Recognition of Non-Islamic Justice in the Works of Two Classical Islamic Political Thinkers: al-Ṭurṭūshī and Ibn Khaldūn
In: Comparative Political TheorySearch for other papers by Mohamad Ghossein in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The present paper examines the place of non-Islamic justice in two medieval Islamic political texts, Abū Bakr al-Ṭurṭūshī’s (d. 1126) Lamp of Kings (Sirāj al-Mulūk) and ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Ibn Khaldūn’s (d. 1406) Prolegomena (Muqaddima). By attempting to derive the principles of political justice through reason, and by repudiating claims that normative political values are solely derived from revelation, both thinkers commit to thoroughgoing recognition of non-Islamic forms of justice. As they formulate a pessimistic account of human nature, both contend that the principal objective of political justice is deterrence of innate human lawlessness. And since humans are deemed feeble and corruptible, they may settle for practical political solutions, even if outside the tradition of scripture and revelation. In the final analysis, this rationalist account is juxtaposed to the political aims of certain strands of modern traditionalism, where the role of reason is greatly minimized, if not completely subordinated to revelation. For fundamentalist revivalists, the categories of Islamic and non-Islamic societies intimate a striking opposition between just and unjust societies. While al-Ṭurṭūshī and Ibn Khaldūn also maintain a qualitative difference between Islamic and non-Islamic polities, their conclusions are markedly different from those of the modern traditionalists. The notion of justice they advance, which rests on a pessimistic thesis, results in a more intent recognition of non-Islamic political institutions and laws, irrespective of their creedal origins.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Al-Azmeh, A. (1982). Ibn Khaldūn: An Essay in Reinterpretation. London: Frank Cass.
-
Al-Azmeh, A. (2001). Muslim Kingship: Power and the Sacred in Muslim, Christian, and Pagan Polities. New York: I.B. Tauris Publishers.
-
Al-Ghazālī. (1964). Ghazāli’s Book of Counsel for Kings (Naṣīḥat al-mulūk) (F. R. C. Bagley, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
-
Al-Masʿūdī. (2012). Murūj al-dhahab wa-maʿādin al-jawhar (M. M. Qumayḥa, ed. 3 ed.). Beirut: Dār al-kutub al-ʿilmiyya.
-
Al-Māwardī. (1996). The Ordinances of Government: Al-Aḥkām al-Sulṭāniyya wʼ al-Wilāyāt al-Dīniyya (W. H. Wahba, Trans.). Reading: Garnet Publishing.
-
Al-Ṭurṭūshī. (2006). Sirāj al-mulūk (M. F. Abū Bakr, ed. 2 ed.). Cairo: Al-dār al-miṣriyya al-lubnāniyya.
-
An-Naʿim, A. A. (2008). Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shariʿa. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
-
Averroes. (2008). Decisive Treatise: Determining the Connection Between the Law and Wisdom; and Epistle Dedicatory (C. E.Butterworth, Trans.). Provo: Brigham Young University Press.
-
Avicenna. (2009). The Metaphysics of the Healing (M. E. Marmura, Trans.). Provo: Brigham Young University Press.
-
Burns, D. E. (2016). Alfarabi and the Creation of an Islamic Political Science. The Review of Politics, 78(3), 365–389.
-
Euben, R. L. (1997). Comparative Political Theory: An Islamic Fundamentalist Critique of Rationalism. The Journal of Politics, 59(1), 28–55.
-
Euben, R. L. (1999). Enemy in the Mirror: Islamic Fundamentalism and the Limits of Modern Rationalism: A Work of Comparative Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Hillenbrand, C. (1988). Islamic Orthodoxy or Realpolitik? Al-Ghazālī’s Views on Government. Iran, 26, 81–94.
-
Ibn Khaldūn. (1858). Muqaddimat ibn Khaldūn. [Prolégomènes d’Ebn Khaldoun: texte arabe] (É. M. Quatremère, Ed.). Paris: Benjamin Duprat.
