Statistical Innovation in the Global South
Mechanisms of Translation in Censuses of Brazil, Ecuador, Ghana and Sierra Leone
In: Comparative SociologySearch for other papers by Byron Villacis in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Alena Thiel in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Daniel Capistrano in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Christyne Carvalho da Silva in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article proposes a comparative socio-economic history of quantification in Ecuador, Brazil, Ghana and Sierra Leone. It narrows in on censuses in the Global South as sites of methodological and infrastructural innovation in the context of global circulations of model population data systems, methodological standards, and material infrastructures. Specifically, the authors ask which arrangements of actors, norms and settings are involved in the reception, translation and adaptation of statistical innovation and how uneven relations and compositions of power between and within these fields shape the process of transmission. Distilling from their explorative, hermeneutic approach, the authors explore the mechanisms that link variously positioned political fields (Bourdieu, 1985) in the production and implementation of statistical innovation in the Global South. Four mechanisms are identified that shape statistical innovation as process of reception of globally circulating models and ideas as well as their adaptations into specific fields, all of which have differentiated effects and play under certain conditions in parallel or combined ways: 1) interventionist impulses from international organizations, 2) commercial and institutional brokerage, 3) initiatives from local professional communities, and 4) effects of political instabilities.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Acemoglu, Daron, Tristan Reed, And James Robinson. 2014. “Chiefs: Economic Development and Elite Control of Civil Society in Sierra Leone.” Journal of Political Economy 122 (2): 319–368.
-
Almeida, Rebeca. 1994. Kemmerer En Ecuador. Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales: Primera Edición.
-
Amrute, Sareeta. 2019. “Of Techno-Ethics and Techno-Affects.” Feminist Review 123 (1): 56–73.
-
Anderson, Margo and Stephen Fienberg 2000. Who Counts?: The Politics of Census- Taking in Contemporary America.
-
Baffour, Bernard, Thomas King, And Paolo Valente. 2013. “The Modern Census: Evolution, Examples and Evaluation.” International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 81 (3):407–425.
-
Bartl, Walter, Christian Papilloud, And Audrey Terracher-Lipinki. 2019. “Governing by Numbers – Key Indicators and the Politics of Expectations. An Introduction.” Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 44 (2): 7–43.
-
Becker, Marc. 2021. The CIA in Ecuador. Durham: Duke University Press.
-
Beidou, Abdoullahi. 2021. “Disclosable Version of the ISR – Harmonizing and Improving Statistics in West Africa – P169265 – Sequence No: 02.” World Bank Group.
-
Besaçon, Marie. 2003. “Good Governance Rankings: The Art of Measurement.” Cambridge, MA: World Peace Foundation.
-
Bigo, Didier, Engin Isin, And Evelyn Ruppert. 2019. Data politics: worlds, subjects, rights. London, New York: Routledge.
-
Birhane, Abeba. 2020. “Algorithmic Colonization of Africa.” SCRIPTed. A Journal of Law, Technology & Society 17 (2): 389–409.
-
Borja, Rodrigo. 1985. “Ecuador: Lecciones de Un Proceso Político.” Nueva Sociedad (78): 8–12.
-
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2002. “The Social Conditions of the International Circulation of Ideas.” Actes de La Recherche En Sciences Sociales 145(5):3–8.
-
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2002. “The Social Conditions of the International Circulation of Ideas.” Actes de La Recherche En Sciences Sociales 145(5):3–8.
-
Breckenridge, Keith. 2014. Biometric State: The Global Politics of Identification and Surveillance in South Africa, 1850 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Bruns, Barbara, David Evans, And Javier Luque. 2011. Achieving World-Class Education in Brazil. Washington: The World Bank.
-
Bustamante, J., Giraudo, L., & Mayer, L. (2014). La novedad estadística. Cuantificar, cualificar y transformar las poblaciones en Europa y América Latina, siglos XIX y XX. Madrid: Ediciones Polifemo.
-
Cakici, Baki, Evelyn Ruppert, And Stephan Scheel. 2020. “Peopling Europe through Data Practices: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 45(2): 199–211.
-
Collins, Jennifer. 2008. “Rafael Correa and the Struggle for a New Ecuador.” Global Dialogue 10: 37.
-
Conrad, Fred, And Mick Couper. 2004. “Usability, Comparability, and Data Quality across Modes and Technologies in Census Data Collection.” Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, June 22. Accessed May 10, 2022, http://websm.org/uploadi/editor/1140639131Conrad_Couper_3_31_04.pdf/.
-
Damásio, Leandro. 2011. Desenvolvimento Institucional do INEP: conjuntura crítica e trajetória. PhD thesis. Fundação Getúlio Vargas.
