A Qualitative Exploration of Counselor Educators’ Collaborative Authorship Perceptions and Practices
In: Counseling and ValuesSearch for other papers by Jacqueline M. Swank in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Alisa Houseknecht in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Ana Puig in
Current site
Google Scholar
Limited research exists that examines the ethics of counselor educators’ collaborative authorship practices. The study purpose was to explore the collaborative authorship decision-making perceptions and practices of counselor educators (N = 11). We identified six themes: (a) human process and communication, (b) context and nature of relationships, (c) learning experiences about authorship, (d) academic and career stage expectations, (e) collaborative authorship practices, and (f) philosophy of authorship. Implications and recommendations for research are discussed.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 92 | 56 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 4 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 12 | 6 | 0 |
A Qualitative Exploration of Counselor Educators’ Collaborative Authorship Perceptions and Practices
In: Counseling and ValuesSearch for other papers by Jacqueline M. Swank in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alisa Houseknecht in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ana Puig in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Limited research exists that examines the ethics of counselor educators’ collaborative authorship practices. The study purpose was to explore the collaborative authorship decision-making perceptions and practices of counselor educators (N = 11). We identified six themes: (a) human process and communication, (b) context and nature of relationships, (c) learning experiences about authorship, (d) academic and career stage expectations, (e) collaborative authorship practices, and (f) philosophy of authorship. Implications and recommendations for research are discussed.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 92 | 56 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 4 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 12 | 6 | 0 |
