This article attempts to engage the burgeoning research on the transnational dimensions of populism with recent theorization on legitimation strategies in international politics. Focusing on the performative practices of the wave of Pink Tide neo-populist leaders in Latin America (also called “Chavista” or “Bolivarian”), this work identifies three main strategies of legitimation – affective, normative, and institutional – and tracks their transnational resonance. Indications of these strategies include the extrapolation of strong emotional attachments with supporters abroad, the empowerment of identity-based solidarities, and the reconstruction of regionalist projects. Their drive to mobilize transnational support has been complemented by a normative flipside – the discursive attack on rival “anti-national” elites and the readiness to use national revenues for demonstrating solidarity with international allies. Analysis details how these strategies projected the populists’ legitimacy onto the regional and global arena. This inquiry may contribute policy-oriented hindsight on the rise of populists worldwide and their potential effects on transnational practices of cooperation and defiance, primarily on regional integration, global governance, and international conflicts.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Åhäll, L. (2018). Affect as methodology: Feminism and the politics of emotion. International Political Sociology, 12(1), pp. 36–52.
Albertazzi, D. & McDonnell, D., eds. (2008). Twenty-first Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Altinors, G. (2021). Rethinking Populism Geopolitically: Authoritarian Populism and Migration Politics in Britain and Turkey. BSEU-Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 6(2), pp. 297–308.
Altman-Borbón, J. (2015). alba: Ideology Overcomes Integration? In B. Bagley & M. Defort, eds., Decline of the US Hegemony? A Challenge of ALBA and a New Latin American Integration of the Twenty-First Century. Lexington Books, pp. 67–96.
Azicri, M. (2009). The Castro-Chávez Alliance. Latin American Perspectives 36(1), pp. 99–110.
Bagley, B.M. & Defort, M., eds. (2015). Decline of the US Hegemony?: A Challenge of ALBA and a New Latin American Integration of the Twenty-First Century. Lexington Books.
Beetham, D. (1991). The Legitimation of Power. Macmillan.
Bonansinga, D. (2022). “A threat to us”: The interplay of insecurity and enmity narratives in left-wing populism. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 24(3), pp. 511–25.
Boucher, J.C. & Thies, C.G. (2019). “I Am a Tariff Man”: The Power of Populist Foreign Policy Rhetoric under President Trump. The Journal of Politics 81(2), pp. 712–22.
Capriles, C. (2006). La enciclopedia del chavismo o hacia una teología del populismo. Revista Venezolana de Ciencia Política 29, pp. 73–92.
Casarões, G.S.P.E. & Barros Leal Farias, D. (2021). Brazilian foreign policy under Jair Bolsonaro: far-right populism and the rejection of the liberal international order. Cambridge Review of International Affairs (forthcoming), pp. 1–21.
Chryssogelos, A. (2018). State transformation and populism: From the internationalized to the neo- sovereign state? Politics 40(1), pp. 22–37.
Chryssogelos, A. (2021). The dog that barked but did not bite: Greek foreign policy under the populist coalition of syriza-Independent Greeks, 2015–2019. Comparative European Politics 19(6) pp. 722–38.
Clark, I. (2005). Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford University Press.
Colalongo, R. & Donato, S. (2021). Populist left-wing foreign policy: The case of Kirchnerism in Argentina. Cultura Latinoamericana 34(2), pp. 24–47.
Coleman, K.P. (2007). International Organisations and Peace Enforcement: The Politics of International Legitimacy. Cambridge University Press.
Conniff, M.L. (1982). Latin American Populism in Comparative Perspective. University of New Mexico Press.
Corrales, J. (2009). Using social power to balance soft power: Venezuela’s foreign policy. The Washington Quarterly 32(4), pp. 97–114.
De Cleen, B., Moffitt, B., Panayotu, P., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2020). The potentials and difficulties of transnational populism: The case of the democracy in Europe movement 2025 (DiEM25). Political Studies 68(1), pp. 146–66.
De la Torre, C. (2007). The resurgence of radical populism in Latin America. Constellations 14(3), pp. 384–97.
