graham L.R. Science in Russia and the Soviet Union: A Short History 1993 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Greenfeld L. “Soviet Sociology and Sociology in the Soviet Union” Annual Review of Sociology 1988 14 99 123
Guba K.S. “Sotsial’naya Organizatsiya Zhurnal’nykh Sistem i Ikh Rol’ v Formirovanii Kommunikativnoy Struktury Sotsiologii [The Social Organization of Journal Systems and Their Role in Shaping the Communicative Structure of Sociology].” 2015 PhD Dissertation, Department of Political Sciences and Sociology, European University in Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg
Klumbytė N. “Europe and its fragments: Europeanization, nationalism, and the geopolitics of provinciality in Lithuania” Slavic Review 2011 4 844 872
Laruelle M. “The Discipline of Culturology: A New ‘Ready-made Thought’ for Russia?” Diogenes 2004 204 21 36
Martin T. The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union 1923-1939 2001 Ithaca Cornell UP
Meyer J. & Rowan B. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony” American Journal of Sociology 1977 83 340 363
Nee V. Smelser N. & Swedberg R. “The New Institutionalism in Economics and Sociology” Handbook for Economic Sociology 2005 Princeton Princeton University Press 49 74
Penzin A. “Post-Soviet Singularity and Codes of Cultural Translation” (The Latvian Centre for Contemporary Art) 2009 Retrieved October 2, 2016 (http://old.lcca.lv/e-texts/17/)
Rating Group Ukraine “Dynamics of Nostalgia for the ussr” 2015 Retrieved October 2, 2016 (http://ratinggroup.ua/en/research/ukraine/dinamika_nostalgii_po_sssr.html)
Ries N. Russian Talk: Culture and Conversation During Perestroika 1997 Ithaca, N.Y. and London Cornell University Press
Ries N. “Potato Ontology: Surviving Postsocialism in Russia” Cultural Anthropology 2009 2 181 212
“Rossiyan Potyanulo v sssr. Press-vypusk Levada-Tsentra, 27.02.2014 [Russians are yearning for the ussr. Press Release of the Levada Center, October 27, 2014]” (Levada Center). 2014 Retrieved October 2, 2016 (http://www.levada.ru/2014/02/27/rossiyan-potyanulo-v-sssr/)
Savchenko A. Belarus – A Perpetual Borderland 2009 Brill
Sokolov M. “Rossiyskaya Sotsiologiya Posle 1991 Goda: Intellektual’naya I Institutsional’naya Dinamika «Bednoy Nauki» [Russian Sociology after 1991: Intellectual and Institutional Dynamics of “Poor Science”]” Laboratorium 2009 1 20 47
Sokolov M. “Rynki Truda, Stratifikatsiya i Kar’yery v Sovetskoy Sotsiologii: Istoriya Sovetskoy Sotsiologicheskoy Professii [Labor Markets, Stratification and Careers in Soviet Sociology: History of Soviet Sociological Profession]” Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya [Economic Sociology] 2011 4 37 72
Sokolov M. “O Protsesse Akademicheskoy (De)tsivilizatsii [On Academic (De)civilization Process]” Sotsiologicheskiye Issledovaniya [Sociological Research] 2012 8 21 30
Starikov V.S. “Sravnitel’nyy Analiz Transformatsii Sistem Vysshego Obrazovaniya v Belarusi, Rossii, Ukraine I Stranakh Baltii [Comparative Analysis of Transformation of Systems of Higher Education in Belarus, Russia, Ukraine, and Baltic States]” 2016 PhD Dissertation, Department of Sociology, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg
Stark D. “Ambiguous Assets for Uncertain Environments: Heterarchy in Postsocialist Firms” Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya [Economic Sociology] 2 7 34
Sztompka P. “Marxism, Functionalism and Systems-Approach” Polish Essays in the Methodology of the Social Sciences 1979 Netherlands Springer 133 156
Vanderstraeten R. “Scientific Communication: Sociology Journals and Publication Practices” Sociology 2010 3 559 576
Wallerstein I. “Does India Exist?” Unthinking Social Science 1991 Cambridge Polity Press 130 134
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 396 | 65 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 192 | 2 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 25 | 3 | 0 |
The objective of this paper is to outline and compare frameworks for studying post-Soviet transformations developed by social scientists from various disciplines in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. The objective is realized by means of quantitative content analysis of scholarly articles’ abstracts in ninety-four journals in eight (inter)disciplinary fields that covers the period of 2001-2015. This paper seeks to answer the question whether differences in the studies of the post-Soviet transformations are defined by country discourse or by the field of study. The research results suggest that there is a two-level mechanism, by which the societal context affects academia, in this case, social sciences and humanities. While general directions of scholarly attention are determined by societal differences, representations of post-Soviet transformations are framed through specific disciplinary lenses that combine both international and post-Soviet features.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 396 | 65 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 192 | 2 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 25 | 3 | 0 |