Historicizing Secularity
A Proposal for Comparative Research from a Global Perspective
In: Comparative SociologySearch for other papers by Monika Wohlrab-Sahr in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Christoph Kleine in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Drawing upon the critique of secularization theory, especially its lack of historical depth, this article outlines a research agenda that focuses on a specific – but fundamental – aspect of secularization: it aims at the historicization of conceptual distinctions and institutional differentiations between the religious and the secular. The authors employ the heuristic concept of ‘secularity’ to refer to these demarcations, and argue that secularization studies should give due consideration to their historical predecessors in various world regions. This seems important against the background of enduring criticisms, which consider such distinctions and differentiations either as an exclusively Western achievement or as a colonial imposition on non-Western regions. Taking into account the development of different historical paths, the authors highlight the transcultural, but in its concrete shape nevertheless culturally specific emergence of distinctions and differentiations related to religion, and propose secularity as a tertium comparationis for comparative research in this field. The authors introduce two different religious and societal settings in the medieval period – Japanese Buddhism and Islam in the Middle East – in order to illustrate the divergent ideational and structural backgrounds to the development of relations between the religious and the secular.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abbasi, R. 2020. “Did Premodern Muslims Distinguish the Religious and Secular? The Dīn – Dunyā Binary in Medieval Islamic Thought.” Journal of Islamic Studies 31, 2: 185–225.
-
Abbasi, R. 2021. “Islam and the Invention of Religion: A Study of Medieval Muslim Discourses on Dīn.” Studia Islamica 116: 1–106.
-
Adolphson, M.S. 2000. The Gates of Power: Monks, Courtiers, and Warriors in Premodern Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
-
Ahmed, S. 2015. What is Islam? The Importance of Being Islamic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Akasoy, A.A. 2015–6. “Al-Ghazali’s Veil Section: Comparative Religion before Religionswissenschaft?” Pp. 142–167 in Islam and Rationality: The Impact of Al-Ghazali: Papers Collected on His 900th Anniversary, edited by G. Tamer and F. Griffel. Leiden: Brill.
-
Asad, T. 2003. Formations of the Secular. Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
Berman, H. 1983. Law and Revolution, the Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
-
Bhargava, R. 2010. “The ‘Secular Ideal’ Before Secularism: A Preliminary Sketch.” Pp 159–180 in Comparative secularisms in a global age, edited by L.E. Cady and E.S. Hurd. 1st ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Black, A. 2011. The History of Islamic Political Thought. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
-
Bowering, G. (Ed.). 2012. The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Bruce, S. 1999. “Modernization, Religious Diversity, and Rational Choice in Eastern Europe”, Religion, State & Society 27(3/4): 265–275.
-
Casanova, J. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: CUP.
-
Casanova, J. 2006. “Rethinking Secularization: A Global Comparative Perspective”, The Hedgehog Review 1/2: 7–22.
-
Casanova, J. 2011. “The Secular, Secularizations, Secularisms.” In Rethinking Secularism, edited by Craig J. Calhoun, 54–74. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
-
Chamberlain, B.H. 1912. The Invention of a New Religion. London: Watts & Co. Retrieved June 24, 2014. http://hoary.org/scand/invent.html.
-
Chaves, M. 1994. “Secularization as Declining Religious Authority.” Social Forces 72(3): 749–774.
-
Dreßler, M. 2015. “Rereading Ziya Gökalp: Secularism and Reform of the Islamic State in the Late Young Turk Period”, International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2015, 511–531.
-
Dreßler, M. 2019. “Modes of Religionization: A Constructivist Approach to Secularity.” Working Paper Series of the CASHSS “Multiple Secularities – Beyond the West, Beyond Modernities” (7).
-
Dreßler, M., Salvatore, A., and Wohlrab-Sahr, M. 2019. “Islamicate Secularities: New Perspectives on a Contested Concept.” Pp. 7–34 in: Islamicate Secularities in Past and Present, edited by M. Dressler, A. Salvatore and M. Wohlrab-Sahr, Special Issue of Historical Social Research 441, 169: 3.
-
Durkheim, E. 2008 [1915]: The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Translated by Joseph Ward Swain. Mineola, New York: Dover.
-
Eisenstadt, S.N. 2002. “Some Observations on Multiple Modernities.” Pp. 27–41 in Reflections on multiple modernities: European, Chinese, and other interpretations, edited by D. Sachsenmaier and J. Riedel, with S. Eisenstadt. Leiden: Brill.
