Building upon social fields theory, the authors analyze the impact of the three social forces – institutions, social networks and cognitive frames – on the social topography of regional innovation systems. Unlike previous studies, which focused on individual social force, the authors’ fuzzy-set comparative analysis of fifteen diverse regions from four continents reveals nuanced impact of individual forces and shows that a well-functioning regional innovation system is the outcome of their combined influence. This implies a need for a coherent, reflexive, context-specific and multi-level innovation policy that supports the balanced development of an institutional framework, encourages the formation of social networks and enables supportive cognitive frames.
CepoiV. and T.Gollob. 2017. “Innovation performance in the EU comparative perspective : the interplay of social forces in the context of national innovation systems.”Comparative Sociology16(4): 555-579.
CookeP.2004. “Introduction: Regional innovation systems – an evolutionary approach.” Pp. 1-18 in Regional Innovation Systems: the role of governance in a globalized world: 2nd Edition edited by In P.CookeM.Heindreich and H. J.Braczyk. London: Routledge.
EdquistC. and B.Johnsson. 2006. “Institutions and Organizations in Systems of Innovation.” Pp. 41-63 in Systems of Innovation: Technologies Institutions and Organizations edited by C.Edquist. London & New York: Routledge.
FeldmanM. P. and N.Massaard. 2002. “Location, Location, Location: Institutions and Systems in the Geography of Innovation.” Pp. 1-20 in Institutions and Systems in the Geography of Innovation edited by M. P.Feldman and N.Massard. Kluwer Academic PublishersMassachusetts.
FeldmanM. P.I.FellerJ. E. L.Bercovitz and R. M.Burtton. 2002. “University Technology Transfer and the System of Innovation.” Pp. 55-78 in Institutions and Systems in the Geography of Innovation edited by M. P.Feldman and N.Massard. Kluwer Academic PublishersMassachusetts.
HeidenreichM.2004. “The Dilemmas of Regional Innovation Systems.” Pp. 363-389 in Regional innovation systems: The Role of Governance in the Globalized World. 2nd edition edited by M.CookeM.Heindreich and H. J.Braczyk. London: Routledge.
IsaakR.A.Isaak and J.Zybuura. 2016. “Replicating Silicon Valley: talent and techno-management in a culture of serendipity.” Pp. 149-187 in Entrepreneurship and Talent management from a Global Perspective: Global Returnees edited by H.Wang and L.Yipeng. Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
JessopB.2009. “From Governance to Governance Failure and from Multi-level Governance to Multi-Scalar Meta-Governance.” Pp. 79-98 in The Disoriented State: Shifts in Governmentality Territoriality and Governance edited by B.ArtsA.Langedijk and H. J.van Houtum. Springer.
KempR. and S.Zunddel. 2007. “Environmental Innovation Policy. Is Steering Innovation Processes Possible?” Pp. 25-46 in Innovations Towards Sustainability: Conditions and Consequences edited by M.Lehmann-Waffenschmidt. Heidelberg & New York: Physica-Verlag (Springer Science+Business Media).
LagendijkA.2011. “Regional innovation policy between theory and practice.” Pp. 597-608 in Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth edited by P.CookeB.AsheimR.BoschmaR.MartinD.Schwartz and F.Tödtling. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edgar Allen Publishing.
PowellW. W.K.Packalen and K.Whittingtton. 2012. “Organizational and Institutional Genesis: The Emergence of High-Tech Clusters in the Life Sciences.” Pp. 434-465 in The emergence of organizations and markets edited by J. F.Padget and W.Powel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rodriguez-PoseA. and R.Crescennzi. 2008. “Mountains in a Flat World: Why Proximity Still Matters for the Location of Economic Activity.”Working Paper Series in Economic and Social Sciences 2008/09. urlhttp://repec.imdea.org/ (accessed 15 August 2010).
SchneiderM.C.Schulze-Bentrop and M.Paunesscu. 2010. “Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance.”Journal of International Business Studies41(2): 246-266.
TripplM.B.Asheim and J.Miörnner. 2016. “Identification of Regions with Less-Developed Research and Innovation Systems.” Pp. 23-44 in Innovation Drivers and Regional Innovation Strategies edited by M. D.ParrilliR. D.Fitjar and A.Rodriguez-Pose. New York & London: Routledge.
ValaeiN.S.Rezaeib and W. K.Wan Ismaail. 2017. “Examining learning strategies, creativity, and innovation at smes using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis and pls path modelling.”Journal of Business Research70: 224-233.
VenesaarU. and KuettimM.2016. “Entrepreneurial perceptions and entrepreneurial activity in core and peripheral regions in Estonia” Pp. 145-169Entrepreneurship Innovation and Regional Development edited by: SmallboneD.VirtanenM.SaukaA.Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
WelterF.S.KolbB.O’GormanK. E.BuggeI.HollF.Peck and B.Rončevvić. 2008. “How to Make Regions (more) Innovative.” Pp. 1-11Innovation Competitiveness Growth and Tradition in SMEs edited by U.Fueglistaller. St. Gallen: KMU-Verlag HSG.