Social Topography for Sustainable Innovation Policy: Putting Institutions, Social Networks and Cognitive Frames in Their Place

in Comparative Sociology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Building upon social fields theory, the authors analyze the impact of the three social forces – institutions, social networks and cognitive frames – on the social topography of regional innovation systems. Unlike previous studies, which focused on individual social force, the authors’ fuzzy-set comparative analysis of fifteen diverse regions from four continents reveals nuanced impact of individual forces and shows that a well-functioning regional innovation system is the outcome of their combined influence. This implies a need for a coherent, reflexive, context-specific and multi-level innovation policy that supports the balanced development of an institutional framework, encourages the formation of social networks and enables supportive cognitive frames.

Social Topography for Sustainable Innovation Policy: Putting Institutions, Social Networks and Cognitive Frames in Their Place

in Comparative Sociology

Sections

References

AdamF. 2013. Measuring National Innovation Performance: The Innovation Union Scoreboard Revisited. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht & London: Springer.

Adam F.M. MakarovičB. Rončević and M. Tomššič. 2005. The Challenges of Sustained Development: the Role of Socio-cultural Factors in East-central Europe. Budapest/New York: CEU Press.

AsheimB. T. 2009. “Regional Endowment.” Pp. 261-294 in Entrepreneurship and the Innovation System of the Agder Region edited by J. Potter and G. Miranda. Paris: OECD.

AsheimB. T.H. Lawton Smith and C. Oughtton. 2011. “Regional Innovation Systems: Theory, Empirics and Policy.” Regional Studies 45 (7): 875-891.

BandeljN. 2008. From Communists to Foreign Capitalists: The Social Foundations of Foreign Direct Investment in Postsocialist Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

BeckertJ. 2010. “How do Fields Change? The Interrelations of Institutions, Networks, and Cognition in the Dynamics of Markets.” Organization Studies 31(5): 605-627.

Bellini N.M. Danson and H. Halkier (eds). 2012. Regional development agencies: the next generation?: networking knowledge and regional policies. London & New York: Routledge.

BouldingK. 1978. Ecodynamics: A New Theory of Societal Evolution. Beverly Hills & London: Sage.

CepoiV. and T. Gollob. 2017. “Innovation performance in the EU comparative perspective : the interplay of social forces in the context of national innovation systems.” Comparative Sociology 16(4): 555-579.

CookeP. 1992. “Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe.” Geoforum 23(3): 365-382.

CookeP. 2004. “Introduction: Regional innovation systems – an evolutionary approach.” Pp. 1-18 in Regional Innovation Systems: the role of governance in a globalized world: 2nd Edition edited by In P. CookeM. Heindreich and H. J. Braczyk. London: Routledge.

EdquistC. and B. Johnsson. 2006. “Institutions and Organizations in Systems of Innovation.” Pp. 41-63 in Systems of Innovation: Technologies Institutions and Organizations edited by C. Edquist. London & New York: Routledge.

EtzioniA. 1968. The Active Society. A Theory of Societal and Political Process. New York: The Free Press.

FeldmanM. P. and N. Massaard. 2002. “Location, Location, Location: Institutions and Systems in the Geography of Innovation.” Pp. 1-20 in Institutions and Systems in the Geography of Innovation edited by M. P. Feldman and N. Massard. Kluwer Academic PublishersMassachusetts.

FeldmanM. P.I. FellerJ. E. L. Bercovitz and R. M. Burtton. 2002. “University Technology Transfer and the System of Innovation.” Pp. 55-78 in Institutions and Systems in the Geography of Innovation edited by M. P. Feldman and N. Massard. Kluwer Academic PublishersMassachusetts.

FissP. C. 2011. “Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research.” Academy of Management Journal 54(2): 393-420.

Flanagan K.E. Uyarraa and M. Laranjjab. 2011. “Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation.” Research Policy 40: 702-713.

FligsteinN. and L. Dautter. 2007. “The Sociology of Markets.” Annual Review of Sociology 33: 105-128.

FourcadeM. 2007. “Theories of Markets and Theories of Society.” American Behavioral Scientist 50: 1015-1034.

FritschM. and V. Slavtschhev. 2007. “Universities and innovation in space.” Industry & Innovation 14(2): 2010-2018.

GenovN. 1997. “Four Global Trends: Rise and Limitations.” International Sociology 12(4): 409-428.