-
Enayat, H. 2017. Islam and Secularism in Post-Colonial Thought. A Cartography of Asadian Genealogies. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
-
Esposito, J.L. 2000. “Introduction: Islam and secularism in the twenty-first century.” Pp. 1–12 in Islam and Secularism in the Middle East, edited by J.L. Esposito and A. Tamimi. London: Hurst & Company.
-
Esposito, J. and A. Tamimi (Eds.). 2000. Islam and Secularism in the Middle East. New York: New York University Press.
-
Finke R. and R. Stark 1988. “Religious Economies and Sacred Canopies: Religious Mobilization in American Cities, 1906”. American Sociological Review 53(1): 41–49.
-
Fitzgerald, T. 1997. “A critique of ‘religion’ as a cross-cultural category.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 9(2): 91–110.
-
Fujiwara, S. 2016. “Introduction: Secularity and Post-Secularity in Japan: Japanese Scholars’ Responses.” Journal of Religion in Japan 5(2/3): 93–110.
-
Gardet, L. 2012. “Din”. In: Encyclopedia of Islam, 2nd Edition, edited by P. Bearman et al. online. Retrieved May 5, 2020.
-
Gorski, P. 2000. “Historicizing the Secularization Debate: Church, State, and Society in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, ca. 1300 to 1700.” American Sociological Review 65(1): 138–167.
-
Heelas, P. and L. Woodhead 2005. The Spiritual Revolution: Why Religion is Giving Way to Spirituality. Religion and Spirituality in the Modern World. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.
-
Hermann, A. 2016. “Distinctions of Religion: The Search for Equivalents of ‘Religion’ and the Challenge of Theorizing a ‘Global Discourse of Religion’.” Pp. 97–124 in Making Religion: Theory and Practice in the Discursive Study of Religion, Supplements to method & theory in the study of religion v.4, edited by F. Wijsen and K. von Stuckrad. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
-
Hughes, A. 2015. Islam and the tyranny of authenticity: An inquiry into disciplinary apologetics and self-deception. Sheffield: Equinox
-
Höllinger, F. 1996. Volksreligion und Herrschaftskirche. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
-
Horii, M. 2016. “Critical Reflections on the Religious-Secular Dichotomy in Japan.” Pp. 260–286 in Making religion. Theory and practice in the discursive study of religion, edited by F. Wijsen and K. von Stuckrad. Leiden: Brill
-
Horii, M. 2018. “Are There ‘Religion’ and ‘the Secular’ in Premodern Japan?” Retrieved July 10, 2018. https://nsrn.net/2018/07/09/are-there-religion-and-the-secular-in-premodern-japan/.
-
Imaizumi S. 今泉定介. 1926. Jinja hi-shūkyō ron 神社非宗教論. Tōkyō: Jingū Hōsaikai 神宮奉斎会.
-
Iannaccone, L. 1991. “The Consequences of Religious Market Regulation: Adam Smith and the Economics of Religion.” Rationality and Society. 3(2): 156–177
-
Iqtidar, H., 2017. “The Islamic secular: Comments”. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 34 (2): 35–38.
-
Isomae, J. 2007. “The Formative Process of State Shinto in Relation to the Westernization of Japan: The Concept of ‘Religion’ and ‘Shinto’.” Pp. 93–101 in Religion and the Secular: Historical and Colonial Formations, edited by T. Fitzgerald. London: Equinox.
-
Jackson, S. 2017. “The Islamic secular”. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 34 (2): 1–31.
-
Jung, D. 2011. Orientalists, Islamists and the Global Public Sphere: A Genealogy of the Modern Essentialist Image of Islam. Sheffield/Oakville: Equinox Publishing.
-
Kikuchi, H. 菊地大樹. 1996. “Ōbō buppō 王法仏法.” Pp. 164–169 in Ronten Nihon bukkyō 論点・日本仏教, edited by Nihon bukkyō kenkyūkai 日本仏教研究会, Nihon no bukkyō 日本の仏教 6. Kyōto: Hōzōkan.
