This paper applies a comparative approach to analyze several dimensions of ‘Global Sociology’ from a normative stance based on a critical review of related discourses in sociological communities. The author reveals three major problems in intra-disciplinary, inter-disciplinary and extra-academic dimensions, manifested not only in ‘factual’ (objective) characteristics but also in ‘ideological’ visions typical of academic communities and connected with a negative stance towards global neoliberalism and its various agents: first, rigid vertical stratification of the international academic field, primarily, in terms of academic publishing and working conditions; second, negative tendencies in the status positions of sociology compared to other sciences, especially economics; and third, little cooperation with policy-makers and corporate practitioners combined with an orientation to supporting various discriminated groups against dominating powers associated with neoliberalism.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2017. “Historical Trends in Federal R&D”(American Association for the Advancement of Science). Retrieved August 16 2017 (https://www.aaas.org/page/historical-trends-federal-rd).
American Sociological Association. 2017. “Sociological Practice and Public Sociology”(American Sociological Association). Retrieved August 16 2017 (http://www.asanet.org/asa-communities/sections/sociological-practice-and-public-sociology).
BeigelF.2014. “Publishing from the periphery: Structural heterogeneity and segmented circuits. The evaluation of scientific publications for tenure in Argentina’s conicet.”Current Sociology62(5): 743-765.
British Sociological Association. 2017. “Activism in Sociology Forum”(British Sociological Association). Retrieved August 16 2017 (https://www.britsoc.co.uk/groups/special-interest-groups/activism-in-sociology-forum/).
CañónC.FriebelG. and SeabrightP.2013. “Market Design and Market Failure.” Pp. 473-512 in The handbook of rational choice social research edited by R.WittekT. A. B.Snijders and V.Nee. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
DenzauA. D. and NorthD. C.2000. “Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions.” Pp. 23-46 in Elements of Reason: Cognition Choice and the Bounds of Rationality edited by A.LupiaM. C.McCubbins and S. L.Popkin. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hassan-MonteroY.Guerrero-BoteV. P. and De-Moya-AnegónF.2014. “Graphical interface of the Scimago Journal and Country Rank: an interactive approach to accessing bibliometric information.”El profesional de la información23(3): 272-278.
International Sociological Association. 2017b. “Research Committee on Poverty, Social Welfare and Social Policy”(International Sociological Association). Retrieved August 16 2017 (http://www.rc19.org/).
KiserE. and PowersE.2013. “Rational Choice Approaching to State-Making.” Pp. 443-472 in The handbook of rational choice social research edited by R.WittekT. A. B.Snijders and V.Nee. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
LiuL. and LiuZ.2016. “The variation of universally acknowledged world-class universities (uawcus) between 2010 and 2015: An empirical study by the ranks of thes, qs and arwu.”Higher Education Studies6(4): 54-69.
MarginsonS.2016c. “The global construction of higher education reform.” Pp. 291-311 in The Handbook of Global Education Policy edited by K.MundyA.GreenB.LingardA.VergerChichester, UK; Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
MarimonR.GuardiancichI.MariathasanM.RossiE.2011. “Survey on research funding for the social sciences in Europe”(European University Institute). Retrieved December 4 2017 (http://www.eui.eu/Documents/MWP/Publications/20111012MWP-ACOSurveyResearchFunding-Full.pdf).
Mosbah-NatansonS. and GingrasY.2014. “The globalization of social sciences? Evidence from a quantitative analysis of 30 years of production, collaboration and citations in the social sciences (1980-2009).”Current Sociology62(5): 626-646.
National Science Foundationusa. 2017a. “Federal obligations for research by detailed field of science and engineering” (National Science Foundation). Retrieved August 16 2017 (https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/fedfunds/2015/html/FFS2015_DST_134.html).
National Science Foundationusa. 2017b. “Federal obligations for basic research by detailed field of science and engineering” (National Science Foundation). Retrieved August 16 2017 (https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/fedfunds/2015/html/FFS2015_DST_033.html).
NeeV. and AlbaR.2013. “Assimilation as Rational Action in Contexts Deﬁned by Institutions and Boundaries.” Pp. 355-380 in The handbook of rational choice social research edited by R.WittekT. A. B.Snijders and V.Nee. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
RamirezF. O.MeyerJ. W. and LerchJ.2016. “World society and the globalization of educational policy.” Pp. 43-63 in Handbook on global policy and policy making in education edited by K.MundyA.GreenB.LingardA.Verger. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Van HornR. and KlaesM.2011. “Chicago neoliberalism versus Cowles planning: Perspectives on patents and public goods in Cold War Economic Thought.”Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences47(3): 302-321.
VessuriH.GuédonJ. C. and CettoA. M.2013. “Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development.”Current Sociology62 (5): 647-665.
WittekR. and WitteloostuijnA.2013. “Rational Choice and Organizational Change.” Pp. 556-588 in The handbook of rational choice social research edited by R.WittekT. A. B.Snijders and V.Nee. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
ZafirovskiM.2007. “Convergent origins, divergent destinations: sociology’s contributions and connections to economics in a historical and interdisciplinary framework.”Social science information46(2): 305-354.