Human Rights: Why Countries Differ

in Comparative Sociology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Countries differ with respect to human rights. Using the cross-country ciri data (Cingranelli & Richards), the authors tested two theories. The cognitive-moral enlightenment theory going back to Piaget and Socrates postulates that individuals and nations with higher levels of cognitive ability think and behave in a way more conducive to human rights. The culture-religion theory going back to Weber, Sombart and Voltaire postulates that different religious beliefs shape attitudes, and propel societies toward institutions that are more or less supportive of human rights. Cognitive ability had a positive impact on human rights but its effect varied depending on the country sample. More important was religion, both in cross-sectional and longitudinal models. Percentage of Christians had a positive impact (r = .62, total effect β = .63), percentage of Muslims had a negative one (r = −.57, total effect β = −.59). Political institutions are highly correlated with human rights, but religion is the decisive background factor.

Human Rights: Why Countries Differ

in Comparative Sociology

Sections

References

American Anthropological Association (1947). Statement on human rights. American Anthropologist49539-543.

Aristotle (2000/-322). Nicomachean ethics. Translated and edited by Roger Crisp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ArmstrongJ. S. (2007). Significance tests harm progress in forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting23321-327.

BaierD.PfeifferC.RaboldS.SimonsonJ. & KappesC. (2010). Kinder und Jugendliche in Deutschland. [Children and youth in Germany: Exposure to violence integration media consumption.] Hannover: KFNReport No. 109.

BarroR. J. & LeeJ.-W. (2000). Barro-Lee data set. International data on educational attainment: updates and implications. Boston: Harvard University.

BealsK. L.SmithC.L. & DoddS. M. (1984). Brain size, cranial morphology, climate, and time machines. Current Anthropology25301-330.

BeckerD. & RindermannH. (2016). The relationship between cross-national genetic distances and iq-differences. Personality and Individual Differences98300-310.

BeckerS. O. & WoessmannL. (2007). Was Weber wrong? A human capital theory of Protestant economic history. Cesifo Working Paper No. 1987.

BenerA.Abou-SalehM. T.MohammadR. M.DafeeahE. E.VentriglioA. & BhugraD. (2016). Does consanguinity increase the risk of mental ilnesses? A population-based study. International Journal of Culture and Mental Health9172-181.

BiasuttiR. (1967). Le razze e i popoli della terra. [Races and peoples of the earth.] Torino: Union Tipografico-Editrice.

BittlesA. H. (2001). Consanguinity/endogamy resource. Retrieved from www.consang.net.

BoltJ. & van ZandenJ. L. (2013). The first update of the Maddison Project. Re-estimating growth before 1820. Groningen: Maddison-Project Working Paper wp-4. Data retrieved from www.ggdc.net/maddison/maddison-project/data/mpd_2013-01.xlsx.

BurckhardtJ. (1943/1905). Reflections on history. London: George Allen & Unwin.

CarlN. (2016). An analysis of Islamist terrorism across western countries. Open Quantitative Sociology and Political Science. Retrieved from https://openpsych.net/paper/9.

CarlN. (2017a). A global analysis of Islamist terrorism. Open Quantitative Sociology and Political Science. Retrieved from https://openpsych.net/paper/52

CarlN. (2017b). Ethnicity and electoral fraud in Britain. Electoral Studies50128-136.

ChagnonN. A. (1977). Yanomamö. The fierce people. New York: Holt.

CingranelliD. L. & RichardsD. L. (1999). Measuring the level, pattern, and sequence of government respect for physical integrity rights. International Studies Quarterly43407-417.

CingranelliD. L. & RichardsD. L. (2010). The Cingranelli and Richards (ciri) human rights data project. Human Rights Quarterly32401-424.

CingranelliD. L.RichardsD. L. & ClayK. Ch. (2014). The CIRI Human Rights Dataset. Version: 2014.04.14. Retrieved from www.humanrightsdata.com.

ClarkG. (2007). A farewell to alms. A brief economic history of the world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

CohenJ. (1994). The earth is round (p<.05). American Psychologist49997-1003.

CoyleTh. R. & RindermannH. (2013). Spearman’s Law of Diminishing Returns and national ability. Personality and Individual Differences55406-410.

CoyleTh. R.RindermannH. & HancockD. (2016). Cognitive capitalism: Economic freedom moderates the effects of intellectual and average classes on economic productivity. Psychological Reports119411-427.

CoyleTh. R.RindermannH.HancockD. G. & FreemanJ. (2018). Nonlinear effects of cognitive ability on economic productivity. Journal of Individual Differences3939-47.

CunhaF.HeckmanJ. J.LochnerL. & MasterovD. V. (2006). Interpreting the evidence on life cycle skill formation. In E. A. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.) Handbook of the economics of education (I pp. 697-812). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

DelheyJ. & NewtonK. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review21311-327.

EliasN. (2000/1939). The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

FeyrerJ. & SacerdoteB. (2009). Colonialism and modern income: Islands as natural experiments. Review of Economics and Statistics91245-262.

