‘Global Sociology’ from a Comparative Perspective: A Multidimensional Analysis

in Comparative Sociology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



This paper applies a comparative approach to analyze several dimensions of ‘Global Sociology’ from a normative stance based on a critical review of related discourses in sociological communities. The author reveals three major problems in intra-disciplinary, inter-disciplinary and extra-academic dimensions, manifested not only in ‘factual’ (objective) characteristics but also in ‘ideological’ visions typical of academic communities and connected with a negative stance towards global neoliberalism and its various agents: first, rigid vertical stratification of the international academic field, primarily, in terms of academic publishing and working conditions; second, negative tendencies in the status positions of sociology compared to other sciences, especially economics; and third, little cooperation with policy-makers and corporate practitioners combined with an orientation to supporting various discriminated groups against dominating powers associated with neoliberalism.

‘Global Sociology’ from a Comparative Perspective: A Multidimensional Analysis

in Comparative Sociology



  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2017. “Historical Trends in Federal R&D” (American Association for the Advancement of Science). Retrieved August 16 2017 (https://www.aaas.org/page/historical-trends-federal-rd).

  • American Sociological Association. 2017. “Sociological Practice and Public Sociology” (American Sociological Association). Retrieved August 16 2017 (http://www.asanet.org/asa-communities/sections/sociological-practice-and-public-sociology).

  • AppelbaumR. P. and RobinsonW. I. (Eds.). 2005. Critical globalization studies. New York: Routledge.

  • AscioneG. 2015. “Dissonant Notes on the Post‐Secular: Unthinking Secularization in Global Historical Sociology.” Journal of Historical Sociology 30: 403-434.

  • BackL. 2009. “Global attentiveness and the sociological ear.” Sociological Research Online 14(4): 14.

  • BarcanR. 2016. Academic life and labour in the new university: Hope and other choices. London and New York: Routledge.

  • BastowS.DunleavyP. and TinklerJ. 2014. The impact of the social sciences: how academics and their research make a difference. London: Sage.

  • BeckU. 1999. What is Globalization? Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • BeckU. 2000. “The cosmopolitan perspective: Sociology of the second age of modernity.” British Journal of Sociology 51(1): 79-105.

  • BeckU. 2012. “Redefining the sociological project: the cosmopolitan challenge.” Sociology 46(1): 7-12.

  • BeigelF. 2014. “Publishing from the periphery: Structural heterogeneity and segmented circuits. The evaluation of scientific publications for tenure in Argentina’s conicet.” Current Sociology 62(5): 743-765.

  • BergerP. L. 1997. “Four faces of global culture.” The National Interest 49: 23-29.

  • BhambraG. K. 2013. “The possibilities of, and for, global sociology: A postcolonial perspective.” Political Power and Social Theory 24: 295-314.

  • BhambraG. K. 2014. Connected sociologies. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

  • BlackD. 2013. “On the almost inconceivable misunderstandings concerning the subject of value‐free social science.” The British journal of sociology 64(4): 763-780.

  • BoliJ. 2005. “Contemporary developments in world culture.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 46(5-6): 383-404.

  • BrennerN. and TheodoreN. 2002. “Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism.” Antipode 34(3): 349-379.

  • BrennerN. 1999. “Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalization studies.” Theory and society: 28(1): 39-78.

  • BrewerJ. D. 2013. The Public Value of the Social Sciences: An Interpretive Essay. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

  • BreznitzS. M. 2014. The Fountain of Knowledge: The Role of Universities in Economic Development. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • British Sociological Association. 2017. “Activism in Sociology Forum” (British Sociological Association). Retrieved August 16 2017 (https://www.britsoc.co.uk/groups/special-interest-groups/activism-in-sociology-forum/).

  • BrohmanJ. 1995. “Universalism, Eurocentrism, and ideological bias in development studies: from modernisation to neoliberalism.” Third World Quarterly 16: 121-140.

