This article compares how Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom and Ireland reflect on constituency service as an aspect of political representation. It differs from existing research on the constituency role of mps in two regards. First, it approaches the question from a sociological viewpoint that emphasizes the process character of role-taking and its need for validation by others. Second, instead of relying on interviews and surveys it analyses how mps refer to aspects of constituency work in parliamentary debate. This choice of empirical material opens up a long-term view on reflections of constituency service that either validate or question understandings of the constituency role. Although mps in both countries are heavily engaged in constituency work, the analysis reveals important differences in this regard, with Irish mps recurrently criticizing their own role in the constituency, while British mps unequivocally see it in a positive light.
AndréA.GallagherM. and SandriG.2014. “Electoral Rules and Legislators’ Personal Vote-Seeking.” Pp. 166-187 in Representing the People. A Survey Among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments edited by K.Deschouwer and S.Depauw. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BlomgrenM. and RozenbergO.2012. “Legislative Roles and Legislative Studies. The Neo-Institutionalist Turning Point?” Pp. 8-36 in Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures edited by M.Blomgren and O.Rozenberg. London: Routledge.
EsaiassonP.2000. “How Members of Parliament Define Their Task.” Pp. 51-82 in Beyond Westminster and Congress. The Nordic Experience edited by P.Esaiasson and K.Heidar. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.