-
De Graft-Johnson, J. C., 1969. “The Population of Ghana 1846–1967: A Digest and Discussion of the Data in the Official Counts and Censuses.” Transactions of the Historical Society of Ghana 10: 1–12.
-
De La Torre, Carlos. 2008. “Protesta y Democracia En Ecuador: La Caída de Lucio Gutiérrez.” Luchas Contrahegemónicas y Cambios Políticos Recientes de América Latina: 197–227.
-
De La Torre, Carlos. 2008. “Protesta y Democracia En Ecuador: La Caída de Lucio Gutiérrez.” Luchas Contrahegemónicas y Cambios Políticos Recientes de América Latina 197–227.
-
Desrosières, Alain. 2010 [1993]. La politique des grands nombres, Histoire de la raison statistique. Paris: La Découverte.
-
Drake, Paul. 1984. “La Misión Kemmerer En El Ecuador: Revolución y Regionalismo.” Cultura, Revista Del Banco Central Del Ecuador 7 (19): 211–276.
-
Echeverry Hernández, Ariel Augusto. 2011. “Análisis de La Migración Venezolana a Colombia Durante El Gobierno de Hugo Chávez (1999–2011). Identificación de Capital Social y Compensación Económica.” Revista Análisis Internacional 4: 11–32.
-
El Telegrafo. 2016. “Entre 1999 y 2007, Más de 950 Mil Ecuatorianos Migraron.” Diario El Telegrafo, June 2.
-
Etan, A., & Himelein, K. (2020). Monitoring the Ebola crisis using mobile phone surveys. In Data collection in fragile states. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham: 15–31.
-
Fourcade, Marion, Brian Lande, And Evan Schofer. 2016. “Political space and the space of polities: Doing politics across nations.” Poetics 55: 1–18.
-
Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Fourcade, Marion. 2017. “State Metrology: The Rating of Sovereigns and the Judgment of Nations.” In The Many Hands of the State, edited by K. J. Morgan and A. S. Orloff, 103–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Gaisie, S. K. ca. 1969. “Dynamics of Population Growth in Ghana.” Ghana Population Studies No 1. Accra: Demographic Unit.
-
Germain, Randall. 1997. The International Organization of Credit: States and Global Finance in the World-Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Gil, Natália De Lacerda. 2019. “Estatísticas e Educação: considerações sobre a necessidade de um olhar atento.” Pensar a Educação 5 (2): 1–29.
-
Government of Sierra Leone. 1986. The Preliminary Report on the 1985 National Population Census of Sierra Leone. Accessed May 10, 2022, https://www.africabib.org/rec.php?RID=W00095173&DB=w/.
-
Government of Sierra Leone. 2018. Report of the Governance Transition Team 2018. Accessed May 10, 2022, http://www.sierra-leone.org/Docs/GTT_Report.pdf/.
-
GSS [Ghana Statistical Service]. 1987. 1984 Population Census of Ghana. Demographic and Economic Characteristics. Total Country. Accra: Ghana Statistical Service.
-
GSS [Ghana Statistical Service]. 2020. Ghana Statistical Service Corporate Plan 2020–2024. Accra: Ghana Statistical Service.
-
Guilhot, Nicolas. 2005. The Democracy Makers: Human Rights and International Order. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Hakim, Catherine. 1980. “Census Reports as Documentary Evidence: The Census Commentaries 1801–1951.” The Sociological Review 28 (3):551–580.
-
IASI. 1948. “The 1950 Census of the Americas.” Population Index 14 (1): 20–22.
-
ICT4D. 2003. Ghana Integrated ICT for Accelerated Development (ICT4AD) Policy. Accessed May 10, 2022, https://www.moc.gov.gh/ghana-integrated-ict-accelerated-development-ict4ad-policy/.
-
INEC. 2015. Una Mirada Histórica a La Estadística Del Ecuador. Vol. First. Quito.
-
Ittman, Karl, Dennis Cordell, And Gregory Maddox. 2010. The demographics of empire: the colonial order and the creation of knowledge. Athens: Ohio University Press.
-
Jerven, Morten. 2017. “How much will a Data Revolution in Development Cost?” Forum for Development Studies 44 (1): 31–50.
-
Karkazis, Katrina, and Rebecca Jordan-Young. 2020. “Sensing Race as a Ghost Variable in Science, Technology, and Medicine.” Science, Technology, & Human Values. 45 (5): 763–778.
-
Keeper, Alice. 1982. “Statistical Activities of the Organization of American States and the Inter-American Statistical Institute.” Government Publications Review 9 (3):195–203.
