This article proposes a new explanation of the positive correlation between democracy and terrorism detected in many previous studies. It is shown that this might be accounted for by the fact that factional democracies are subjected to more terrorist attacks than the other political regimes. A positive relationship between the democratic regime and the level of terrorist activity can be obtained due to the inclusion of factional democracies in the sample of democratic states. If factional democracies are excluded from the sample, the relationship between the level of terrorist activity and the democratic regime is negative. The analysis allows to maintain that factional democracy is a rather powerful factor of a high level of terrorist activity, while non-factional democracy turns out to be rather a statistically significant predictor of a relatively low intensity of terrorist attacks.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abrahms, Max. (2007) Why democracies make superior counterterrorists. Security Studies 16(2): 223–253.
Aksoy, Deniz, David B. Carter, and Joseph Wright. (2012) Terrorism in dictatorships. The Journal of Politics 74(3): 810–826.
Allen, Michael. (2009) Civil Disobedience and Terrorism Testing the Limits of Deliberative Democracy. Theoria 56(118): 15–39.
Andersen, Robert, and Robert Brym. (2017) How terrorism affects attitudes toward democracy: Tunisia in 2015. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie 54(4): 519–529.
Ash, Konstantin. (2016) Representative democracy and fighting domestic terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 28(1): 114–134.
Basuchoudhary, Atin, and William F. Shughart. (2010) On ethnic conflict and the origins of transnational terrorism. Defence and Peace Economics 21(1): 65–87.
Beissinger, Marc R. (2007) Structure and example in modular political phenomena: The diffusion of bulldozer/rose/orange/tulip revolutions. Perspectives on Politics 5(2): 259–276.
Berrebi, Claude, and Esteban F. Klor. (2006) On terrorism and electoral outcomes: Theory and evidence from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(6): 899–925.
Bird, Graham S., Brock Blomberg, and Gregory D. Hess. (2008) International terrorism: Causes, consequences and cures. World Economy 31(2): 255–274.
Boehmer, Charles, and Mark Daube. (2013) The curvilinear effects of economic development on domestic terrorism. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 19(3): 359–368.
Brockhoff, Sarah, Tim Krieger, and Daniel Meierrieks. (2015) Great expectations and hard times: The (nontrivial) impact of education on domestic terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution 59(7): 1186–1215.
Brooks, Risa. (2009) Researching democracy and terrorism: how political access affects militant activity. Security Studies 18(4): 756–788.
Campos, Nauro F., and Martin Gassebner. (2009) International terrorism, political instability and the escalation effect. Zurich: KOF Swiss Economic Institute.
Chenoweth, Erica. (2010) Democratic competition and terrorist activity. The Journal of Politics 72(1): 16–30.
Chenoweth, Erica. (2013) Terrorism and democracy. Annual Review of Political Science 16: 355–378.
Conrad, Courtenay R., Justin Conrad, and Joseph K. Young. (2014) Tyrants and terrorism: Why some autocrats are terrorized while others are not. International Studies Quarterly 58(3): 539–549.
Danzell, Orlandrew E. (2011) Political parties: when do they turn to terror? Journal of Conflict Resolution 55(1): 85–105.
Davis, Darren W., and Brian D. Silver. (2004) Civil liberties vs. security: Public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science 48(1): 28–46.
Drakos, Konstantinos, and Andreas Gofas. (2006) The devil you know but are afraid to face: Underreporting bias and its distorting effects on the study of terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(5): 714–735.
Drakos, Konstantinos, and Andreas Gofas. (2007) Evidence for the existence of under-reporting bias in observed terrorist activity: the message in press freedom status transitions, Democracy and Security 3(2): 139–155.
Elbakidze, L. and Y. H. Jin. (2015) Are economic development and education improvement associated with participation in transnational terrorism? Risk Analysis 35(8): 1520–1535.
Ellingsen, Tanja, and Nils Petter Gleditsch. (1997) Democracy and armed conflict in the Third World, Causes of Conflict in Third World (eds. K. Volden, D. Smith). Oslo: North/-South Coalition & International Peace Research Institute, pp. 69–81.
Enders, Walter, Gary A. Hoover, and Todd Sandler. (2016) The changing nonlinear relationship between income and terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution 60(2): 195–225.
Esty, Daniel C., Jack A. Goldstone, Tedd R. Gurr, Barbara Harff, Marc Levy, Geoffrey D. Dabelko, Pamela T. Surko, Alan N. Unger. (1999). State failure task force report: Phase II findings. Environmental Change & Security Project Report 5: 49–72.