De la Torre, C. (2010). Populist Seduction in Latin America. Ohio University Press.
De la Torre, C. (2017a). Hugo Chávez and the diffusion of Bolivarianism. Democratization 24(7), pp. 1271–88.
De la Torre, C. (2017b). A Populist International?: alba’s Democratic and Autocratic Promotion. SAIS Review of International Affairs 37(1), pp. 83–93.
De la Torre, C., ed. (2019). Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. Routledge.
De Sá Guimarães, F., De Oliveira E., & Silva, I.D. (2021). Far-right populism and foreign policy identity: Jair Bolsonaro’s ultra-conservatism and the new politics of alignment. International Affairs 97(2), pp. 345–63.
Defort, M. (2015). Neo-Bolivarian Challenges: Cuba and Venezuela and Their Foreign Policies. In B. Bagley & M. Defort, eds., Decline of the US Hegemony? A Challenge of ALBA and a New Latin American Integration of the Twenty-First Century. Lexington Books, pp. 97–110.
Defort, M. (2015). Military Geometry of alba: Venezuela’s Armed Forces, Terrorism, and Revolutionary Islam. In B. Bagley and Defort, eds., Decline of the US Hegemony? A Challenge of ALBA and a New Latin American Integration of the Twenty-First Century. Lexington Books, pp. 185–202.
Destradi, S. & Plagemann, J. (2019). Populism and International Relations: (Un)predictability, personalisation, and the reinforcement of existing trends in world politics. Review of International Studies 45(5), pp. 711–30.
Destradi, S., Cadier, D., & Plagemann, J. (2021). Populism and foreign policy: a research agenda (Introduction). Comparative European Politics 19(6), pp. 663–82.
Dodson, M. & Dorraj, M. (2008). Populism and foreign policy in Venezuela and Iran. Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy & International Relations 9, pp. 71–88.
Drezner, D.W. (2017). The Angry Populist as Foreign Policy Leader: Real Change or Just Hot Air. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 41, p. 23.
Ellner, S. (2004). Hugo Chávez y Alberto Fujimori: Análisis comparativo de dos variantes de populismo. Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales 10(1), pp. 13–37.
Ellner, S. (2012). The distinguishing features of Latin America’s new left in power: The Chávez, Morales, and Correa governments. Latin American Perspectives 39(1), pp. 96–114.
Filc, D. (2015). Latin American inclusive and European exclusionary populism: colonialism as an explanation. Journal of Political Ideologies 20(3), pp. 263–83.
Franck, T.M. (1990). The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. Oxford University Press.
Gardini, G.L. & Lambert, P. (2011). Latin American Foreign Policies: Between Ideology and Pragmatism. Springer.
Gilley, B. (2009). The Right to Rule: How States Win and Lose Legitimacy. Columbia University Press.
Goddard, S.E. (2009). Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy: Jerusalem and Northern Ireland. Cambridge University Press.
Goddard, S.E. & Krebs, R. (2015). Rhetoric, legitimation, and grand strategy. Security Studies 24(1), pp. 5–36.
Gronau, J. & Schmidtke, H. (2016). The quest for legitimacy in world politics–international institutions’ legitimation strategies. Review of International Studies 42(3), pp. 535–57.
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2017). Global Populisms and Their Impact. Slavic Review 76(S1), pp. S3–S8.
Hadiz, V.R. & Chryssogelos, A. (2017). Populism in world politics: A comparative cross-regional perspective. International Political Science Review 38(4), pp. 399–411.
Haftel, Y.Z. & Lenz, T. (2021). Measuring institutional overlap in global governance. Review of International Organizations, pp. 1–25.
Haftel, Y.Z., Wajner, D.F., & Eran, D. (2020). The short and long (er) of it: The effect of hard times on regional institutionalization. International Studies Quarterly 64(4), pp. 808–20.
Hall, T. (2018). Emotional Diplomacy: Official Emotion on the International Stage. Cornell University Press.
Hawkins, K. (2003). Populism in Venezuela: the rise of Chavismo. Third World Quarterly 24(6), pp. 1137–60.
