Reflection on Political Representation

Constituency Service as Topic in Irish and British Parliamentary Debates

In: Comparative Sociology
View More View Less
  • 1 Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, Aarhus University, Denmark

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$30.00

Abstract

This article compares how Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom and Ireland reflect on constituency service as an aspect of political representation. It differs from existing research on the constituency role of mps in two regards. First, it approaches the question from a sociological viewpoint that emphasizes the process character of role-taking and its need for validation by others. Second, instead of relying on interviews and surveys it analyses how mps refer to aspects of constituency work in parliamentary debate. This choice of empirical material opens up a long-term view on reflections of constituency service that either validate or question understandings of the constituency role. Although mps in both countries are heavily engaged in constituency work, the analysis reveals important differences in this regard, with Irish mps recurrently criticizing their own role in the constituency, while British mps unequivocally see it in a positive light.

  • Andeweg, R.B. 1997. “Role Specialisation or Role Switching. Dutch mps between Electorate and Executive.” Journal of Legislative Studies 3: 110-127.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • André, A., Gallagher, M. and Sandri, G. 2014. “Electoral Rules and Legislators’ Personal Vote-Seeking.” Pp. 166-187 in Representing the People. A Survey Among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments, edited by K. Deschouwer and S. Depauw. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blomgren, M. and Rozenberg, O. 2012. “Legislative Roles and Legislative Studies. The Neo-Institutionalist Turning Point?” Pp. 8-36 in Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures, edited by M. Blomgren and O. Rozenberg. London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cain, B., Ferejohn, J.A. and Fiorina, M.P. 1987. The Personal Vote. Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge (Ma.): Harvard University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carty, R. 1981. “Brokerage and Partisanship. Politicians, Parties and Elections in Ireland.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 14: 53-81.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chubb, B. 1963. “Going About Persecuting Civil Servants: The Role of the Irish Parliamentary Representative.” Political Studies 11: 272-286.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deschouwer, K. and Depauw, S.(eds.) 2014. Representing the People. A Survey Among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dogan, M. 2007. “Parliamentarians as Errand Boys in France, Britain and the United States.” Comparative Sociology 6: 430-463.

  • Dowse, R.E. 1963. “The M.P. and His Surgery.” Political Studies 11: 333-341.

  • Esaiasson, P. 2000. “How Members of Parliament Define Their Task.” Pp. 51-82 in Beyond Westminster and Congress. The Nordic Experience, edited by P. Esaiasson and K. Heidar. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eulau, H., Wahlke, J.C., Buchanan, W. and Ferguson L.C. 1959. “The Role of the Representative. Some Empirical Observations on the Theory of Edmund Burke.” American Political Science Review 53: 742-756.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Farrell, D.M. 2001. Electoral Systems. A Comparative Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

  • Fenno, R.F. 1978. Home Style. House Members in Their Districts. Glenview: Scott Foresman.

  • Gallagher, M. 1987. “Does Ireland need a new electoral system?” Irish Political Studies 2: 27-48.

  • Gallagher, M. and Komito, L. 2010. “The Constituency Role of Dáil Deputies.” Pp. 230-262 Politics in the Republic of Ireland, 5th ed., edited by J. Coakley and M. Gallagher. London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gay, O. 2005. “MPs Go Back to Their Constituencies.” Political Quarterly 76: 57-66.

  • Gibbon, P., and Higgins M.D. 1974. “Patronage, Tradition and Modernisation: The Case of the Irish ‘Gombeenman’.” Economic and Social Review 6: 27-44.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Heitshusen, V., Young G., and Wood, D.M. 2005. “Electoral Context and mp Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and the United Kingdom.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 32-45.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Higgins, M.D. 1982. “The Limits of Clientelism. Towards an Assessment of Irish Politics.” Pp. 114-141 in Private Patronage and Public Power, edited by C. Clapham. London: Frances Pinter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Komito, L. 1984. “Irish Clientelism. A Reappraisal.” Economic and Social Review 15: 173-194.

  • Kusche, I. 2016. Politischer Klientelismus. Informelle Macht in Griechenland und Irland. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

  • Linton, R. 1936. The Study of Man. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

  • Luhmann, N. 1983. Legitimation durch Verfahren. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

  • Marsh, M. 2008. “Explanations for Party Choice.” Pp. 105-131 in How Ireland Voted 2007. The Full Story of Ireland’s General Election, edited by M. Gallagher and M. Marsh. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mayring, P. 1983. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz.

  • Norris, P. 1997. “The Puzzle of Constituency Service.” Journal of Legislative Studies 3: 29-49.

  • Norton, P. 1994. “The Growth of the Constituency Role of the mp.” Parliamentary Affairs 47: 705-720.

  • Norton, P. and Wood, D.M. 1993. Back from Westminster. British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O’Leary, E. 2011. “The Constituency Orientation of Modern tds.” Irish Political Studies 26: 329-343.

  • Parsons, T. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.

  • Searing, D.D. 1994. Westminster’s World. Understanding Political Roles. Cambridge (Ma.): Harvard University Press.

  • Todd, M. 2010. Members of Parliament. House of Commons Debates, April 7, 1147-1149.

  • Turner, R.H. 1975. “Role-taking. Process versus Conformity.” Pp. 109-122 in Life as Theater. A Dramaturgical Sourcebook, edited by D. Brissett and C. Edgley. Chicago: Aldine.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Upton, P. 1996. European Parliament Elections Bill, 1996: Second Stage, Dáil Debates, November 7, 507-511.

  • Wahlke, J.C., Eulau H., Buchanan, W., and Fergusson, L.C. 1962. The Legislative System. Explorations in Legislative Behaviour. New York: Wiley.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wood, D.M. and Young, G. 1997. “Comparing Constituency Activity by Junior Legislators in Great Britain and Ireland.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22: 217-232.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 320 105 6
Full Text Views 213 6 0
PDF Downloads 17 6 0