  • BrownA. and SpencerD. A. 2014. “Understanding the Global Financial Crisis: Sociology, Political Economy and Heterodox Economics.” Sociology 48(5): 938-953.

  • BulbeckC. 1998. Re-orienting Western Feminisms: Women’s Diversity in a Postcolonial World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • BurawoyM. 2005. “For public sociology.” American sociological review 70(1): 4-28.

  • BurawoyM. 2008. “Rejoinder: For a Subaltern Global Sociology?” Current Sociology 56(3): 435-444.

  • BurawoyM. 2015. “Facing an unequal world.” Current Sociology 63(1): 5-34.

  • ButolloF. 2017. “Sociology as science and action.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 42(1): 91-94.

  • ByrneD. 2012. uk sociology and quantitative methods: Are we as weak as they think? Or are they barking up the wrong tree?” Sociology 46(1): 13-24.

  • CallonM. 2016. “Revisiting marketization: from interface-markets to market-agencements.” Consumption Markets & Culture 19(1): 17-37.

  • CañónC.FriebelG. and SeabrightP. 2013. Market Design and Market Failure.” Pp. 473-512 in The handbook of rational choice social research edited by R. WittekT. A. B. Snijders and V. Nee. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

  • ChorevN. 2010. “Fixing Globalization Institutionally: us Domestic Politics of International Trade.” International Sociology 25(1): 54-74.

  • ComaroffJ. and ComaroffJ. L. 2011. Theory from the South: Or How Euro-America is Evolving towards Africa. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

  • ConnellR. 2007. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

  • ConnellR.CollyerF.MaiaJ. and MorrellR. 2017. “Toward a global sociology of knowledge: Post-colonial realities and intellectual practices.” International Sociology 32(1): 21-37.

  • CoxL. 2014. “Movements making knowledge: a new wave of inspiration for sociology?” Sociology 48(5): 954-971.

  • DenzauA. D. and NorthD. C. 2000. “Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions.” Pp. 23-46 in Elements of Reason: Cognition Choice and the Bounds of Rationality edited by A. LupiaM. C.McCubbins and S. L. Popkin. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • DinersteinA. C.SchwartzG. and TaylorG. 2014. “Sociological Imagination as Social Critique: Interrogating the ‘Global Economic Crisis’.” Sociology 48(5): 859-868.

  • DouglassJ. A. 2016. “How Rankings Came to Determine World Class.” Pp. 9-29 edited by DouglassJ. A. The New Flagship University. International and Development Education. Palgrave MacmillanNew York.

  • DowlingE. and HarvieD. 2014. “Harnessing the Social: State, Crisis and (Big) Society.” Sociology 48(5): 869-886.

  • ErolaJ. 2010. “Why probability has not succeeded in sociology”. Sociology 44(1): 121-138.

  • European Sociological Association. 2017a. “(Un)Making Europe: Capitalism, Solidarities, Subjectivities” (European Sociological Association). Retrieved December 4 2017 (https://www.europeansociology.org/conferences/un-making-europe).

  • European Sociological Association. 2017b. “Research Networks” (European Sociological Association). Retrieved August 16 2017 (http://www.europeansociology.org/research-networks/).

  • FineB. and MilonakisD. 2009. From Economics Imperialism to Freakonomics: The Shifting Boundaries between Economics and Other Social Sciences. London: Routledge.

  • FourcadeM.OllionE. and AlganY. 2015. “The superiority of economists.” Revista de Economía Institucional 17(33): 13-43.

  • GaneN. 2014. “Sociology and neoliberalism: A missing history.” Sociology 48(6): 1092-1106.

  • GriffithsD. 2010. “Academic influence amongst the uk public elite.” Sociology 44(4): 734-750.

  • HabibA. 2008. “Speaking Truth to All Forms of Power Reflections on the Role of the Public Sociologist in South Africa.” Current Sociology 56(3): 389-398.