-
Koster, Martijn, and Yves Van Der Leynseele. 2018. “Brokers as Assemblers: Studying Development Through the Lens of Brokerage.” Ethnos 83 (5): 803–813.
-
La Hora, Diario. 2000. “INEC sin director – La Hora.” La Hora Noticias de Ecuador, sus provincias y el mundo, May 5.
-
Lam, David. 2011. “How the World Survived the Population Bomb: Lessons from 50 Years of Extraordinary Demographic History.” Demography 48 (4):1231–1262.
-
Leszczynski, Agnieszka. 2020. “Digital methods III: The digital mundane.” Progress in Human Geography 44 (6): 1194–1201.
-
Loukissas, Yanni. 2019. All data are local: thinking critically in a data-driven society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
Loveman, Mara. 2013. “Census Taking and Nation Making in Nineteenth-Century Latin America.” In State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain, edited by M. A. Centeno and A. E. Ferraro, 329–355. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Loveman, Mara. 2014. National Colors: Racial Classification and the State in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Madianou, Mirca. 2019. “Technocolonialism: Digital Innovation and Data Practices in the Humanitarian Response to Refugee Crises.” Social Media + Society 5 (3): 1–13.
-
Merry, Sally Engle. 2011. “Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance.” Current Anthropology 52 (S3): S83–95.
-
Merry, Sally Engle. 2016. The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Minteguiaga, Analía. 2012. “Política y Políticas Sociales En El Ecuador Reciente: Dificultades Asociadas a La Salida Del Ciclo Neoliberal.” Revista de CienciasSociales 1 (135–136): 45–58.
-
Onsembe, Jason, and James Ntozi. 2009. “The 2000 Round of Censuses in Africa: Achievements and Challenges.” African Statistical Journal 3: 11–28.
-
Pelizza, Annalisa. 2021. “Identification as translation: The art of choosing the right spokespersons at the securitized border.” Social Studies of Science 51 (4): 487–511.
-
Porter, Theodore. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton University Press.
-
Ratner, Helene, and Evelyn Ruppert. 2019. “Producing and projecting data: Aesthetic practices of government data portals.” Big Data & Society 6 (2): 1–16.
-
Restrepo, Eduardo, and Axel Rojas. 2010. Inflexión decolonial: fuentes, conceptos y cuestionamientos. Colombia: Editorial Universidad del Cauca.
-
Rosa Becker, Fernanda, and Luiz Claudio Costa. 2013. “Brazil: Shift of Accountability Incentives.” In Education Policy Reform Trends in G20 Members, edited by Yan Wang, 173–188. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
-
Ruiz, Magda, Magda. 2016. “Estado de Avance de Los Censos de 2020 e Identificación de Las Necesidades Nacionales.” Foz de Iguazu: OLAC.
-
Sankoh, Osman. 2020. Mid-Term Population and Housing Census discussion on Society for Radio Democracy 98.1 [Video]. Youtube, November 17. Accessed May 10, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq_k26I5Kxg/.
-
Sarmiento, Manuel. 2016. “El Retorno Democrático Ecuatoriano y El Mito de Una Sociedad Sin Conflicto: Los Modos de Representación de La Muerte de Jaime Roldós.” FLACSO, Quito-Ecuador.
-
Scheffer, Thomas, and Jörg Niewöhner. 2010. “Thickening Comparison. On the Multiple Facets of Comparability.” In Thick Comparison: Reviving the Ethnographic Aspiration, edited by Thomas Scheffer and Jörg Niewöhner, 1–15. Leiden: Brill.
-
Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian, And Stefan Bernhard. 2020. Charting transnational fields: Methodology for a political sociology of knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Serra, Gerardo. 2018. ‘“Hail the Census Night”: Trust and Political Imagination in the 1960 Population Census of Ghana.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 60 (3): 659–687.
-
Silva, Gabriela Toledo. 2019. “International Cooperation from the Perspective of INEP Agents: The OECD and Brazilian Public Education, 1996–2006.” In The OECD’s Historical Rise in Education. The Formation of a Global Governing Complex, edited by Christian Ydesen, 109–131. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Statistics Sierra Leone. 2006. Executive Summary of the 2004 Population and Housing Census.
-
Statistics Sierra Leone. 2017. National Analytical Report of the 2015 Sierra Leone Population and Housing Census.
-
Szreter, Simon, and Keith Breckenridge. 2012. “Recognition and Registration: The Infrastructure of Personhood in World History.” Proceedings of the British Academy 182: 1–36.
