Data, Disciplines, and Dialogue: Lessons for Project Design

in Asiascape: Digital Asia
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

A common assumption in Digital Humanities (dh) project design is that ‘data’ is simply there, ready to ‘drive’ the research. The funders of a dh project described in this paper adhered to this positivistic assumption in their founding White Paper. They saw disciplines as blinders, best left behind in order to better see ‘patterns’. However, positivism was not a real-world option for the social scientists, mathematicians, and information scientists engaged in this ‘blue sky’ project, which investigated digitized historical newspaper texts. Far from being a hindrance to their work, disciplinary traditions were central to any success they achieved. Instead of moving ‘beyond’ disciplines, they developed a pluralist, cross-disciplinary dialogue. Each participant contributed out of the epistemic convention that had proven fruitful in their discipline. The approach required an intellectual and emotional commitment to dialogue, and produced tantalizing rather than wholly satisfying results. But it holds promise of more.

Data, Disciplines, and Dialogue: Lessons for Project Design

in Asiascape: Digital Asia

Sections

References

BodRens ‘Het einde van de geesteswetenschappen 1.0 (The End of Humanities 1.0)’ 2012 Amsterdam University of Amsterdam, Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen en de Faculteit der Natuurwetenschappen, Wiskunde en Informatica

CohenPatricia ‘Humanities 2.0: Digital Keys for Unlocking the Humanities’ Riches’ The New York Times 2010 November 16 retrieved 5 November 2016 from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/17/arts/17digital.html.

FickersAndreas ‘Veins Filled with the Diluted Sap of Rationality: A Critical Reply to Rens Bod’ BMGN – Low Countries Historical Review 2013 128 4 155 163 Retrieved 5 November from https://orbilu.uni.lu/bitstream/10993/22715/1/Some_Reflections_on_Digital_History_and.pdf.

HallGary GoldMatthew K. ‘Has Critical Theory Run Out of Time for Data-Driven Scholarship?’ Debates in the Digital Humanities 2012 Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press

HicksJacquelineTraagVincentReinandaRidho ‘Old Questions, New Techniques: A Research Note on the Computational Identification of Political Elites’ Comparative Sociology 2015 14 386 401 Retrieved 5 November 2016 from http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/15691330-12341347.

KaltenbrunnerWolfgang ‘Decomposition as Practice and Process: Creating Boundary Objects in Computational Humanities’ Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 2014 39 143 161

KaltenbrunnerWolfgang ‘Reflexive Inertia: Reinventing Scholarship through Digital Practices’ 2015 PhD thesis Leiden University. Retrieved 5 November 2016 from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/33061.

KlinkenGerry van ‘Introduction: Digital Methods in Asian Studies’ Asian Journal of Social Science 2015 43 539 544

LevineDonald N. Visions of the Sociological Tradition 1995 Chicago et al. University of Chicago Press

ReinandaRidhoMeijEdgarde RijkeMaarten ‘Mining, Ranking and Recommending Entity Aspects’ Paper presented to sigir 2015: 38th international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval 2015 263 272 Retrieved 5 November 2016 from https://staff.fnwi.uva.nl/m.derijke/content/publications/sigir2015-fp-mining.pdf.

ScheinfeldtTom ‘Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?’ Found History 2008 retrieved 5 November 2016 from https://foundhistory.org/2008/03/sunset-for-ideology-sunrise-for-methodology/.

ScheinfeldtTom ‘Where’s the Beef? Does Digital Humanities Have to Answer Questions?’ Found History 2010 May 12 retrieved 5 November 2016 from https://foundhistory.org/2010/05/wheres-the-beef-does-digital-humanities-have-to-answer-questions/.

TraagVincent A. ‘Complex Contagion of Campaign Donations’ PLoS ONE 2016 11 4 retrieved 5 November 2016 from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153539.

WillekensFransBaulieuAnneBodRensBoschAntal van denHoningHenkjanJongFranciska deMandemakersKeesSchomakerLambertvan ZundertJoris ‘Computational Humanities’ 2010 Amsterdam Computational Humanities Programme Committee, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) Retrieved 5 November 2016 from http://ehumanities.nl/beheer/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/computational-humanities-programmatekst-20101.pdf.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 43 43 3
Full Text Views 89 89 50
PDF Downloads 4 4 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0