  • HallidayT. C. and JanowitzM. 1992. Sociology and its publics: The forms and fates of disciplinary organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • HalseyA. H. 1992. Decline of Donnish Dominion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • HardingS. 2015. Objectivity and diversity: Another logic of scientific research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • HarveyD. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hassan-MonteroY.Guerrero-BoteV. P. and De-Moya-AnegónF. 2014. “Graphical interface of the Scimago Journal and Country Rank: an interactive approach to accessing bibliometric information.” El profesional de la información 23(3): 272-278.

  • HeilbronJ. 2014. “The social sciences as an emerging global field.” Current Sociology 62(5): 685-703.

  • HoenigB. 2017. Europe’s New Scientific Elite: Social Mechanisms of Science in the European Research Area. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.

  • HolmwoodJ. 2009. “The challenge of global social inquiry.” Sociological Research Online 14(4): 13.

  • HolmwoodJ. 2010. “Sociology’s misfortune: disciplines, interdisciplinarity and the impact of audit culture.” The British journal of sociology 61(4): 639-658.

  • HolmwoodJ. 2013. “Public Reasoning without Sociology: Amartya Sen’s Theory of Justice.” Sociology 47(6): 1171-1186.

  • International Sociological Association. 2017a. “Research Committees” (International Sociological Association). Retrieved August 16 2017 (http://www.isa-sociology.org/en/research-networks/research-committees/).

  • International Sociological Association. 2017b. “Research Committee on Poverty, Social Welfare and Social Policy” (International Sociological Association). Retrieved August 16 2017 (http://www.rc19.org/).

  • KellnerD. 2002. “Theorizing globalization.” Sociological theory 20(3): 285-305.

  • KempleT. M. and MawaniR. 2009. “The sociological imagination and its imperial shadows.” Theory Culture & Society 26(7-8): 228-249.

  • KennedyM. and CentenoM. 2007. “Internationalism and global transformations in American sociology.” Pp. 666-712 in Sociology in America edited by C. Calhoun. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  • KennedyP. 2009. Local lives and global transformations: Towards world society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • KiserE. and PowersE. 2013. “Rational Choice Approaching to State-Making.” Pp. 443-472 in The handbook of rational choice social research edited by R. WittekT. A. B. Snijders and V. Nee. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

  • KleinN. 2007. The Shock Doctrine. London: Penguin.

  • KrierD. 2009. “Finance capital, neo-liberalism and critical institutionalism.” Critical Sociology 35(3): 395-416.

  • KrückenG.KosmützkyA. and TorkaM. 2007. Towards a multiversity?: Universities between global trends and national traditions. Bielefeld: Transcript.

  • LevienM. and ParetM. 2012. “A second double movement? Polanyi and shifting global opinions on neoliberalism.” International Sociology 27 (6): 724-744.

  • LiuHong and Liu. 2012. “A Bibliometric Analysis of 20 Years of Globalization Research: 1990-2009.” Globalizations 9 (2): 195-210.

  • LiuL. and LiuZ. 2016. “The variation of universally acknowledged world-class universities (uawcus) between 2010 and 2015: An empirical study by the ranks of thes, qs and arwu.” Higher Education Studies 6(4): 54-69.

  • MadraY. M. and AdamanF. 2014. “Neoliberal Reason and Its Forms: De‐Politicisation Through Economisation.” Antipode 46(3): 691-716.

  • MaiaJ. 2014. “History of sociology and the quest for intellectual autonomy in the Global South: The cases of Alberto Guerreiro Ramos and Syed Hussein Alatas.” Current Sociology 62(7): 1097-1115.

  • MarginsonS. 2016a. “The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems.” Higher Education72(4): 413-434.

  • MarginsonS. 2016b. “High participation systems of higher education.” The Journal of Higher Education 87(2): 243-271.

  • MarginsonS. 2016c. “The global construction of higher education reform.” Pp. 291-311 in The Handbook of Global Education Policy edited by K. MundyA. GreenB. LingardA. VergerChichester, UK; Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.