Findley, Michael G., and Joseph K. Young. (2011) Terrorism, democracy, and credible commitments. International Studies Quarterly 55(2): 357–378.
Foster, Dennis M., Alex Braithwaite, and David Sobek. (2013) There can be no compromise: Institutional inclusiveness, fractionalization and domestic terrorism. British Journal of Political Science 43(3): 541–557.
Frey, B. S., and S. Luechinger. (2004) Decentralization as a Disincentive for Terror. European Journal of Political Economy 20(2): 509–515.
Gadarian, Shana Kushner. (2010) The politics of threat: How terrorism news shapes foreign policy attitudes. The Journal of Politics 72(2): 469–483.
Gaibulloev, Khusrav, James A. Piazza, and Todd Sandler. (2017) Regime types and terrorism. International Organization 71(3): 491–522.
Gates, Scott, Havard Hegre, Mark P. Jones, and Havard Strand. (2006) Institutional inconsistency and political instability: Polity duration, 1800–2000. American Journal of Political Science 50(4): 893–908.
Ghatak, Sambuddha, Aaron Gold, and Brandon C. Prins. (2017) Domestic Terrorism in Democratic States: Understanding and Addressing Minority Grievances. Journal of Conflict Resolution 63(2): 439–467.
Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Sara M. Polo. (2016) Ethnic inclusion, democracy, and terrorism. Public Choice 169 (3–4): 207–229.
Goldstein, Kevin B. (2005) Unemployment, inequality and terrorism: Another look at the relationship between economics and terrorism. Undergraduate Economic Review 1(6): 1–21.
Goldstone, Jack, Robert Bates, Daniel Epstein, Tedd R. Gurr, Michael Lustik, Monty G. Marshall, Jay Ulfelder, and Mark Woodward. (2010) A global model for forecasting political instability. American Journal of Political Science 54(1): 190–208.
Gurr, Ted R. (1974) Persistence and change in political systems, 1800–1971. American Political Science Review 68(4): 1482–1504.
Hoffman, Bruce (2006) Inside terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Jahan, Selim, ed. (2016) Human Development Report 2016. Human Development for Everyone. New York, NY: UN Development Program.
Kibris, Arzu. (2011) Funerals and elections: The effects of terrorism on voting behavior in Turkey. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55(2): 220–247.
Kis-Katos, Krisztina, Helge Liebert, and Günther G. Schulze. (2011) On the origin of domestic and international terrorism. European Journal of Political Economy 27: S17–S36.
Koch, Michael T., and Skyler Cranmer. (2007) Testing the “Dick Cheney” hypothesis: do governments of the left attract more terrorism than governments of the right? Conflict Management and Peace Science 24(4): 311–326.
Korotayev, Andrey, Ilya Vaskin, Stanislav Bilyuga, and Ilya Ilyin. (2018) Economic Development and Sociopolitical Destabilization: A Re-Analysis. Cliodynamics 9(1): 59–118. doi:10.21237/c7clio9137314.
Korotayev, Andrey, Ilya Vaskin, and Sergey Tsirel. (2021) Economic Growth, Education, and Terrorism: A Re-Analysis. Terrorism and Political Violence 33(3): 572–595. doi:10.1080/09546553.2018.1559835.
Korotayev, Andrey, Leonid Issaev, and Julia Zinkina. (2015) Center-Periphery Dissonance as a Possible Factor of the Revolutionary Wave of 2013–2014: A cross-national analysis. Cross-Cultural Research 49(5): 461–488.
Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter, Mogens K. Justesen, and Robert Klemmensen. (2006) The political economy of freedom, democracy and transnational terrorism. Public Choice 128(1–2): 289–315.
Lee, Chia-yi. (2013) Democracy, civil liberties, and hostage-taking terrorism. Journal of Peace Research 50(2): 235–248.
Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A. Way. (2010) Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, Quan. (2005) Does democracy promote or reduce transnational terrorist incidents? Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(2): 278–297.
Lutz, James M., and Brenda J. Lutz. (2010) Democracy and terrorism. Perspectives on Terrorism 4(1): 63–74.
Mansfield, Edward D., and Jack Snyder. (1995) Democratization and the Danger of War. International Security 20(1): 5–38.
Marshall, Monty G., and Benjamin R. Cole. (2012) Societal systems analysis and the problem of factionalism in emerging democracies. Paper presented at the Meeting of the International Studies and British International Studies Associations, Edinburgh.
Marshall, Monty G., Tedd Gurr, and Keith Jaggers. (2016) Polity IV project. Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2015. Dataset users’ manual. Available at: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2016.pdf (accessed 09 September 2019).