-
Kleine, C. 2003. “Der ‘protestantische Blick’ auf Amida: Japanische Religionsgeschichte zwischen Orientalismus und Auto-Orientalismus.” Pp. 145–193 in Religion im Spiegelkabinett: Asiatische Religionsgeschichte im Spannungsfeld zwischen Orientalismus und Okzidentalismus, edited by P. Schalk, M. Deeg, O. Freiberger, and C. Kleine. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Historia Religionum 22. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
-
Kleine, C. 2013. “Religion and the Secular in Premodern Japan from the Viewpoint of Systems Theory.” Journal of Religion in Japan 2 (1): 1–34.
-
Kleine, C. 2018. “The Secular Ground Bass of Pre-modern Japan Reconsidered: Reflections upon the Buddhist Trajectories towards Secularity.” Working Paper Series of the HCAS“Multiple Secularities – Beyond the West, Beyond Modernities” 5.
-
Kleine, C. 2019. “Formations of Secularity in Ancient Japan? On Cultural Encounters, Critical Junctures, and Path-Dependent Processes.” Journal of Religion in Japan 8 (1–3; Special Issue: Secularities in Japan): 9–45.
-
Kleine, C. and M. Wohlrab-Sahr. 2016. “Research Programme of the HCAS “Multiple Secularities – Beyond the West, Beyond Modernities”.” Working Paper Series of the CASHSS “Multiple Secularities – Beyond the West, Beyond Modernities” 1 (1). http://www.multiple-secularities.de/media/multiple_secularities_research_programme.pdf. Retrieved July 13, 2017.
-
Kleine, C., and Monika Wohlrab-Sahr. 2021. “Comparative Secularities: Tracing Social and Epistemic Structures beyond the Modern West.” Method and Theory for the Study of Religion 33: 43–72.
-
Knoblauch, H. 2009. Populäre Religion. Auf dem Weg in eine spirituelle Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/M.: Campus
-
Kollmar-Paulenz, K. 2013. “Lamas und Schamanen – Mongolische Wissensordnungen von frühen 17. bis zum 21. Jahrhundert: Ein Beitrag zur Debatte um aussereuropäische Religionsbegriffe.” Pp. 151–200 in Religion in Asien? Studien zur Anwendbarkeit des Religionsbegriffs, edited by P. Schalk, M. Deeg, O. Freiberger, C. Kleine, and A. van Nahl. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Historia Religionum 32. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
-
Krämer, G. 1999. Gottes Staat als Republik. Reflexionen zeitgenössischer Muslime zu Islam, Menschenrechten und Demokratie. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
-
Krämer, G. 2021. “Religion, Culture, and the Secular: The Case of Islam.” Working Paper Series of the Centre for Advanced Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences (CASHSS) “Multiple Secularities – Beyond the West, Beyond Modernities”, #23.
-
Künkler, M. 2012. “Theocracy”. Pp. 574–579 in The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought, edited by G. Böwering et al. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Kuroda, T. 黒田俊雄. 1975. Nihon Chūsei Kokka to Shūkyō 日本中世の国家と宗教. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
-
Kuroda, T. 1983. Ōbō to buppō: Chūseishi no kōzu 王法と仏法: 中世史の構図. Kyoto: Hōzōkan.
-
Kuroda, T. 1996a. “Buddhism and Society in the Medieval Estate System.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 23(3/4): 287–319.
-
Kuroda, T. 1996b. “The Imperial Law and the Buddhist Law.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 23(3/4): 271–285.
-
Lapidus, I. 1975. “The separation of state and religion in the development of early Islamic society.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 6: 363–385.
-
Lapidus, I. 1992. “The golden age: The political concepts of Islam.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 524: 13–25.
-
Lapidus, I. 1996. “State and religion in Islamic societies.” Past & Present 151 (5): 3–27.
-
Leder, S. 2015. “Sultanic Rule in the Mirror of Medieval Political Literature.” Pp. in Global Medieval: Mirrors for princes revisited, edited by Neguin Yavari and Regula Forster. Harvard: Harvard University Press (Ilex Foundation).
-
Luckmann, T. 1980. “Säkularisierung – ein moderner Mythos”. Pp. 161–172 in Lebenswelt und Gesellschaft. Grundstrukturen und gesellschaftliche Wandlungen. Paderborn: utb.
-
Luhmann, N. 2013 [2002]. A Systems Theory of Religion. Edited by A. Kieserling. Translated by D.A. Brenner with A. Hermann. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
March, A. 2015. “What can the Islamic past teach us about secular modernity?” Political Theory 43 (6): 838–849.
-
Martin, D. 1978. A General Theory of Secularization, Oxford: Blackwell 1978.