  • MarimonR.GuardiancichI.MariathasanM.RossiE. 2011. “Survey on research funding for the social sciences in Europe” (European University Institute). Retrieved December 4 2017 (http://www.eui.eu/Documents/MWP/Publications/20111012MWP-ACOSurveyResearchFunding-Full.pdf).

  • MeyerJ. W. 2010. “World society, institutional theories, and the actor.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 1-20.

  • MirowskiP. and PlehweD. (eds). 2009. The Road from Mont Pèlerin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • MirowskiP. and SentE-M. 2008. “The commercialization of science and the response of STS” Pp. 635-689 in The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies edited by HackettE. J. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • MongeonP. and Paul-HusA. 2016. “The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis.” Scientometrics 106(1): 213-228.

  • MooreK.KleinmanD. L.HessD. and FrickelS. 2011. “Science and neoliberal globalization: a political sociological approach.” Theory and Society 40(5): 505-532.

  • Mosbah-NatansonS. and GingrasY. 2014. “The globalization of social sciences? Evidence from a quantitative analysis of 30 years of production, collaboration and citations in the social sciences (1980-2009).” Current Sociology 62(5): 626-646.

  • MouffeC. 1979. Hegemony and ideology in Gramsci. Gramsci and Marxist theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  • National Science Foundationusa. 2017a. “Federal obligations for research by detailed field of science and engineering” (National Science Foundation). Retrieved August 16 2017 (https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/fedfunds/2015/html/FFS2015_DST_134.html).

  • National Science Foundationusa. 2017b. “Federal obligations for basic research by detailed field of science and engineering” (National Science Foundation). Retrieved August 16 2017 (https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/fedfunds/2015/html/FFS2015_DST_033.html).

  • NeeV. and AlbaR. 2013. “Assimilation as Rational Action in Contexts Defined by Institutions and Boundaries.” Pp. 355-380 in The handbook of rational choice social research edited by R. WittekT. A. B. Snijders and V. Nee. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

  • OmobowaleA. O. 2015. “Stories of the ‘dark’ continent: Crude constructions, diasporic identity, and international aid to Africa.” International Sociology 30(2): 108-118.

  • OmobowaleA. O.AkanleO.AdeniranA. I. and AdegboyegaK. 2014. “Peripheral scholarship and the context of foreign paid publishing in Nigeria.” Current Sociology 62(5): 666-684.

  • PereiraM.d.M. 2015. “Higher Education Cutbacks and the Reshaping of Epistemic Hierarchies: An Ethnography of the Case of Feminist Scholarship.” Sociology 49(2): 287-304.

  • RamirezF. O.MeyerJ. W. and LerchJ. 2016. “World society and the globalization of educational policy.” Pp. 43-63 in Handbook on global policy and policy making in education edited by K. MundyA. GreenB. LingardA. Verger. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • RobertsonR. 1992. Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: Sage.

  • RosaM. C. 2014. “Theories of the South: Limits and perspectives of an emergent movement in social sciences.” Current Sociology 62(6): 851-867.

  • SantosB. S. 2012. “The university at a crossroads. Human Architecture.” Journal of the sociology of self-knowledge 10(1): 7-16.

  • SantosB. S. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

  • SchmidtV. 2014. Global Modernity: A Conceptual Sketch. New York: Palgrave.

  • Scimago Journal and Country Rank. 2017a. “Country rank” (Scimago Journal and Country Rank). Retrieved August 16 2017 (http://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php?category=3312&year=2016).

  • Scimago Journal and Country Rank. 2017b. “Journal rank” (Scimago Journal and Country Rank). Retrieved August 16 2017 (http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?category=3312).

  • Scimago Journal and Country Rank. 2017c. “Shape of Science” (Scimago Journal and Country Rank). Retrieved August 16 2017 (http://www.scimagojr.com/shapeofscience/).