Merolla, Jennifer L., and Elizabeth J. Zechmeister. (2009) Democracy at risk: How terrorist threats affect the public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moore, Will, Ryan Bakker, and Daniel Hill. (2011) How much terror? Dissidents, governments, institutions and the cross-national study of terror attacks. Journal of Peace Research 53(5): 711–726.
Muller, Edward N., and Erich Weede. (1990) Cross-national variation in political violence: A rational action approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution 34(4): 624–651.
Narochnitskaya, Ekaterina. (2003) Terrorizm i demokratiya (na primere etnicheskogo terrorizma v stranakh Zapada) [Terrorism and democracy (on the example of ethnic terrorism in Western countries)]. Aktualnye Problemy Evropy (1): 27–59.
Pape, Robert A. (2003) The strategic logic of suicide terrorism, American Political Science Review 97(3): 343–361.
Piazza, James A. (2006) Rooted in poverty?: Terrorism, poor economic development, and social cleavages. Terrorism and Political Violence 18(1): 159–177.
Piazza, James A. (2008) Do democracy and free markets protect us from terrorism? International Politics 45(1): 72–91.
Piazza, James A. (2013) Regime age and terrorism: Are new democracies prone to terrorism? International Interactions 39(2): 246–263.
Piazza, James A. (2017) Repression and terrorism: A cross-national empirical analysis of types of repression and domestic terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 29(1): 102–118.
Robertson, Graeme B., and Emmanuel Teitelbaum. (2011) Foreign direct investment, regime type, and labor protest in developing countries. American Journal of Political Science 55(3): 665–677.
Sandler, Todd. (1995) On the relationship between democracy and terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 7(4): 1–9.
Savun, Burcu, and Brian J. Phillips. (2009) Democracy, foreign policy, and terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53(6): 878–904.
Shahrouri, Nahla. (2010) Does a link exist between democracy and terrorism? International Journal on World Peace 27(4): 41–77.
Slinko, Elena, Stanislav Bilyuga, Julia Zinkina, and Andrey Korotayev. (2017) Regime type and political destabilization in cross-national perspective: A re-analysis. Cross-Cultural Research 51(1): 26–50.
START [National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism]. (2019) ‘Global Terrorism Database’. Available at: http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/ (accessed 08 October 2019).
Tavares, Jose. (2004) The open society assesses its enemies: shocks, disasters and terrorist attacks, Journal of Monetary Economics 51(5): 1039–1070.
Ulfelder, Jay, and Michael Lustik. (2007) Modelling Transitions to and from Democracy. Democratization 14(3): 351–387.
United Nations Development Program. (2019) Human Development Data. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/ (accessed June 20, 2019).
United Nations Population Division. (2019) World Population Prospects Database. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/ (accessed 18 June 2019).
Vaskin, Ilya, Sergey Tsirel, and Аndrey Korotayev. (2018) Economic growth, education and terrorism: experience in quantitative analysis. Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal 24(2): 28–65.
Viscusi, Kip W., and Richard J. Zeckhauser. (2003) Sacrificing civil liberties to reduce terrorism risks. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 26(2–3): 99–120.
Wade, Sara Jackson, and Dan Reiter. (2007) Does democracy matter? Regime type and suicide terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51(2): 329–348.
World Bank. (2019a) GDP per capita, PPP (constant 2011 international $). World Development Indicators Online. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD (accessed 10 October 2019).
World Bank. (2019b) Unemployment, total (% of total labor force). World Development Indicators Online. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/sl.uem.totl.zs (accessed 09 October 2019).
Young, Joseph K., and Laura Dugan. (2011) Veto players and terror. Journal of Peace Research 48(1): 9–33.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 902 | 327 | 28 |
Full Text Views | 138 | 41 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 284 | 91 | 7 |
This article proposes a new explanation of the positive correlation between democracy and terrorism detected in many previous studies. It is shown that this might be accounted for by the fact that factional democracies are subjected to more terrorist attacks than the other political regimes. A positive relationship between the democratic regime and the level of terrorist activity can be obtained due to the inclusion of factional democracies in the sample of democratic states. If factional democracies are excluded from the sample, the relationship between the level of terrorist activity and the democratic regime is negative. The analysis allows to maintain that factional democracy is a rather powerful factor of a high level of terrorist activity, while non-factional democracy turns out to be rather a statistically significant predictor of a relatively low intensity of terrorist attacks.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 902 | 327 | 28 |
Full Text Views | 138 | 41 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 284 | 91 | 7 |