-
Martin, D. 2005. On Secularization: Towards a Revised General Theory. Albershot: Ashgate.
-
Martin, D. 2007. “What I Really Said About Secularization”, Dialog 46(2): 139–152.
-
McCutcheon, R.T. 1997. Manufacturing Religion. The Discourse of Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia. New York/Oxford: OUP.
-
McFarland, H.N. 1967. The Rush Hour of the Gods: A Study of New Religious Movements in Japan. New York: Macmillan.
-
Mullins, Mark. 2021. Yasukuni Fundamentalism. Japanese Religions and the Politics of Restoration, Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press.
-
Naitō K. 内藤莞爾. 1941. “Shūkyō to keizai rinri 宗教と経済倫理: Jōdoshinshū to Ōmi shōnin 浄土真宗と近江商人 [Religion und Wirtschaftsethik: Die Jōdoshinshū und die Kaufleute von Ōmi].” Nihon Shakaigaku Nenpō 日本社会学年報 8: 243–286.
-
Nakamura, H., Shosan, S. and W. Johnston. 1967. “Suzuki Shosan, 1579–1655 and the Spirit of Capitalism in Japanese Buddhism.” Monumenta Nipponica 22(1/2): 1–14.
-
Nandy, A. 1999. “The Politics of Secularism and the Recovery of Religious Tolerance”. Pp. 321–344 in: Secularism and its Critics, edited by R. Bhargava. Oxford: OUP.
-
Paramore, K. 2017. “Premodern Secularism.” Pp. 21–37 in Rots and Teeuwen 2017a.
-
Pollack, D. 2016. Religion und gesellschaftliche Differenzierung. Studien zum religiösen Wandel in Europa und den USA III. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
-
Pye, M. 2003. “Religion and Conflict in Japan with Special Reference to Shinto and Yasukuni Shrine.” Diogenes 50(3): 45–59.
-
Reader, I. 2012. “Secularisation, R.I.P.? Nonsense! the Rush Hour Away from the Gods and the Decline of Religion in Contemporary Japan.” Journal of Religion in Japan 1(1): 7–36.
-
Roesler, U. 2013. “Die Lehre, der Weg und die namenlose Religion: Mögliche Äquivalente eines Religionsbegriffs in der tibetischen Kultur.” Pp. 129–150 in Religion in Asien? Studien zur Anwendbarkeit des Religionsbegriffs, edited by P. Schalk, M. Deeg, O. Freiberger, C. Kleine, and Astrid van Nahl. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Historia Religionum 32. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
-
Rots, A.P. and M. Teeuwen (Eds.). 2017. Formations of the Secular in Japan. Japan Review (Special Issue) 30. Kyoto: International Research Center for Japanese Studies.
-
Ruegg, D.S. 1995. Ordre Spirituel Et Ordre Temporel Dans La Pensée Bouddhique De L’Inde Et Du Tibet: Quatre Conférences Au Collège De France 64. Paris: Collège de France, Institut de civilisation indienne; Diffusion De Boccard.
-
Salvatore, A. 2019. “Secularity through a ‘Soft Distinction’ in the Islamic Ecumene? Adab as a Counterpoint to Shari‘a.” Pp. 35–51 in Islamicate Secularities in Past and Present, edited by M. Dressler, A. Salvatore and M. Wohlrab-Sahr. Special Issue of Historical Social Research 44, 169: 3.
-
Satō, H. 佐藤弘夫. 1985. “Buppō ōbō sōi ron no seiritsu to tenkai 仏法王法相依論の成立と展開.” Bukkyō shigaku kenkyū 仏教史学研究 28(1): 20–40.
-
Schulze, R. 2010. “Die Dritte Unterscheidung: Islam, Religion und Säkularität.” Pp. 147–205 in: Religionen – Wahrheitsansprüche – Konflikte. Theologische Perspektiven, edited by Lienemann, W. and Dietrich, W. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich.
-
Schulze, R. 2015. Der Koran und die Genealogie des Islam. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.
-
Schwerk, D. 2019. “Drawing Lines in a Maṇḍala: A Sketch of Boundaries Between Religion and Politics in Bhutan.” Working Paper Series of the HCAS “Multiple Secularities – Beyond the West, Beyond Modernities”.
-
Sewell Jr., W.H. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” The American Journal of Sociology 98(1): 1.