GoldsteinH. A. and K. Glasser. 2012. “Research universities as actors in the governance of local and regional development.” Journal of Technology Transfer 37: 158-174.

GuadixJ.J. Carrillo-Castrillo. L. Onieva and J. Navascuues. 2016. “Success variables in science and technology parks.” Journal of Business Research69(11): 4870-4875.

HallP. A. and D. Soskice (eds.). 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

HannerzU. 1969. Soulside: Inquiries into Ghetto Culture and Community. New York: Columbia University Press.

HargadonA. B. and Y. Dougllas. 2001. “When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light.” Administrative Science Quarterly 46(3): 476-501.

HarrisonJ. 2013. “Configuring the New ‘Regional World’: On being Caught between Territory and Networks.” Regional Studies 47(1): 55-74.

HowlettM. and J. Raynner. 2007. “Design Principles for Policy Mixes: Cohesion and Coherence in New Governance Arrangements.” Policy and Society 26(4): 1-18.

HeidenreichM. 2004. “The Dilemmas of Regional Innovation Systems.” Pp. 363-389 in Regional innovation systems: The Role of Governance in the Globalized World. 2nd edition edited by M. CookeM. Heindreich and H. J. Braczyk. London: Routledge.

IsaakR.A. Isaak and J. Zybuura. 2016. “Replicating Silicon Valley: talent and techno-management in a culture of serendipity.” Pp. 149-187 in Entrepreneurship and Talent management from a Global Perspective: Global Returnees edited by H. Wang and L. Yipeng. Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

JessopB. 2002. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.

JessopB. 2009. “From Governance to Governance Failure and from Multi-level Governance to Multi-Scalar Meta-Governance.” Pp. 79-98 in The Disoriented State: Shifts in Governmentality Territoriality and Governance edited by B. ArtsA. Langedijk and H. J. van Houtum. Springer.

KaplanS. and M. Tripssas. 2008. “Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change.” Research Policy 37(5): 790-805.

KenneyM. 2000. Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

KempR. and S. Zunddel. 2007. “Environmental Innovation Policy. Is Steering Innovation Processes Possible?” Pp. 25-46 in Innovations Towards Sustainability: Conditions and Consequences edited by M. Lehmann-Waffenschmidt. Heidelberg & New York: Physica-Verlag (Springer Science+Business Media).

KhedhaouriaA. and R. Thurrik. 2017. “Configurational conditions of national innovation capability: A fuzzy set analysis approach.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 120: 48-58.

KoschatzkyK. and H. Krooll. 2007. “Which Side of the Coin? The Regional Governance of Science and Innovation.” Regional Studies 41(8): 1115-1127.

LagendijkA. 2011. “Regional innovation policy between theory and practice.” Pp. 597-608 in Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth edited by P. CookeB. AsheimR. BoschmaR. MartinD. Schwartz and F. Tödtling. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edgar Allen Publishing.

LorentzenJ. 2009. “Learning and Innovation: What’s Different in the (Sub)Tropics and How Do We Explain it? A Review Essay.” Science Technology & Society 14(1): 177-205.

LorenzenM. 2001. “Localized Learning and Policy: Academic Advice on Enhancing Regional Competitiveness through Learning.” European Planning Studies 9(2): 163-185.

LundvallB. A. 1992. “Introduction.” Pp. 1-20 in National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning edited by B. A. Lundvall. London: Pinter.

MaesF. and P. Burseens. 2015. “Steering or Networking: The Impact of Europe 2020 on Regional Governance Structures.” Politics and Governance 3(2): 100-116.

MarsanA. G. and K. Maguiire. 2011. Categorisation of OECD Regions Using Innovation-Related Variables. oecd Regional Development Working Papers2011/03OECD PublishingParis.

MeuerJ.C. Ruppieta and U. Backes-Gellnner. 2015. “Layers of co-existing innovation systems.” Research Policy 44: 888-910.

MorlacchiP. and B. R. Marttin. 2009. “Emerging challenges for science, technology and innovation policy research: A reflexive overview: Editorial.” Research Policy 38: 571-582.

NeeV. 1998. “Sources of New Institutionalism.” Pp. 1-16 in The New Institutionalism in Sociology edited by M. C. Brinton and V. Nee. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

NelsonR. and N. Rosenbeerg. 1993. “Technical Innovation and National Systems.” Pp. 3-22 in National innovation systems: a comparative analysis edited by R. Nelson. New York & Oxford: Oxford University.

