Save

Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets

In: Comparative Sociology
Authors:
Carsten Q. Schneider Department of Political Science and Center for the Study of Imperfections in Democracies, Central European University Nador utca 9, 1051 Budapest, Hungary, Email: schneiderc@ceu.hu

Search for other papers by Carsten Q. Schneider in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Claudius Wagemann Istituto italiano di scienze umane Palazzo Strozzi, Piazza degli Strozzi, 50123 Florence, Italy, Email: claudius.wagemann@sumitalia.it

Search for other papers by Claudius Wagemann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

As a relatively new methodological tool, QCA is still a work in progress. Standards of good practice are needed in order to enhance the quality of its applications. We present a list from A to Z of twenty-six proposals regarding what a “good” QCA-based research entails, both with regard to QCA as a research approach and as an analytical technique. Our suggestions are subdivided into three categories: criteria referring to the research stages before, during, and after the analytical moment of data analysis. This listing can be read as a guideline for authors, reviewers, and readers of QCA.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 16489 3513 255
Full Text Views 2306 246 24
PDF Views & Downloads 3314 729 143