Democratic Peace beyond Westphalia: Kang and Kant
In: Comparative Political TheorySearch for other papers by Daniel Hutton Ferris in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This piece brings into dialogue two philosophically profound and hugely influential texts on the nature and requisites of international peace: Immanuel Kant’s “Towards Perpetual Peace” (zum Ewigen Frieden) and Kang Youwei’s 康有为 Book of Great Unity 大同书. Both texts articulate bold visions of a world without international war and embed concrete institutional plans for establishing peace within strongly progressivist philosophies of history. But Kang and Kant disagree in some crucial respects. Most significantly: whilst Kant imagines a liberal peace between sovereign states, Kang argues that enduring pacification would have to be enforced by a communitarian and deliberative democratic polity spanning the earth. Reading the Book of Great Unity alongside “Perpetual Peace” raises timely and challenging questions for contemporary Kantians and, more generally, for liberal internationalist political theorists and scholars of international relations.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Allison, H. E. (2001). Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
-
Bell, D. (2014). What is Liberalism? Political Theory, 42(6), 682–715.
-
Brusadelli, F. (2020). Confucian Concord. Brill.
-
Carson, T. L. (1988). Perpetual Peace: What Kant Should have Said. Social Theory and Practice, 14(2), 173–214.
-
Cavallar, G. (1994). Kant’s Society of Nations: Free Federation or World Republic? Journal of the History of Philosophy, 32(3), 461–482.
-
Chakrabarty, D. (2008). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.
-
Cheng, A. (1985). Etude Sur le Confucianisme Han: L’Élaboration d’Une Tradition Exégétique Sur les Classiques. Institut des Hautes Etudes Chinoises.
-
Cheng, A. (1997). Nationalism, Citizenship, and the Old Text/New Text Controversy in Late Nineteenth Century China. In J. A. Fogel & P. Zarrow (Eds.), Imagining the People: Chinese Intellectuals and the Concept of Citizenship, 1890–1920 (pp. 61–81). Routledge.
-
Chōmin, N. (1992). A Discourse by Three Drunkards on Government. Shambhala Publications.
-
De Bary, W. M. T., & Lufrano, R. (2001). Sources of Chinese Tradition: From 1600 through the Twentieth Century. Columbia University Press.
-
Dessein, B. (2017). Yearning for the Lost Paradise: The “Great Unity” (datong) and its Philosophical Interpretations. Asian Studies, 5(1), 83–102.
-
Dikötter, F. (2015). The Discourse of Race in Modern China. Oxford University Press.
-
Doyle, M. W. (1983). Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(3), 205–235.
-
Dryzek, J. S. (2012). Global Civil Society: The Progress of Post-Westphalian Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 101–119.
-
Gan, Y. (2019). Kang Youwei and Institutional Confucianism. In J. A. Fogel, T. Cheek, & D. Ownby (Eds.), & D. Ownby (Trans.), Voices from the Chinese Century. (pp. 281–305). Columbia University Press.
-
Gerring, J., & Veenendaal, W. (2020). Population and Politics: The Impact of Scale. Cambridge University Press.
-
Graham, M. H., & Svolik, M. W. (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 392–409.
-
Habermas, J. (1997). Kant’s Idea of Perpetual Peace, with the Benefit of Two Hundred Years’ Hindsight. In J. Bohman & M. Lutz-Bachmann (Eds.), Perpetual peace: Essays on Kant’s cosmopolitan ideal. (pp. 59–78). MIT Press.
-
Honneth, A. (2009). The Irreducibility of Progress: Kant’s Account of the Relationship Between Morality and History. In Pathologies of reason: On the legacy of critical theory (Vol. 23, pp. 1–18). Columbia University Press.
-
Hsia, A. (2001). The Far East as the Philosophers’ “Other”: Immanuel Kant and Johann Gottfried Herder. Revue de Litérature Comparée, 297, 13–29.
-
Hsiao, K.-C. (1975). A Modern China and a New World: K’ang Yu-Wei, Reformer and Utopian, 1858–1927. University of Washington Press.
-
Kang, Y. (1958). Da Tong Shu: The One-world Philosophy of Kʻang Yu-wei. Allen & Unwin.
-
Kang, Y. (1967). Chronological Autobiography of K’ang Yu-wei. In J. Lo (Ed. & Trans.), K’ang Yu-wei: A Biography and a Symposium (pp. 17–143). University of Arizona Press.
-
Kang, Y. (1974). Ta T’ung shu: Das Buch von der Großen Gemeinschaft (H. Kube, Trans.). Diederichs.
-
Kang, Y. (2012). Zhongguo Jindai Xueshu Mingzhu: Kang Youwei Datong Lun Er Zhong 中国近代学术名著：康有为大同论二种 (W. Zhu, Ed.). Zhongxi Bookshop 中西书局.
-
Kant, I. (1999). Practical Philosophy (M. J. Gregor, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
-
Kant, I. (2007). Anthropology, History, and Education (G. Zöller & R. B. Louden, Eds.). Cambridge University Press.
-
Kant, I. (2008). Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History. Yale University Press.