NillJ. and R. Keemp. 2009. “Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm?” Research Policy 38: 668-680.

NorthD. 1990. Institutions Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ParsonsT. 1966. Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.

PowellW. W.K. Packalen and K. Whittingtton. 2012. “Organizational and Institutional Genesis: The Emergence of High-Tech Clusters in the Life Sciences.” Pp. 434-465 in The emergence of organizations and markets edited by J. F. Padget and W. Powel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

RaginC. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

RaginC. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

RaginC. and P. Pennings (eds). 2005. Special issue on fuzzy sets and social research. Sociological Methods & Research 33(4): 423-573.

Rodriguez-PoseA. and R. Crescennzi. 2008. Mountains in a Flat World: Why Proximity Still Matters for the Location of Economic Activity.” Working Paper Series in Economic and Social Sciences 2008/09. url http://repec.imdea.org/ (accessed 15 August 2010).

RončevićB. and D. Moddic. 2012. “Social fields of technological innovations.” Pp. 226-247 in Global trends and regional development edited by N. Genov. New York: Routledge.

SandelowskiM.J. Barroso and C. I. Voiils. 2007. “Using Qualitative Metasummary to Synthesize Qualitative and Quantitative Descriptive Findings.” Res Nurse Health 30(1): 99-111.

SaxenianA. L. 1996. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.

SaxenianA. L. 2007. The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.

SchneiderM.C. Schulze-Bentrop and M. Paunesscu. 2010. “Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance.” Journal of International Business Studies 41(2): 246-266.

SmithsonM. and J. Verkuillen. 2006. Fuzzy Set Theory: Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, London & New Delhi: Sage.

StorperM. 1997. The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy. New York & London: Guilford Press.

SwidlerA. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51: 273-286.

Ter WalA. and R. Boschma 2011. “Co-evolution of Firms, Industries and Networks in Space.” Regional Studies 45(7): 919-933.

TödtlingF. and M. Trippl 2005. “One Size Fits All? Towards a Differentiated Regional Innovation Policy Approach.” Research Policy 34: 1203-1219.

TripplM.B. Asheim and J. Miörnner. 2016. “Identification of Regions with Less-Developed Research and Innovation Systems.” Pp. 23-44 in Innovation Drivers and Regional Innovation Strategies edited by M. D. ParrilliR. D. Fitjar and A. Rodriguez-Pose. New York & London: Routledge.

UzziB. and R. Lancastter. 2004. “Embeddedness and Price Formation in the Corporate Law Market.” American Sociological Review 69: 319-344.

ValaeiN.S. Rezaeib and W. K. Wan Ismaail. 2017. “Examining learning strategies, creativity, and innovation at smes using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis and pls path modelling.” Journal of Business Research 70: 224-233.

van RossemR. 1996. “The World System Paradigm as General Theory of Development: A Cross-National Test.” American Sociological Review 61: 508-527.

Vasquez-UrriagoA. R.A. Barge-Gil and R. A. Modreego. 2016. “Science and Technology Parks and Cooperation for Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Spain.” Research Policy 45: 137-147.

VenesaarU. and KuettimM. 2016. “Entrepreneurial perceptions and entrepreneurial activity in core and peripheral regions in Estonia” Pp. 145-169 Entrepreneurship Innovation and Regional Development edited by: SmallboneD.VirtanenM.Sauka A. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

WelterF.S. KolbB. O’GormanK. E. BuggeI. HollF. Peck and B. Rončevvić. 2008. “How to Make Regions (more) Innovative.” Pp. 1-11 Innovation Competitiveness Growth and Tradition in SMEs edited by U. Fueglistaller. St. Gallen: KMU-Verlag HSG.

WhittingtonK. B.J. Owen-Smith and W. W. Poweell. 2009. “Networks, Propinquity, and Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Industries.” Administrative Science Quarterly 54(1): 90-122.

WuH-J.J-K. Chen and I-S. Chhen. 2010. “Innovation capital indicator assessment of Taiwanese Universities: A hybrid fuzzy model application.” Expert Systems with Applications 37(2): 1635-1642.

Figures

  • View in gallery
    Scatter plots indicating necessity/sufficiency of the social forces in innovation performance.
  • View in gallery
    Scatter plots for mutual influence of all three social forces.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 23 23 9
Full Text Views 7 7 6
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 1 1 0