On the development of a parasitic copepod, Lamproglena clariae Fryer, 1956 (Copepoda, Lernaeidae) infecting the sharp tooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus

in Crustaceana
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


The postembryonic development of the gill parasite, Lamproglena clariae, infecting the sharp tooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus was established from egg culture and artificial infection of fish under laboratory conditions. Like most fish parasitic copepods, L. clariae has a direct life cycle utilizing only a single fish host species. Adult post metamorphosis females produce two egg strings. The mean number of eggs in each egg string was 52. Three naupliar and first copepodid stages were obtained in culture while two copepodid stages, cyclopoid and adult specimens were obtained after artificial infection of catfish in aquaria. First stage nauplii were globular in shape and densely filled with yolk. Nauplii lacked a perforation for the mouth and masticatory parts of the appendages, all of which indicate that they do not feed. Body architecture of the first copepodid stage of L. clariae is similar to that of all other copepods in the number and kind of somites: a cephalothorax with five appendages, three thoracic somites, one abdominal somite and furca rami. This seems to be a conserved morphology among the copepods. The three naupliar and three copepodid stages are described and compared to related copepods.

On the development of a parasitic copepod, Lamproglena clariae Fryer, 1956 (Copepoda, Lernaeidae) infecting the sharp tooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus

in Crustaceana



CartonY.1964. Description de Selioides bocqueti n. sp., copépode cyclopoïde parasite de Scalisetosus assimilis Mac Intosh (Aphroditidae) commensal d’Echinus esculentus L. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén.104: 84-103.

ChullasornS.YangW.DahmsH.KangtiaP.HolynskaM.AnansatitpornW.SanoamuangL.HwangJ.2009. Naupliar development of Eucyclops cf. serrulatus tropicalis, Euc. cf. spatulatus, and Ectocyclops medius Kiefer, 1930 (Copepoda: Cyclopidae). Zool. Stud.48: 12-32.

DahmsH. U.1989. First record of a lecithotrophic nauplius in Harpacticoida (Crustacea, Copepoda) collected from the Weddell Sea (Antarctica). Pol. Biol.10: 221-224.

DahmsH. U.2000. Phylogenetic implications of the crustacean nauplius. Hydrobiologia417: 91-99.

DahmsH. U.FernandoC. H.1993. Naupliar development of Mesocyclops cf. thermocyclopoides Harada, 1931 and Thermocyclops decipiens (Kiefer, 1929) (Copepoda: Cyclopoida) from Beira Lake, Sri Lanka. J. Plankt. Res.15: 9-26.

DahmsH. U.FernandoC. H.1994. Redescription of female Macrocyclops fuscus (Jurine, 1820) (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) from Ontario with a description of naupliar stages. J. Plankton Res.16: 9-21.

DefayeD.1984. Développement et nutrition chez Macrocyclops albidus (Crustacé Copépode): 1-107. (Unpubl. Doct. Thesis Université Bordeaux 1 Bordeaux).

FentonA.HakalahtiT.BandillaM.ValtonenE. T.2006. The impact of variable hatching rates on parasite control: a model of an aquatic ectoparasite in a Finnish fish farm. J. Appl. Ecol.43: 660-668.

FerrariF. D.1998. Setal developmental patterns of the thoracopods of cyclopid copepods (Cyclopoida) and their use in phylogenetic inference. Journ. Crust. Biol.18: 471-489.

FerrariF. D.AmblerJ. W.1992. Nauplii and copepodids of the cyclopoid copepod Dioithona oculata (Oithonidae) from a mangrove cay in Belize. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash.105: 275-298.

FerrariF. D.DahmsH. U.2007. Postembryonic development of the Copepoda. Crustaceana Monographs 8: 1-232. (BrillLeiden).

FryerG.1956. Parasitic crustaceans of African freshwater fishes from the Nile and Niger system. Crustaceana94: 285-303.

FryerG.1961. The parasitic Copepoda and the Branchiura of the fishes of Lake Victoria and the Victoria Nile. Proc. Zool. Soc. London137: 41-61.

FryerG.1964. A report on the parasitic Copepoda and Branchiura of the fishes of the Lake Nyasa. Proc. Zool. Soc. London127: 293-344.

FryerG.1987. Quantitative and qualitative: numbers and reality in the study of living organisms. Freshwater Biol.17: 177-189.

GrabdaJ.1963. Life cycle and morphogenesis of Lernaea cyprinacea L. Acta Parasitol. Pol.11: 169-198.

HakalahtiT.LankinenY.ValtonenE. T.2004. Ectoparasitic Argulus coregoni (Crustacea: Branchiura) hedge their bets — studies on egg hatching dynamics. Oikos107: 295-302.

HeronG.DamkaerD.1986. A new nicothoid copepod parasitic on mysids from northwestern North America. Journ. Crust. Biol.6: 652-665.

HoJ. S.1998. Cladistics of the Lernaeidae (Cyclopoida), a major family of freshwater fish parasites. J. Marine Syst.15: 177-183.

