Reflection on Political Representation

Constituency Service as Topic in Irish and British Parliamentary Debates

in Comparative Sociology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

This article compares how Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom and Ireland reflect on constituency service as an aspect of political representation. It differs from existing research on the constituency role of mps in two regards. First, it approaches the question from a sociological viewpoint that emphasizes the process character of role-taking and its need for validation by others. Second, instead of relying on interviews and surveys it analyses how mps refer to aspects of constituency work in parliamentary debate. This choice of empirical material opens up a long-term view on reflections of constituency service that either validate or question understandings of the constituency role. Although mps in both countries are heavily engaged in constituency work, the analysis reveals important differences in this regard, with Irish mps recurrently criticizing their own role in the constituency, while British mps unequivocally see it in a positive light.

Reflection on Political Representation

Constituency Service as Topic in Irish and British Parliamentary Debates

in Comparative Sociology

Sections

References

AndewegR.B. 1997. “Role Specialisation or Role Switching. Dutch mps between Electorate and Executive.” Journal of Legislative Studies 3: 110-127.

AndréA.GallagherM. and SandriG. 2014. “Electoral Rules and Legislators’ Personal Vote-Seeking.” Pp. 166-187 in Representing the People. A Survey Among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments edited by K. Deschouwer and S. Depauw. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

BlomgrenM. and RozenbergO. 2012. “Legislative Roles and Legislative Studies. The Neo-Institutionalist Turning Point?” Pp. 8-36 in Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures edited by M. Blomgren and O. Rozenberg. London: Routledge.

CainB.FerejohnJ.A. and FiorinaM.P. 1987. The Personal Vote. Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge (Ma.): Harvard University Press.

CartyR. 1981. “Brokerage and Partisanship. Politicians, Parties and Elections in Ireland.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 14: 53-81.

ChubbB. 1963. “Going About Persecuting Civil Servants: The Role of the Irish Parliamentary Representative.” Political Studies 11: 272-286.

DeschouwerK. and DepauwS.(eds.) 2014. Representing the People. A Survey Among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DoganM. 2007. “Parliamentarians as Errand Boys in France, Britain and the United States.” Comparative Sociology 6: 430-463.

DowseR.E. 1963. “The M.P. and His Surgery.” Political Studies 11: 333-341.

EsaiassonP. 2000. “How Members of Parliament Define Their Task.” Pp. 51-82 in Beyond Westminster and Congress. The Nordic Experience edited by P. Esaiasson and K. Heidar. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

EulauH.WahlkeJ.C.BuchananW. and Ferguson L.C. 1959. “The Role of the Representative. Some Empirical Observations on the Theory of Edmund Burke.” American Political Science Review 53: 742-756.

FarrellD.M. 2001. Electoral Systems. A Comparative Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

FennoR.F. 1978. Home Style. House Members in Their Districts. Glenview: Scott Foresman.

GallagherM. 1987. “Does Ireland need a new electoral system?” Irish Political Studies 2: 27-48.

GallagherM. and KomitoL. 2010. “The Constituency Role of Dáil Deputies.” Pp. 230-262 Politics in the Republic of Ireland5th ed. edited by J. Coakley and M. Gallagher. London: Routledge.

GayO. 2005. “MPs Go Back to Their Constituencies.” Political Quarterly 76: 57-66.

GibbonP. and Higgins M.D. 1974. “Patronage, Tradition and Modernisation: The Case of the Irish ‘Gombeenman’.” Economic and Social Review 6: 27-44.

GiddensA. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

HeitshusenV.Young G. and WoodD.M. 2005. “Electoral Context and mp Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and the United Kingdom.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 32-45.

HigginsM.D. 1982. “The Limits of Clientelism. Towards an Assessment of Irish Politics.” Pp. 114-141 in Private Patronage and Public Power edited by C. Clapham. London: Frances Pinter.

KomitoL. 1984. “Irish Clientelism. A Reappraisal.” Economic and Social Review 15: 173-194.

KuscheI. 2016. Politischer Klientelismus. Informelle Macht in Griechenland und Irland. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

LintonR. 1936. The Study of Man. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

LuhmannN. 1983. Legitimation durch Verfahren. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

MarshM. 2008. “Explanations for Party Choice.” Pp. 105-131 in How Ireland Voted 2007. The Full Story of Ireland’s General Election edited by M. Gallagher and M. Marsh. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

MayringP. 1983. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz.

NorrisP. 1997. “The Puzzle of Constituency Service.” Journal of Legislative Studies 3: 29-49.

NortonP. 1994. “The Growth of the Constituency Role of the mp.” Parliamentary Affairs 47: 705-720.

NortonP. and WoodD.M. 1993. Back from Westminster. British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

O’LearyE. 2011. “The Constituency Orientation of Modern tds.” Irish Political Studies 26: 329-343.

ParsonsT. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.

SearingD.D. 1994. Westminster’s World. Understanding Political Roles. Cambridge (Ma.): Harvard University Press.

ToddM. 2010. Members of Parliament. House of Commons DebatesApril 71147-1149.

TurnerR.H. 1975. “Role-taking. Process versus Conformity.” Pp. 109-122 in Life as Theater. A Dramaturgical Sourcebook edited by D. Brissett and C. Edgley. Chicago: Aldine.

UptonP. 1996. European Parliament Elections Bill, 1996: Second StageDáil DebatesNovember 7507-511.

WahlkeJ.C.Eulau H.BuchananW. and FergussonL.C. 1962. The Legislative System. Explorations in Legislative Behaviour. New York: Wiley.

WoodD.M. and YoungG. 1997. “Comparing Constituency Activity by Junior Legislators in Great Britain and Ireland.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22: 217-232.

Figures

  • View in gallery
    Contributions in the House of Commons using the terms ‘casework’ and ‘constituency service’ – Variation in time.
  • View in gallery
    Contributions in House of Commons and Dáil using the terms ‘parish-pump politics’, ‘pork-barrel politics’, clientelism and gombeen politics – Variation in time.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 96 96 74
Full Text Views 96 96 65
PDF Downloads 4 4 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0