Political Competition in Sweden 1976-2014

A Comparative Analysis at the Local Level

in Comparative Sociology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


The main purpose of this study is to examine political competition on the local level in Sweden and to empirically test two theories of political competition, namely whether the size of the unit affects the variation in political competition and whether socioeconomic standards affect the variation in political competition. The findings support the suggested causal mechanism between socioeconomic standards and competition. Accordingly, units with higher socioeconomic standards have a higher level of political competition. Some empirical findings also support the suggested causal mechanism between the size of the units and the political competition. The findings show that population size is a robust determinant of competition and that a larger population size affects competition positively. The findings show also that area size is a relatively robust determinant of competition and that area size has a negative effect on competition. However the negative effect is contrary to the expectations.

Political Competition in Sweden 1976-2014

A Comparative Analysis at the Local Level

in Comparative Sociology



AchenC. H. Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables 2000 Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association July 2000 UCLA Ann Arbor

AistrupJ. A. State legislative party competition: A county-level measure Political Research Quarterly 1993 46 2 433 446

AistrupJ. A. Constituency diversity and party competition: A county and state level analysis Political Research Quarterly 2004 57 2 267 281

AltmanD.Pérez-LiñánA. Assessing the quality of democracy: Freedom, competitiveness and participation in eighteen Latin American countries Democratization 2002 9 2 85 100

AnckarC. Storlek och partisystem: en studie av 77 stater 1998 Åbo Åbo Akademis Förlag

AnckarC. Size, islandness, and democracy: A global comparison International political science review 2008 29 4 433 459

AnckarD. Homogeneity and smallness: Dahl and Tufte revisited Scandinavian Political Studies 1999 22 1 29 44

BartoliniS. Collusion, Competition and Democracy Part i Journal of Theoretical Politics 1999 11 4 435 470

BartoliniS. Collusion, Competition and Democracy Part ii Journal of Theoretical Politics 2000 12 1 33 65

BeckN. Time-series-cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years? Annual Review of Political Science 2001 4 1 271 293

BeckN.KatzJ. N. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data American Political Science Review 1995 634 647

BeckN.KatzJ. N. Nuisance vs. substance: Specifying and estimating time-series-cross-section models Political Analysis 1996 6 1 1 36

BeckN.KatzJ. N. Modeling dynamics in time-series-cross-section political economy data Annual Review of Political Science 2011 14 331 352

BäckH. Explaining coalitions: evidence and lessons from studying coalition formation in Swedish local government 2003 Uppsala University

BäckH.HadeniusA. Democracy and State Capacity: Exploring a J‐Shaped Relationship Governance 2008 21 1 1 24

CasstevensT. W.PressC. The context of democratic competition in American state politics American Journal of Sociology 1963 536 543

DahlR. A. Polyarchy: Participation and opposition 1971 New Haven, CT Yale University Press

DahlR. A. Democracy and its Critics 1989 New Haven and London Yale University Press

DahlR. A.TufteE. R. Size and democracy 1973 Stanford University Press

DawsonR. E.RobinsonJ. A. Inter-party competition, economic variables, and welfare policies in the American states The Journal of Politics 1963 25 2 265 289

DenkT. Size and Political Support on the Local Level in Sweden Local Government Studies 2012 38 6 777 793

DiamondL. DiamondL.PlatterM. F. Three Paradoxes of Democracy The Global Resurgence of Democracy 1996 Baltimore and London Johns Hopkins University Press 111 123

DownsA. An economic theory of political action in a democracy The Journal of Political Economy 1957 135 150

DyeT. R. Politics economics and the public: policy outcomes in the American states 1966 Chicago Rand McNally & Company

FoxJ. Regression diagnostics 1991 Thousand Oaks SAGE Publications

FranklinM. N. Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945 2004 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

GerringJ.PalmerM.TeorellJ.ZareckiD. Demography and democracy: A global, district-level analysis of electoral contestation American Political Science Review 2015 109 3 574 591

HillK. Q. Democracy in the fifty states 1994 Lincoln and London University of Nebraska Press

HögströmJ. Quality of Democracy Around the Globe: A Comparative Study 2013 Östersund, Sweden Mid Sweden University Doctoral Thesis

HögströmJ. Democracies in crisis Contemporary Politics 2014 20 4 402 420

KarlssonD. A Democracy of Scale. Size and Representative Democracy in Swedish Local Government Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 2013 17 1 7 28

KeeleL.KellyN. J. Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables Political Analysis 2006 14 2 186 205

KingG.KeohaneR. O.VerbaS. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research 1994 Princeton, New Jersey Princeton University Press

KittelB. Sense and sensitivity in pooled analysis of political data European Journal of Political Research 1999 35 2 225 253

KittelB.WinnerH. How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalization‐welfare state nexus revisited European Journal of Political Research 2005 44 2 269 293

LarsenC. A. Municipal size and democracy: a critical analysis of the argument of proximity based on the case of Denmark Scandinavian Political Studies 2002 25 4 317 332

LassenD. D.SerritzlewS. Jurisdiction size and local democracy: evidence on internal political efficacy from large-scale municipal reform American Political Science Review 2011 105 2 238 258

MoraskiB. J.ReisingerW. M. Explaining electoral competition across Russia’s regions Slavic Review 2003 278 301

MorehouseS. M. State politics parties and policy 1981 New York Holt, Rinehart and Winston

NewtonK. Is small really so beautiful? Is big really so ugly? Size, effectiveness, and democracy in local government Political Studies 1982 30 2 190 206

PintoP. M.TimmonsJ. F. The Political Determinants of Economic Performance Political Competition and the Sources of Growth Comparative Political Studies 2005 38 1 26 50

PlümperT.TroegerV. E.ManowP. Panel data analysis in comparative politics: Linking method to theory European Journal of Political Research 2005 44 2 327 354

ReuvenyR.LiQ. Economic Openness, Democracy, and Income Inequality An Empirical Analysis Comparative Political Studies 2003 36 5 575 601

Statistics Sweden 2016 Last accessed June 30 2016 From www.scb.se

StrømK. Inter-party competition in advanced democracies Journal of Theoretical Politics 1989 1 3 277 300

StrømK. Democracy as political competition American Behavioral Scientist 1992 35 4-5 375 396

TeuneH.PrzeworskiA. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry 1970 Malabar, Florida Krieger Publishing Company

TrippA. M.KangA. The global impact of quotas on the fast track to increased female legislative representation Comparative Political Studies 2008 41 3 338 361

VanhanenT. Prospects of democracy: A study of 172 countries 1997 London and New York Routledge

VanhanenT. A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810-1998 Journal of Peace Research 2000 37 2 251 265

VanhanenT. Democratization: A comparative analysis of 170 countries 2003 London and New York Routledge

WrightJ. Political competition and democratic stability in new democracies British journal of political science 2008 38 2 221 245


See also Downs (1957).


In model 1 the five cases Kiruna (1994) Kiruna (2002) Stockholm (2006) Gällivarie (1998) and Gällivarie (2002) have a Cook’s value of over .010. In model 2 the four cases Stockholm (2006) Stockholm (2010) Vellinge (2006) and Kiruna (2002) have a Cook’s value of over .010. In model 3 the seven cases Kiruna (1994) Stockholm (2006) Gällivarie (1998) Jokkmokk (1998) Gällivarie (2006) Arjeplog (2014) and Vaxholm (2006) have a Cook’s value of over .010.


  • View in gallery
    Central trend and dispersion in political competition 1976-2014.
  • View in gallery
    Scatterplot – political competition 1976 and 2014.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 20 20 10
Full Text Views 12 12 8
PDF Downloads 6 6 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0