Freedom House (2013). Freedom in the world. Washington.

FrostP. (2010). The Roman state and genetic pacification. Evolutionary Psychology8376-389.

FrostP. & HarpendingH. C. (2015). Western Europe, state formation, and genetic pacification. Evolutionary Psychology13230-243.

GigerenzerG. (2004). Mindless statistics. Journal of Socio-Economics33587-606.

HabermasJ. (1984/1981). The theory of communicative action. Vol. 1 and 2. Boston: Beacon.

HabermasJ. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

HajnalJ. (1965). European marriage patterns in perspective. In D. V. Glass & D. E. C. Eversley (Eds.) Population in history (pp. 101-143). London: Arnold.

HarrisonL. E. (2013). Jews Confucians and Protestants: Cultural capital and the end of multiculturalism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

HattieJ. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

HausmannR.TysonL. D. & ZahidiS. (2011). Global gender gap report 2011. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

HestonA.SummersR. & AtenB. (2012). Penn World Table Version 7.1. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices. Retrieved from https://pwt.sas.upenn.edu/php_site/pwt_index.php.

IshayM. (2004). What are human rights? Six historical controversies. Journal of Human Rights3359-371.

JablonskiN. G. & ChaplinG. (2000). The evolution of human skin coloration. Journal of Human Evolution3957-106.

Jahrbuch (2004). Jahrbuch. München: DTV.

JensenA. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. London: Methuen.

JensenA. R. (1983). Effects of inbreeding on mental-ability factors. Personality and Individual Differences471-87.

JonesG. (2016). Hive mind: How your nation’s IQ matters so much more than your own. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

KaufmannD.KraayA. & MastruzziM. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: A summary of methodology data and analytical issues. The worldwide governance indicators 2012 update. Washington: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430.

KirkegaardE. O. W. (2014a). Criminality and fertility among Danish immigrant populations. Open Differential Psychology. Retrieved from http://openpsych.net/ODP/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/criminality_fertility.pdf.

KirkegaardE. O. W. (2014b). Criminality among Norwegian immigrant populations. Open Differential Psychology. Retrieved from http://openpsych.net/ODP/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/criminality_norway-final.pdf.

KirkegaardE. O. W. (2015). Crime among Dutch immigrant groups is predictable from country level variables. Open Differential Psychology. Retrieved from http://openpsych.net/ODP/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Kirkegaard2015DutchCrime.pdf.

KohlbergL. (1984). Essays on moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

KoopmansR. (2014). Religious fundamentalism and out-group hostility among Muslims and Christians in Western Europe. Berlin: wzb Discussion Paper spvi 2014-2101.

KrebsD. & GillmoreJ. (1982). The relationship among the first stages of cognitive development, role-taking abilities, and moral development. Child Development53877-886.

KurianG. T. (2001). The illustrated book of world rankings. Armonk: Sharpe.

LandmanT. (2004). Measuring human rights: Principle, practice and policy. Human Rights Quarterly26906-931.

LaurenP. G. (2011). The evolution of international human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

LynnR. & VanhanenT. (2012). Intelligence. A unifying construct for the social sciences. London: Ulster Institute for Social Research.

MaddisonA. (2008). Statistics on world population GDP and per capita GDP 1-2008 AD. Retrieved from www.ggdc.net/maddison/Historical_Statistics/horizontal-file_02-2010.xls.

MankiwN. G.RomerD. & WeilD. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics107407-437.

MarshallM. G.GurrT. R. & JaggersK. (2013). Polity IV project. Political regime characteristics and transitions 1800-2012. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.

MarxK. (1854). Declaration of war. On the history of the eastern question. New-York Herald Tribune4054.

McCloskeyD. N. (2006). The bourgeois virtues: Ethics for an age of commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

McNameeS. (1977). Moral behaviour, moral development and motivation. Journal of Moral Education727-31.

NietzscheF. (2009/1885). Thus spake Zarathustra. New York: Cosimo.

NorthD. C.WallisJ. J. & WeingastB. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

OesterdiekhoffG. W. (2009a). The arena games in the roman empire: A contribution to the explanation of the history of morals and humanity. Narodna Umjetnost46177-202.

OesterdiekhoffG. W. (2009b). Trials against animals: A contribution to the developmental theory of mind and rationality. Mankind Quarterly49346-380.

OesterdiekhoffG. W. (2014). Evolution of law and justice from ancient to modern times. Journal on European History of Law554-64.

OesterdiekhoffG. W. (2016). The cognitive-developmental approach as contribution to the explanation of the Arabian migrants’ criminality. Russian Journal of Sociology452-61.

PiagetJ. (1948/1932). The moral judgment of the child. Glencoe: Free Press.

PiagetJ. (2001/1947). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge.

PinkerS. (2011). Taming the devil within us. Nature478309-311.

Plato (1997/-350). Complete works. Indianapolis: Hackett.