-
Shimazono, S. 2005. “State Shinto and the Religious Structure of Modern Japan.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 73(4): 1077–1098.
-
Smith, C. 2003. “Introduction. Rethinking the Secularization of American Public Life.” Pp. 1–95 in The Secular Revolution, edited by C. Smith. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
-
Smith, W.C. 1991 [1962]. The Meaning and End of Religion. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Fortress Press.
-
Stark, R. 1999. “Secularization, R.I.P.” Sociology of Religion 60(3): 249–273.
-
Swyngedouw, J. 1979. “Reflections on the Secularization Thesis in the Sociology of Religion in Japan.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 6(1/2): 65–88. https://nirc.nanzan-u.ac.jp/nfile/3054. Retrieved July 03, 2014.
-
Taira, M. 1996. “Kuroda Toshio and the Kenmitsu Taisei Theory.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 23(3/4): 427–447.
-
Tamimi, A. 2000. “The Origins of Arab Secularism”. Pp. 13–28 in Islam and Secularism in the Middle East, edited by J. Esposito and A. Tamimi. New York: New York University Press.
-
Teeuwen, M. 2013. “Early Modern Secularism? Views on Religion in Seji kenbunroku (1816).” Japan Review 25: 3–19.
-
Tor, D.G. 2013, “Sultan”. Pp. 532–534 in The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought, edited by G. Böwering et al. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
van Winkle, A.B. 2012. “Separation of Religion and State in Japan: A Pragmatic Interpretation of Articles 20 and 89 of the Japanese Constitution.” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 21.
-
Warner, S.R. 1993. “Work in Progress Toward a New Paradigm for the Sociological Study of Religion in the United States”, American Journal of Sociology 98(5): 1044–1093.
-
Weber M. 1978 7. “Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen”. Pp. 237–442 in: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Vol. I. Tübingen: Mohr.
-
Wohlrab-Sahr, M. 2007. “Religionssoziologie”. Pp. 796–807 in: Gräb, W., B. Weyel (Eds.): Handbuch praktische Theologie. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.
-
Wohlrab-Sahr, M. and Burchardt, M. 2012. “Multiple Secularities: Toward a Cultural Sociology of Secular Modernities,” Comparative Sociology 11, No. 6 (2012), 875–909.
-
Yavari, N. 2014. Advice for the Sultan: Prophetic Voices and Secular Politics in Medieval Islam. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Yavari, N. 2019. “The Political Regard in Medieval Islamic Thought.” Pp. 52–73 in Islamicate Secularities in Past and Present, edited by M. Dressler, A. Salvatore and M. Wohlrab-Sahr. Special Issue of Historical Social Research 44, 169: 3.
-
Zaman, M.Q. 2012, “Ulama”. Pp. 574–579 in The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought, edited by G. Böwering et al. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Zemmin, F. 2019. “Validating Secularity in Islam: The Sociological Perspective of the Muslim Intellectual Rafiq al-‘Azm (1865–1925)”. Pp. 74–100 in Islamicate Secularities in Past and Present, edited by M. Dressler, A. Salvatore and M. Wohlrab-Sahr. Special Issue of Historical Social Research44, 169: 3.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1495 | 297 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 117 | 40 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 282 | 74 | 9 |
Historicizing Secularity
A Proposal for Comparative Research from a Global Perspective
In: Comparative SociologySearch for other papers by Monika Wohlrab-Sahr in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christoph Kleine in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Drawing upon the critique of secularization theory, especially its lack of historical depth, this article outlines a research agenda that focuses on a specific – but fundamental – aspect of secularization: it aims at the historicization of conceptual distinctions and institutional differentiations between the religious and the secular. The authors employ the heuristic concept of ‘secularity’ to refer to these demarcations, and argue that secularization studies should give due consideration to their historical predecessors in various world regions. This seems important against the background of enduring criticisms, which consider such distinctions and differentiations either as an exclusively Western achievement or as a colonial imposition on non-Western regions. Taking into account the development of different historical paths, the authors highlight the transcultural, but in its concrete shape nevertheless culturally specific emergence of distinctions and differentiations related to religion, and propose secularity as a tertium comparationis for comparative research in this field. The authors introduce two different religious and societal settings in the medieval period – Japanese Buddhism and Islam in the Middle East – in order to illustrate the divergent ideational and structural backgrounds to the development of relations between the religious and the secular.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1495 | 297 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 117 | 40 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 282 | 74 | 9 |