  • ShattockM. 2001. “‘The Academic Profession in Britain: A Study in the Failure to Adapt to Change’.” Higher Education 41(1): 27-41.

  • SitasA. 2014. “Rethinking Africa’s sociological project.” Current Sociology 62(4): 457-471.

  • SorokinP. 2015. “The Russian sociological tradition from the xixth century until the present: Key features and possible value for current discussions”. The American Sociologist 46(3): 341-355.

  • SorokinP. 2016a. “ ‘Global sociology’ in different disciplinary practices: Current conditions, problems and perspectives”. Current Sociology 64(1): 41-59.

  • SorokinP. 2016b. “Ethically responsible Global Sociology: conceptual framing of a new vision”. Filosifija sociologija 27(4): 323-330.

  • SorokinP. 2017. “Vision and mission of sociology: Learning from the Russian historical experience”. The American Sociologist 48(2): 135-171.

  • SpringerS. 2016. “Fuck neoliberalism.” acme: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 15(2): 285-292.

  • SztompkaP. 1988. “Conceptual frameworks in comparative inquiry: Divergent or convergent?” International Sociology 3(3): 207-218.

  • TherbornG. 1976. Science Class & Society. London: New Left Books.

  • Times Higher Education. 2017. “World University Rankings 2016-2017” (Times Higher Education). Retrieved August 16 2017 (https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2017/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/subjects/4185/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats).

  • TodeschiniR. and BacciniA. 2016. Handbook of bibliometric indicators: quantitative tools for studying and evaluating research. Weinheim: John Wiley & Sons.

  • ToscanoA. 2014. “Reformism and Melancholia: Economic Crisis and the Limits of Sociology.” Sociology 48(5): 1024-1038.

  • UrryJ. 1999. “Globalization and citizenship.” Journal of World-Systems Research 5(2): 311-324.

  • Van HornR. and KlaesM. 2011. “Chicago neoliberalism versus Cowles planning: Perspectives on patents and public goods in Cold War Economic Thought.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 47(3): 302-321.

  • VessuriH.GuédonJ. C. and CettoA. M. 2013. “Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development.” Current Sociology 62 (5): 647-665.

  • WangQ. and WaltmanL. 2016. “Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus.” Journal of Informetrics 10(2): 347-364.

  • Web of Science. 2017. “Journal Citation Reports” (Thomson Reuters). Retrieved August 16 2017 (https://jcr.incites.thomsonreuters.com).

  • WeckowskaD. M. 2015. “Learning in university technology transfer offices: Transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research.” Technovation 41: 62-74.

  • WhitesideN. and MahA. 2012. “Human rights and ethical reasoning: capabilities, conventions and spheres of public action.” Sociology 46(5): 921-935.

  • WittekR. and WitteloostuijnA. 2013. “Rational Choice and Organizational Change.” Pp. 556-588 in The handbook of rational choice social research edited by R. WittekT. A. B. Snijders and V. Nee. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

  • YuanS. 2008. “Strong and Weak Intervention: Two Pathways for Sociological Intervention.” Current Sociology 56(3): 399-404.

  • ZafirovskiM. 2007. “Convergent origins, divergent destinations: sociology’s contributions and connections to economics in a historical and interdisciplinary framework.” Social science information 46(2): 305-354.

  • ZafirovskiM. 2014. “Sociological dimensions in classical/neoclassical economics: Conceptions of social economics and economic sociology.” Social Science Information 53(1): 76-118.

  • ZafirovskiM. 2016. “Toward Economic Sociology/Socio-Economics? Sociological Components in Contemporary Economics and Implications for Sociology.” The American Sociologist 47 (1): 56-80.

  • ZinckeC. R. 2014. “Local and global communications in Chilean social science: Inequality and relative autonomy.” Current Sociology (62)5: 704-722.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 202 202 31
Full Text Views 188 188 1
PDF Downloads 9 9 1
EPUB Downloads 1 1 0