-
Kleingeld, P. (2004). Approaching perpetual peace: Kant’s defence of a league of states and his ideal of a world federation. European Journal of Philosophy, 12(3), 304–325.
-
Kleingeld, P. (2007). Kant’s Second Thoughts on Race. The Philosophical Quarterly, 57(229), 573–592.
-
Kuehn, M. (2001). Kant: A Biography. Cambridge University Press.
-
Kwong, L. S. (2001). The rise of the linear perspective on history and time in late Qing China c. 1860–1911. Past and Present, 173, 157–190.
-
Larrimore, M. (2008). Antinomies of Race: Diversity and Destiny in Kant. Patterns of Prejudice, 42(4–5), 341–363.
-
Liu, L. H., Karl, R. E., & Ko, D. (Eds.). (2013). The Birth of Chinese Feminism. Columbia University Press.
-
Lo, J. (Ed.). (1967). K’ang Yu-wei: A Biography and a Symposium. University of Arizona Press.
-
Luther, M. (1991). On Secular Authority. In H. Harro (Ed. & Trans.), Luther and Calvin on Secular Authority (pp. 1–46). Cambridge University Press.
-
Mao, Z. (2022). Lun Renmin Minzhu Zhuanzheng 论人民民主专政. Marxists.Org. https://www.marxists.org/chinese/maozedong/marxist.org-chinese-mao-19490630.htm
-
March, A. F. (2009). What is comparative political theory? The Review of Politics, 71(4), 531–565.
-
McCarthy, T. (2009). Race, Empire, and the Idea of Human Development. Cambridge University Press.
-
Molloy, S. (2019). Kant’s International Relations: The Political Theology of Perpetual Peace. University of Michigan Press.
-
Mulhall, S., & Swift, A. (1992). Liberals and Communitarians. Blackwell.
-
Muthu, S. (2009). Enlightenment Against Empire. Princeton University Press.
-
Nili, S. (2015). Who’s Afraid of a World State? A Global Sovereign and the Statist Cosmopolitan Debate. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 18(3), 241–263.
-
Pfister, L. F. (1989). A Study in Comparative Utopias: K’ang Yu-Wei and Plato. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 16(1), 59–117.
-
Piovesana, G. K. (2013). Recent Japanese Philosophical Thought 1862–1994: A Survey. Routledge.
-
Rawls, J. (2001). The Law of Peoples: With, the Idea of Public Reason Revisited. Harvard University Press.
-
Rosato, S. (2003). The flawed logic of democratic peace theory. American Political Science Review, 97(4), 585–602.
-
Sandel, M. J. (1984). The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self. Political Theory, 12(1), 81–96.
-
Scheuerman, W. E. (2008). Review Essay: Global Governance without Global Government? Political Theory, 36(1), 133–151.
-
Smith, C. A. (2019). Datong and Xiaokang. In C. Sorace, I. Franceschini, & N. Loubere (Eds.), Afterlives of Chinese communism: Political concepts from Mao to Xi (pp. 63–66). ANU Press and Verso.
-
Thompson, L. G. (1958). Introduction. In Da Tong Shu: The One-world Philosophy of Kʻang Yu-wei (pp. 10–57). Allen & Unwin.
-
Wang, B. (Ed.). (2017). Chinese Visions of World Order: Tianxia, Culture, and World Politics. Duke University Press.
-
Wendt, A. (2003). Why a World State is Inevitable. European Journal of International Relations, 9(4), 491–542.
-
Williams, M. S., & Warren, M. E. (2014). A Democratic Case for Comparative Political Theory. Political Theory, 42(1), 26–57.
-
Wong, Y.-T. (1992). Revisionism Reconsidered: Kang Youwei and the Reform Movement of 1898. The Journal of Asian Studies, 51(3), 513–544.
-
Xu, B. (2016). The Reception of Kant in China. In G. Campagnolo (Ed.), Liberalism and Chinese Economic Development: Perspectives from Europe and Asia (pp. 25–48). Routledge.
-
Yao, X. (2003). The Encyclopedia of Confucianism. Routledge.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 43 | 43 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 54 | 54 | 17 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 100 | 100 | 23 |
Democratic Peace beyond Westphalia: Kang and Kant
In: Comparative Political TheorySearch for other papers by Daniel Hutton Ferris in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This piece brings into dialogue two philosophically profound and hugely influential texts on the nature and requisites of international peace: Immanuel Kant’s “Towards Perpetual Peace” (zum Ewigen Frieden) and Kang Youwei’s 康有为 Book of Great Unity 大同书. Both texts articulate bold visions of a world without international war and embed concrete institutional plans for establishing peace within strongly progressivist philosophies of history. But Kang and Kant disagree in some crucial respects. Most significantly: whilst Kant imagines a liberal peace between sovereign states, Kang argues that enduring pacification would have to be enforced by a communitarian and deliberative democratic polity spanning the earth. Reading the Book of Great Unity alongside “Perpetual Peace” raises timely and challenging questions for contemporary Kantians and, more generally, for liberal internationalist political theorists and scholars of international relations.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 43 | 43 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 54 | 54 | 17 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 100 | 100 | 23 |