-
Ibn Khaldūn. (1958). The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History (F. Rosenthal, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
-
Ibn Taymiyya. (No date). Al-Ḥisba fī l-islām. Beirut: Dār al-kutub al-ʿilmiyya.
-
Irwin, R. (2018). Ibn Khaldun: An Intellectual Biography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Khomeini, R. (1981). Islam and Revolution: Writings and Declarations of Imam Khomeini (H. Algar, Trans.). Berkeley: Mizan Press.
-
Lambton, A. K. S. (1981). State and Government in Medieval Islam: An Introduction to the Study of Islamic Political Theory: The Jurists. New York: Routledge.
-
Locke, J. (2010). A Letter Concerning Toleration. In R. Vernon (Ed.), Locke on Toleration (pp. 3–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Mahdi, M. (1964). Ibn Khaldûn’s Philosophy of History. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (Phoenix Books).
-
March, A. (2009a). Islam and Liberal Citizenship: The Search for an Overlapping Consensus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
March, A. (2009b). What Is Comparative Political Theory? The Review of Politics, 71(4), 531–565.
-
March, A. (2010). Taking People As They Are: Islam as a “Realistic Utopia” in the Political Theory of Sayyid Quṭb. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 189–207.
-
Marlow, L. (2013). Among Kings and Sages: Greek and Indian Wisdom in an Arabic Mirror for Princes. Arabica, 60(1–2), 1–57.
-
Najjar, F. M. (2004). Ibn Rushd (Averroes) and the Egyptian Enlightenment Movement. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 31(2), 195–213.
-
Orwin, A. (2017). Redefining the Muslim Community: Ethnicity, Religion, and Politics in the Thought of Alfarabi. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
-
Quṭb, S. (2006). Milestones: Ma’alim fi’l-tareeq (A. B. al-Mehri, Ed.). Birmingham: Maktabah Booksellers and Publishers.
-
Siddiqi, A. A. (2018). Political Rationalism and the Theological Alternative in Alfarabi’s Book of Religion. The Review of Politics, 80(4), 625–648.
-
Sukidi. (2009). Naṣr Ḥāmid Abū Zayd and the Quest for a Humanistic Hermeneutics of the Qurʾān. Die Welt des Islams, 49(2), 181–211.
-
The Meaning of the Holy Qur’ān. (1999). (‘A. Y. ‘Alī, Trans.). Beltsville: Amana Publications.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 191 | 191 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 143 | 143 | 16 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 219 | 219 | 17 |
Recognition of Non-Islamic Justice in the Works of Two Classical Islamic Political Thinkers: al-Ṭurṭūshī and Ibn Khaldūn
In: Comparative Political TheorySearch for other papers by Mohamad Ghossein in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The present paper examines the place of non-Islamic justice in two medieval Islamic political texts, Abū Bakr al-Ṭurṭūshī’s (d. 1126) Lamp of Kings (Sirāj al-Mulūk) and ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Ibn Khaldūn’s (d. 1406) Prolegomena (Muqaddima). By attempting to derive the principles of political justice through reason, and by repudiating claims that normative political values are solely derived from revelation, both thinkers commit to thoroughgoing recognition of non-Islamic forms of justice. As they formulate a pessimistic account of human nature, both contend that the principal objective of political justice is deterrence of innate human lawlessness. And since humans are deemed feeble and corruptible, they may settle for practical political solutions, even if outside the tradition of scripture and revelation. In the final analysis, this rationalist account is juxtaposed to the political aims of certain strands of modern traditionalism, where the role of reason is greatly minimized, if not completely subordinated to revelation. For fundamentalist revivalists, the categories of Islamic and non-Islamic societies intimate a striking opposition between just and unjust societies. While al-Ṭurṭūshī and Ibn Khaldūn also maintain a qualitative difference between Islamic and non-Islamic polities, their conclusions are markedly different from those of the modern traditionalists. The notion of justice they advance, which rests on a pessimistic thesis, results in a more intent recognition of non-Islamic political institutions and laws, irrespective of their creedal origins.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 191 | 191 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 143 | 143 | 16 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 219 | 219 | 17 |