Save

Why Williamson’s (2014) theory of hybridogenesis fails to explain the evolution of the Rhizocephala

In: Crustaceana
Authors:
H. Glenner 1Marine Biodiversity, Biological Institute, University of Bergen, Thormøhlensgate 33A, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
2Center for Macroecology and Evolution, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for other papers by H. Glenner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
J. Lützen 3Marine Biological Section, Biological Department, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 4, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for other papers by J. Lützen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

All available biological, ultrastructural, and molecular data support the conclusion that the cirripedian suborders, Rhizocephala and Thoracica, are closely related. Williamson’s speculations (Williamson, D. I., . The origin of barnacles (Thecostraca, Cirripedia). Crustaceana, 87: 755-765) that the so-called hybridogenesis can explain how Rhizocephala evolved, rest on a selective choice of other authors’ data and an ignorance of solid facts derived from decades of comparative anatomical and molecular studies.

Toutes les données biologiques, ultrastructurales et moléculaires disponibles appuient la conclusion que les sous-ordres de Cirripèdes, Rhizocephala et Thoracica, sont étroitement apparentés. Les spéculations de Williamson (Williamson, D. I., . The origin of barnacles (Thecostraca, Cirripedia)) selon lesquelles la soit-disant hybridogenèse pourrait expliquer comment les Rhizocephala ont évolué, reposent sur un choix sélectif de données d’autres auteurs et sur une ignorance de faits solides tirés de décennies d’études moléculaires et d’anatomie comparative.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 263 65 4
Full Text Views 214 4 0
PDF Views & Downloads 29 6 1