Hawkins, K. (2009). Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies 42(8), pp. 1040–67.
Hawkins, K.A., Aguilar, R., Castanho Silva, B., Jenne, E. K., Kocijan, B. & Rovira-Kaltwasser, C. (2019). Measuring populist discourse: The global populism database [Dataset]. Team Populism. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LFTQEZ (accessed 18 December 2021).
Hawkins, K.A., Carlin, R.E., Littvay, L., & Kaltwasser, C.R., eds. (2018). The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis. Routledge.
Hellinger, D. (2006). Tercermundismo and Chavismo. Stockholm Review of Latin American Studies 1, pp. 4–17.
Hughes, T. (1975). Liberals, Populists, and Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy 20, pp. 98–137.
Hurd, I. (2008). After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton University Press.
Hurrelmann, A., Schneider, S. & Steffek, J. (2007). Legitimacy in An Age of Global Politics. Palgrave.
Inglehart, R.F. & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. Harvard Papers.
Kacowicz, A.M., Lacovsky, E., Sasson, K., & Wajner, D.F. (2021). The Unintended Consequences of Peace: Peaceful Borders and Illicit Transnational Flows. Cambridge University Press.
Krebs, R.R. (2021). Pluralism, Populism, and the Impossibility of Grand Strategy. In T. Balzacq & R.R. Krebs, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Grand Strategy. Oxford University Press, pp. 673–89.
Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.
Lake, D.A. (2018). International legitimacy lost? Rule and resistance when America is first. Perspectives on Politics 16(1), pp. 6–21.
Legler, T. & Nolte, D. (2019). Venezuela: la protección regional multilateral. Foreign Affairs Latinoamérica 19(2), pp. 43–51.
Levitsky, S. & Loxton, J. (2013). Populism and competitive authoritarianism in the Andes. Democratization 20(1), pp. 107–36.
Levitsky, S. & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. Broadway Books.
Liang, C.S. (2016). Europe for the Europeans: The Foreign Policy of the Populist Radical Right. Routledge.
Löfflmann, G. (2019). America First and the Populist Impact on US Foreign Policy. Survival 61(6), pp. 115–38.
Mace, G. (2020). Input legitimation dynamics in regional organizations: Mercosur and civil society. International Politics (forthcoming), pp. 1–19.
Madrid, R.L. (2008). The rise of ethnopopulism in Latin America. World Politics 60(3), pp. 475–508.
Malamud, A. (2011). Argentine foreign policy under the Kirchners: ideological, pragmatic, or simply peronist? In G.L. Gardini & P. Lambert, eds., Latin American Foreign Policies: Between Ideology and Pragmatism. Springer, pp. 87–102.
Malamud, A. (2019). Overlapping regionalism, no integration: conceptual issues and the Latin American experiences. Politica Internacional, pp. 46–59.
Manfredi, L.J., Amado, A., & Gómez-Iniesta, P. (2022). State disinformation: emotions at the service of the cause. Communication & Society, 35(2).
Mead, W.R. (2011). The Tea Party and American foreign policy: What populism means for globalism. Foreign Affairs 90(2), pp. 28–44.
Millard, P., Hoffman, C., Gertz, M., & Lin, J.C.F. (2019). A Timeline of Venezuela’s Economic Rise and Fall. In https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-venezuela-key-events/ (updated April 30).
Moffitt, B. (2016). The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford University Press.
Mudde, C. & Rovira-Kaltwasser, C. (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? Cambridge University Press.
Mudde, C. & Rovira-Kaltwasser, C. (2018). Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies 51(13), pp. 1667–93.
Mulligan, S. (2007). Legitimacy and the practice of political judgement. In A. Hurrelmann, S. Schneider, & J. Steffek, eds., Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 75–89.
Oxhorn, P. (1998). The social foundations of Latin America’s recurrent populism. Journal of Historical Sociology 11(2), pp. 212–46.
Panizza, F. (2005). Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. Verso.
