This paper reviews recent scholarship on P.C. (Peng Chun) Chang’s pivotal roles as a Confucian and diplomat in the drafting of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights to argue that he articulated a pioneering Confucian justification for human rights, distinctive from then-influential Western, Christian justifications. However, it also argues that theorizing the human rights advocacy of mid-20th-century Confucians like Chang does not suffice on its own to advance the compatibilist case for Confucianism and human rights, especially when it is recalled how Chang’s advocacy was forgotten. Relative to the influential human rights advocacy of East Asian churches, Confucianism also suffers from a reputational deficit in East Asian human rights thought due to its lack of civic visibility and its negative associations with developmental authoritarianisms in East Asia. The paper concludes that Confucians aiming for a more authoritative Confucian advocacy of human rights must also acknowledge and confront this reputational deficit.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
“A Declaration on Human Rights by the Taiwan Presbyterian Church” (1977). The Presbyterian Church in Taiwan: Public Statements. Accessed April 12, 2024. https://english.pct.org.tw/Article/enArticle_public_19770816.html.
Angle, S. (2012). Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bomberg, E. & Hague, A. (2018). “Faith-based Climate Action in Christian Congregations: Mobilization and Spiritual Resources”. Local Environment 23(5): pp. 582–596.
Chan, J. (2014). Confucian Perfectionism: a Political Philosophy for Modern Times. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chang, P. C. (1934). China at the Crossroads. London: Evans Brothers.
Chŏn, S. (2003). They are not Machines: Korean Women Workers and Their Fight for Democratic Trade Unionism in the 1970s. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Dufourmont, E. (2022). “Yasuoka Masahiro and the Survival of Confucianism in Postwar Japan, 1945–1983.” In S. O’Dwyer, ed., Handbook of Confucianism in Modern Japan. Tokyo: Japan Documents, pp. 168–184.
Finnis, J. (1980). Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
House Foreign Affairs Committee. (1974). Human Rights in South Korea: Implications for U.S. Policy. Washington: United States Printing Office.
House Foreign Affairs Committee. (1982). Martial Law on Taiwan and United States Foreign Policy Interests. Washington: United States Printing Office.
Huang, C. (2014). Taiwan in Transformation. Taipei: National University of Taiwan Press.
Inoue, T. (1921). Kokumin Dōtoku Gairon (国民道徳概論 Outline of a National Morality) Tokyo: Sanseidō.
Kim, S. (2023). Confucian Constitutionalism: Dignity, Rights and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Liang, Q. (1999). “On Rights Consciousness.” Contemporary Chinese Thought 31(1): pp. 14–22.
Liang, S. (2021). Fundamentals of Chinese Culture. L. Ming, trans. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Lin, C. (1999). “The Presbyterian Church in Taiwan and the Advocacy of Local Autonomy.” Sino-Platonic Papers 92. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Marchal, K. (2014). “Where are all the Confucians Tonight?” Warp, Weft and Way. Accessed July 6, 2023. http://warpweftandway.com/where-confucians-tonight/.
Maritain, J. (1943). The Rights of Man and Natural Law. D.C. Anson, trans. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Maritain, J. (1947). “Human Rights and Natural Law”. Unesco.org. Accessed April 11, 2024. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/human-rights-and-natural-law-0.
Mencius. (1970). D.C. Lau, trans. London: Penguin.
Moon, C., & Jun, B. (2011). “Modernization Strategy: Ideas and Influences.” In B. Kim, Byung-kook & E. Vogel, eds., The Park Chung Hee Era. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, pp. 115–140.
Moyn, S. (2015). Christian Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
O’Dwyer, S. (2019). Confucianism’s Prospects. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
Rawls, J. 2000. The Law of Peoples, with “The Idea of Public Reason” Revisited. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Roosevelt, E. (1961). The Autobiography of Eleanor Roosevelt. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Rosemont, H. & Ames, R. (2016). Confucian Role Ethics: A Vision for the 21st Century? Taipei: University of Taiwan Press.
Roth, H. (2018). P C Chang and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Schabas, W., ed (2013). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: The Travaux Préparatoires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sin, H. (2021). “Bagjeonghui Jeong-gwongi Jeontong Sasang-e Daehan Insig Byeonhwawa Gugmin-yunli Gyoyug” (박정희 정권기 전통 사상에 대한 인식 변화와 국민윤리 교육 Changes in Perceptions of Traditional Thoughts during the Park Jeong-hee Regime and National Ethics Education). Korean Journal of Sociology 40(1): pp. 81–118.
Smith, A. (2009). Ethno-symbolism and Nationalism. Abingdon: Routledge.
“Statement on Our National Fate” (1972). The Presbyterian Church in Taiwan: Public Statements. Accessed April 12, 2024. https://english.pct.org.tw/Article/enArticle_public_19720500.html.
Sun, P. (2018). Historic Achievement of a Common Standard: Pengchun Chang and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Berlin: Springer.
Waltz, S. (2002). “Reclaiming and Rebuilding the History of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights”. Third World Quarterly 23(3): pp. 437–448.
Ziliotti, E. (2024). “Breaking the Mould: Normative Hybridity as the Key to Contemporary ‘Non-Western’ Political Theorizing.” American Political Science Review. Accessed April 16, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055424000194.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 149 | 149 | 36 |
Full Text Views | 3 | 3 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 10 | 10 | 2 |
This paper reviews recent scholarship on P.C. (Peng Chun) Chang’s pivotal roles as a Confucian and diplomat in the drafting of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights to argue that he articulated a pioneering Confucian justification for human rights, distinctive from then-influential Western, Christian justifications. However, it also argues that theorizing the human rights advocacy of mid-20th-century Confucians like Chang does not suffice on its own to advance the compatibilist case for Confucianism and human rights, especially when it is recalled how Chang’s advocacy was forgotten. Relative to the influential human rights advocacy of East Asian churches, Confucianism also suffers from a reputational deficit in East Asian human rights thought due to its lack of civic visibility and its negative associations with developmental authoritarianisms in East Asia. The paper concludes that Confucians aiming for a more authoritative Confucian advocacy of human rights must also acknowledge and confront this reputational deficit.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 149 | 149 | 36 |
Full Text Views | 3 | 3 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 10 | 10 | 2 |