IzawaK.1987. Studies on the phylogenetic implications of ontogenetic features in the poecilostome nauplii (Copepoda: Cyclopoida). Publs Seto Mar. Biol. Lab.32: 151-217.

KabataZ.1979. Parasitic Copepoda of British fishes. (The Ray SocietyLondon).

KuangP.1962. Studies on the life history of Lamproglena chinensis Yu. Acta Hydrobiol. Sin.1: 114-123. [In Chinese.]

LützenJ.1968. On the biology of the family Herpyllobiidae (parasitic copepods). Ophelia5: 175-187.

MarxH. M.Avenant-OldewageA.1996. Redescription of Lamproglena clariae Fryer, 1956 (Copepoda, Lernaeidae), with notes on its occurrence and distribution. Crustaceana69: 509-523.

MatthewsJ. B. L.1964. On the biology of some bottom-living copepods (Aetideidae and Phaennidae) from western Norway. Sarsia16: 1-46.

MikheevV. N.PasternakA. F.ValtonenE. T.LankienY.2001. Spatial distribution and hatching of overwintered eggs of a fish ectoparasite, Argulus coregoni (Crustacea: Branchiura). Dis. Aquat. Org.46: 123-128.

NakaiN.1927. On the development of a parasitic copepod, Lernaea elegans Leigh-Sharpe, infesting on Cypinus carpio L. Journ. Imp. Fish. Bur.23: 39-59.

NichollsA. G.1934. The developmental stages of Euchaeta norvegica Boeck. Proc. R. Soc. EdinburghPart I54(4): 31-50.

PiaseckiW.GoodwinA. E.EirasJ. C.NowakB. F.2004. Importance of Copepoda in freshwater aquaculture. Zool. Stud.43: 193-205.

ShafirA.OldewageW. H.1992. Dynamics of a fish ectoparasite population: opportunistic parasitism in Argulus japonicus (Branchiura). Crustaceana62: 50-64.

South African Bureau of Standards2004. Draft 2: The welfare of animals in laboratories (SCS140.38D SANS 10386/3). (South African Bureau of Standards Pretoria).

SprostonN. G.YinW. Y.HuT.1950. The genus Lamproglena (Copepoda Parasitica): the discovery of the life-histories and males of two Chinese species from food fishes, revealing their relationship with Lernaea, and of both to the Cyclopoidea. Sinensia (N.S.) 1: 51-54.

TsotetsiA. M.Avenant-OldewageA.MashegoS. N.2004. Aspects of the ecology of Lamproglena clariae (Copepoda: Lernaeidae) from the Vaal River system, South Africa. Journ. Crust. Biol.24: 529-536.

TsotetsiA. M.Avenant-OldewageA.MashegoS. N.2005. Aspects of the pathology of Lamproglena clariae (Copepoda: Lernaeidae) on gills of Clarias gariepinus from the Vaal River system, South Africa. Afr. Zool.40: 169-178.

WilsonC. B.1918. The economic relations, anatomy, and the life history of Lernaea. Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish.35: 165-198.

World of Copepods The2002. Available online at http://www.nmnh.si.edu/iz/copepod/


  • View in gallery

    Lamproglena clariae Fryer, 1956. A, hatching of eggs; B, moulting of nauplius II into nauplius III; C, copepodid III; D, plumose legs; E, ventral view of cephalothorax: a, antenna; an, antennule; m, maxilla; mx, maxilliped. Scale bars: A-C, 0.1 mm; D, 0.3 mm; E, 0.2 mm. This figure is published in colour in the online edition of this journal, which can be accessed via http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/15685403.

  • View in gallery

    Lamproglena clariae Fryer, 1956. A, do., nauplius I; B, do., nauplius II; C, do., nauplius III. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

  • View in gallery

    Lamproglena clariae Fryer, 1956. A, do., copepodid I; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxilla; E, maxilliped; F, first swimming leg; G, second swimming leg. b, barb; cl, claw; cm, corpus maxillipedis; sh, shaft. Scale bars: A, 0.01 mm; B-G, 0.005 mm.

  • View in gallery

    Lamproglena clariae Fryer, 1956. A, do., copepodid II; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, first swimming leg; E, second swimming leg; F, third swimming leg. Scale bars: A, 0.1 mm; B-F, 0.005 mm.

  • View in gallery

    Lamproglena clariae Fryer, 1956. A, do., copepodid III; B, antennule; C, first swimming leg (similar to swimming leg 2); D, third swimming leg; E, fourth swimming leg. Scale bars: A, 0.4 mm; B-F, 0.005 mm.

  • View in gallery

    Lamproglena clariae Fryer, 1956. A, do., cyclopoid; B, female antennule; C, male antennule; D, first swimming leg (similar to swimming leg 2); E, second swimming leg (similar to swimming leg 4). Scale bars: A, 0.5 mm; B-E, 0.005 mm.

  • View in gallery

    Diagrammatic presentation of the life cycle of Lamproglena clariae Fryer, 1956.


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 19 19 7
Full Text Views 49 49 27
PDF Downloads 4 4 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0