Plagemann, J. & Destradi, S. (2018). Populism and Foreign Policy: The Case of India. Foreign Policy Analysis 15(2), pp. 283–301.
Reus-Smit, C. (2007). International crises of legitimacy. International Politics 44(2–3), pp. 157–74.
Riggirozzi, P. Tussie D., eds. (2012). The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism: The Case of Latin America. Springer.
Roberts, K.M. (2003). Social correlates of party system demise and populist resurgence in Venezuela. Latin American politics and society, 45(3), 35–57.
Roberts, K.M. (2006). Populism, political conflict, and grassroots organization in Latin America. Comparative Politics 38(2), pp. 127–48.
Roberts, K.M. (2014). Populism, political mobilizations, and crises of political representation. In C. de la Torre, ed., The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives. University Press of Kentucky, pp. 140–58.
Roniger, L. (2012). Favors, “Merit Ribbons,” and Services: Analyzing the Fragile Resilience of Clientelism. In T. Hilgers, ed., Clientelism in Everyday Latin American Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 25–40.
Roniger, L. (2013). Modern Populism in Latin America. In B. Vinson, ed., Oxford Bibliographies Online. Oxford University Press, http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199766581/obo-9780199766581-0130.xml.
Roniger, L. (2022). Transnational Perspectives on Latin America: The Entwined Histories of a Multi-state Region. Oxford University Press.
Roniger, L. & Senkman, L. (2022). Conspiracy Theories and Latin American History. Lurking in the Shadows. Routledge.
Rovira-Kaltwasser, C.R. (2014). Latin American populism: Some conceptual and normative lessons. Constellations 21(4), pp. 494–504.
Ruiz-Alba, N. & Mancinas-Chávez, R. (2020). The communications strategy via Twitter of Nayib Bukele: the millennial president of El Salvador. Communication & Society 33(2), pp. 259–75.
Ruth, S.P. (2018). Populism and the erosion of horizontal accountability in Latin America. Political Studies 66(2), pp. 356–75.
Sagarzazu I. & Thies, C. (2019). The Foreign Policy Rhetoric of Populism: Chávez, Oil and Anti-Imperialism. Political Science Quarterly 72(1), pp. 205–14.
Seligson, M.A. (2007). The rise of populism and the left in Latin America. Journal of Democracy 18(3), pp. 81–95.
Senkman, L. & Roniger, L. (2019). América Latina tras bambalinas: Teorías conspirativas, usos y abusos. Latin American Research Commons, e-book.
Skonieczny, A. (2018). Emotions and political narratives: Populism, Trump and trade. Politics and Governance 6(4), pp. 62–72.
Skonieczny, A. & Wahlrab, A. (2019). Introduction to the Special Issue on Exploring Global Populisms. Populism 2(2), pp. 105–9.
Söderbaum, F., Spandler, K., & Pacciardi, A. (2021). Contestations of the Liberal International Order: A Populist Script of Regional Cooperation (Elements in International Relations). Cambridge University Press.
Solomon, T. (2014). The affective underpinnings of soft power. European Journal of International Relations 20(3), pp. 741–20.
Stavrakakis, Y. & Katsambekis G. (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: the case of syriza. Journal of political ideologies 19(2), pp. 119–42.
Steffek J. (2003). The legitimation of international governance: A discourse approach. European Journal of International Relations 9(2), pp. 287–313.
Stengel, F.A., MacDonald, D.B., & Nabers, D. (2019). Populism and World Politics: Exploring Inter-and Transnational Dimensions. Palgrave Macmillan.
Stockemer, D., ed. (2019). Populism Around the World. Springer.
Subotic, J. (2022). Antisemitism in the global populist international. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations (forthcoming).
Tallberg, J., Bäckstrand, K., & Scholte, J.A., eds. (2018). Legitimacy in Global Governance: Sources, Processes, and Consequences. Oxford University Press.
Tallberg, J. & Zürn, M. (2019). The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: Introduction and framework. The Review of International Organizations 14, pp. 581–606.