-
Takala, Tuomas, Johanna Kallo, Jaakko Kauko, and Risto Rinne. 2018. “One Size for All? Policy Advice of the World Bank and the OECD on Quality Assurance and Evaluation of School Education in Russia, Brazil, and China.” In Cross-nationally Comparative, Evidence-based Educational Policymaking and Reform, edited by A. W. Wiseman and P. M. Davidson, 301–319. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
-
Thiel, Alena. 2020. “Biometric identification technologies and the Ghanaian “data revolution”.’ The Journal of Modern African Studies 58 (1): 115–136.
-
Thiel, Alena. 2021.”Ghana upgraded its census to make it more inclusive: but old tensions still surfaced.” The Conversation, July 22. Accessed May 10, 2022, https://theconversation.com/ghana-upgraded-its-census-to-make-it-more-inclusive-but-old-tensions-still-surfaced-164654/.
-
Thiel, Alena. 2022. “Une histoire politique du recensement au Ghana aux 20e et 21e siècles.” Statistique et Société 10 (1): 59–78.
-
UN. 2017. Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses, Revision 3.
-
Valdivia, Cecilia. 2014. “Historia de Los Censos.” Ágora Estadística, June 26. Accessed May 10. 2022, http://agoraestadistica.blogspot.com/2014/06/historia-de-los-censos.html/.
-
Valle, Catalina. 2015. Reseña Histórica Cartográfica En El Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. Quito-Ecuador: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos.
-
Van der Veer, Peter. 2016. The Value of Comparison. Durham, London: Duke University Press.
-
Vasquez, Jorge Daniel. 2018. “Sobre La Cuestión de La Memoria En Ecuador. La Muerte de Jaime Roldós Ante La Perversión Historiográfica.” Fuera de Campo 2 (1): 88–103.
-
Ventresca, Marc. 2002. “Global policy fields: Conflicts and settlements in the emergence of organized inter-national attention to official statistics, 1853–1947.” Institute for Policy Research Working Papers No 02 (45). Accessed May 10, 2022, https://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/documents/working-papers/2002/IPR-WP-02–45.pdf/.
-
Villacis, Byron, and Debora Thome. 2020. “Gender Politics in Latin American Censuses: The Case of Brazil and Ecuador.” In Gender and Practice: Knowledge, Policy, Organizations, edited by Marcia Texler Segal, Kristy Kelly and Vasilikie Demos, 119–140. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
-
Villani, Marialuisa, and Dalila Oliveira. 2018. “Avaliação Nacional e Internacional no Brasil: os vínculos entre o PISA e o IDEB.” Educação & Realidade 43: 1343–1362.
-
Von Oertzen, Christine. 2017. “Die Historizität der Verdatung. Konzepte, Werkzeuge und Praktiken im 19. Jahrhundert.” NTM Journal of the History of Science, Technology and Medicine 25: 407–434.
-
Weitzberg, Keren. 2020. “Biometrics, Race Making, and White Exceptionalism: The Controversy Over Universal Fingerprinting in Post-World War II Kenya.” The Journal of African History 61 (1): 23–43.
-
Winkle, Kenneth, and Margo Anderson. 1989. “The Census and Society.” Reviews in American History 17 (3): 341–345.
-
Zewoldi, Yacob. 2019. “Snapshot of civil registration and vital statistics systems of Sierra Leone.” International Development Research Centre. Accessed May 10, 2022, https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/handle/10625/60285/.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 538 | 269 | 24 |
| Full Text Views | 24 | 17 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 54 | 43 | 0 |
Statistical Innovation in the Global South
Mechanisms of Translation in Censuses of Brazil, Ecuador, Ghana and Sierra Leone
In: Comparative SociologySearch for other papers by Byron Villacis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alena Thiel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daniel Capistrano in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christyne Carvalho da Silva in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article proposes a comparative socio-economic history of quantification in Ecuador, Brazil, Ghana and Sierra Leone. It narrows in on censuses in the Global South as sites of methodological and infrastructural innovation in the context of global circulations of model population data systems, methodological standards, and material infrastructures. Specifically, the authors ask which arrangements of actors, norms and settings are involved in the reception, translation and adaptation of statistical innovation and how uneven relations and compositions of power between and within these fields shape the process of transmission. Distilling from their explorative, hermeneutic approach, the authors explore the mechanisms that link variously positioned political fields (Bourdieu, 1985) in the production and implementation of statistical innovation in the Global South. Four mechanisms are identified that shape statistical innovation as process of reception of globally circulating models and ideas as well as their adaptations into specific fields, all of which have differentiated effects and play under certain conditions in parallel or combined ways: 1) interventionist impulses from international organizations, 2) commercial and institutional brokerage, 3) initiatives from local professional communities, and 4) effects of political instabilities.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 538 | 269 | 24 |
| Full Text Views | 24 | 17 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 54 | 43 | 0 |