Focusing on Europe, this article aims to disentangle the patterns of cultural clustering and to throw more light on concepts such as ‘civilizations’ and ‘cultural zones.’ Cross-cultural analyses unanimously find that various historical background and socioeconomic indicators are strongly correlated to societal values, however, a systematic investigation on what makes societal cultures similar and different hasn’t been conducted. The author first outlines the factors and mechanisms that may explain value similarities, then the author tests their importance using dyadic data on 40 countries from the wvs. Multiple factors are associated to the cultural similarities: the historical background – i.e. countries’ political-institutional traditions, religion, language, and imperial legacies – and also socio-economic development, geographical distance, European integration, and climatic differences. The substantial overlap among them, however, diminishes the absolute importance of any of the explanatory factors. The multiple determinants of value differences speak against a classification of national cultures into cultural zones based on single formative factors.
Fatu-TutoveanuA.“Soviet cultural collonialism: Cultual and political domination in the late 1940s-early 1950s Romania”Trames-Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences20121617793doi: 10.3176/tr.2012.1.04.
FincherCorey LThornhillRandyMurrayDamian RSchallerMark“Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences2008275164012791285doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0094.
KlingemannHans-DieterWeldonSteven“A crisis of integration? The development of transnational dyadic trust in the European Union, 1954-2004”European Journal of Political Research2013524457482doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12005.
LewerJ. J.Van den BergH.“Religion and international trade – Does the sharing of a religious culture facilitate the formation of trade networks?”American Journal of Economics and Sociology2007664765794doi: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2007.00539.x.
TeorellJanDahlbergStefanHolmbergSörenRothsteinBoHartmannFelixSvenssonRichard2015The Quality of Government Standard Dataset, version Jan15. edited by University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute.
Van de VliertEvertClimate, Affluence, and Culture2008CambridgeCambridge University Press