Taş, H. (2020). The formulation and implementation of populist foreign policy: Turkey in the Eastern Mediterranean. Mediterranean Politics, pp. 1–25.
Thies, C.G. (2017). Role theory and foreign policy analysis in Latin America. Foreign Policy Analysis 13(3), pp. 662–81.
Tickner, A.B. (2008). Latin American ir and the Primacy of lo práctico. International Studies Review 10(4), pp. 739–42.
Tussie, D. (2009). Latin America: Contrasting motivations for regional projects. Review of International Studies 35(S1), pp. 169–88.
Verbeek, B. & Zaslove, A. (2017). Populism and Foreign Policy. In C.R. Kaltwasser, P.A. Taggart, P.O. Espejo, & P. Ostiguy, eds., The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford University Press, pp. 384–405.
Voeten, E. (2005). The political origins of the legitimacy of the United Nations Security Council. International Organization 59(3), pp. 527–57.
Voeten, E. (2019). Populism and Backlashes Against International Courts. Perspectives on Politics 18(2), pp. 407–22.
Walldorf, C.W. (2019). To Shape Our World for Good: Master Narratives and Regime Change in U.S. Foreign Policy, 1900–2011. Cornell University Press.
Wajner, D.F. (2019a). Making (Latin) America Great Again: Lessons from Populist Foreign Policies in the Americas. In F. Stengel, D.B. MacDonald, & D. Nabers, eds., Populism and World Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 195–225.
Wajner, D.F. (2019b). “Battling’ for Legitimacy”: Analyzing Performative Contests in the Gaza Flotilla Paradigmatic Case. International Studies Quarterly 63(4), pp. 1035–50.
Wajner, D.F. (2021). Exploring the foreign policies of populist governments:(Latin) America first. Journal of International Relations and Development 24(3), pp. 651–80.
Wajner, D.F. (2022a). The populist way out: Why contemporary populist leaders seek transnational legitimation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations (forthcoming).
Wajner, D.F. (2022b). Global Populism. In M. Oswald, ed., The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 351–67.
Wajner, D.F. & Kacowicz, A.M. (2018). The Quest for Regional Legitimation: Analyzing the Arab League’s legitimizing role in the Arab spring. Regional & Federal Studies 28(3), pp. 489–521.
Wajner D.F. & Roniger, L. (2019). Transnational Identity Politics in the Americas: Chavismo’s Regional Legitimation Strategies. Latin American Research Review 54(2), pp. 458–75.
Wehner, L.E. & Thies, C.G. (2020). The nexus of populism and foreign policy: The case of Latin America. International Relations 35(2), pp. 320–40.
Weyland, K. (2009). The rise of Latin America’s two lefts: insights from rentier state theory. Comparative politics, 41(2), 145–64.
Zúquete, J.P. (2018). From left to right and beyond: The defense of populism. In Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. Routledge, pp. 416–34.
Zürn, M. (2018). A theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. Oxford University Press.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 557 | 266 | 17 |
Full Text Views | 76 | 50 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 164 | 103 | 3 |
This article attempts to engage the burgeoning research on the transnational dimensions of populism with recent theorization on legitimation strategies in international politics. Focusing on the performative practices of the wave of Pink Tide neo-populist leaders in Latin America (also called “Chavista” or “Bolivarian”), this work identifies three main strategies of legitimation – affective, normative, and institutional – and tracks their transnational resonance. Indications of these strategies include the extrapolation of strong emotional attachments with supporters abroad, the empowerment of identity-based solidarities, and the reconstruction of regionalist projects. Their drive to mobilize transnational support has been complemented by a normative flipside – the discursive attack on rival “anti-national” elites and the readiness to use national revenues for demonstrating solidarity with international allies. Analysis details how these strategies projected the populists’ legitimacy onto the regional and global arena. This inquiry may contribute policy-oriented hindsight on the rise of populists worldwide and their potential effects on transnational practices of cooperation and defiance, primarily on regional integration, global governance, and international conflicts.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 557 | 266 | 17 |
Full Text Views | 76 | 50 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 164 | 103 | 3 |