PolletTh. V. (2013). Much ado about p. What does a p-value mean when testing hypotheses with aggregated cross-cultural data in the field of evolution and human behavior? Frontiers in Psychology41-3.

PosnerE. (2014). The twilight of human rights law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

PuttermanL. & WeilD. N. (2010). Post-1500 population flows and the long run determinants of economic growth and inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics1251627-1682.

RindermannH. (2013). African cognitive ability: Research, results, divergences and recommendations. Personality and Individual Differences55229-233.

RindermannH. & ThompsonJ. (2013). Ability rise in naep and narrowing ethnic gaps? Intelligence41821-831.

RindermannH. & ThompsonJ. (2016). The cognitive competences of immigrant and native students across the world: An analysis of gaps, possible causes and impact. Journal of Biosocial Science4866-93.

RindermannH.BeckerD. & CoyleTh. R. (2016). Survey of expert opinion on intelligence: Causes of international differences in cognitive ability tests. Frontiers in Psychology7(399) 1-9.

RindermannH.Kodila-TedikaO. & ChristainsenG. (2015). Cognitive capital, good governance, and the wealth of nations. Intelligence5198-108.

RusselJ. (2012). Human rights: The Universal Declaration vs. The Cairo Declaration. LSE Middle East Center Blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mec/2012/12/10/1569

SchulzJ. F. (2017). The churches’ bans on consanguineous marriages, kin-networks and democracy. Research Gate. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/313115096_The_Churches’_Bans_on_Consanguineous_Marriages_Kin-networks_and_Democracy

ShriverM. D.ParraE. J.DiosS.BonillaC.NortonH. & et al. (2003). Skin pigmentation, biogeographical ancestry and admixture mapping. Human Genetics112387-399.

SolonI. (2014). How intelligence mediates liberalism and pro-sociality. Intelligence4744-53.

SombartW. (1998/1913). The quintessence of capitalism: A study of the history and psychology of the modern business man. London: Routledge.

SteppanM. (2010). Protestantism and intelligence: Max Weber and the Rindermann-paradox. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment5134-154.

TadmouriG. O.NairP.ObeidT.AliM. T. A.KhajaN. A. & HamamyH. A. (2009). Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs. Reproductive Health61-9.

TemplerD. I. & ArikawaH. (2006). Temperature, skin color, per capita income, and iq: An international perspective. Intelligence34121-128.

te NijenhuisJ. (2010). Mean intelligence of immigrants from developing countries living in developed countries. Presentation at the ii Latin American Congress of Psychological Assessment. Belo Horizonte23-09-10.

TocquevilleA. d. (2010/1835). Democracy in America. Historical-critical edition of De la démocratie en Amérique. Volumes i to iv. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

VanhanenT. & Åbo Akademi (2013). Measures of democracy. Tampere: Finnish Social Science Data Archive.

Voltaire (2013/1736). Fanaticism or Mahomet the prophet. Sacramento: Litwin.

WeberM. (2008/1904). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

WeedeE. (2012). Liberty in comparative perspective. China, India, and the West. In F. McMahon (Ed.) Towards a worldwide index of human freedom (pp. 189-241). Vancouver: Fraser Institute, Liberales Institut.

who (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (WHO).

WoodR. M. & GibneyM. (2010). The Political Terror Scale (pts): A re-introduction and a comparison to ciri. Human Rights Quarterly32367-400.

WoodleyM. A. (2009). Inbreeding depression and iq in a study of 72 countries. Intelligence37268-276.

WoodleyM. A. & BellE. (2013). Consanguinity as a major predictor of levels of democracy: A study of 70 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology44263-280.

Figures

  • View in gallery
    Path analysis with only religion and cognitive ability for explaining cross-country differences in human rights (standardized path coefficients, correlations in parentheses, fiml, error term as unexplained variance, saturated model), N = 191 nations.
  • View in gallery
    Path analysis including intervening variables for explaining cross-country differences in human rights (cfi = .98, srmr = .05), N = 191 nations.
  • View in gallery
    Path analysis for explaining cross-country differences in human rights including evolution (cfi = .99, srmr = .04), N = 191 nations.
  • View in gallery
    Path analysis for explaining cross-country differences in human rights with rule of law (cfi = .97, srmr = .07), N = 191 nations.
  • View in gallery
    Path analysis for explaining cross-country differences in human rights with percentage of Muslims (cfi = .97, srmr = .06), N = 191 nations.
  • View in gallery
    Path analysis for explaining cross-country differences in women’s rights with consanguinity (cfi = .97, srmr = .04), N = 74 nations with data on consanguinity.
  • View in gallery
    Longitudinal analysis showing cross-lagged effects with percentage of Christians, cognitive ability (student assessment studies sas) and human rights (standardized path coefficients, correlations in parentheses, error term as unexplained variance, saturated model), N = 51 nations with information for all variables.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 198 198 185
Full Text Views 71 71 71
PDF Downloads 8 8 8
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0