A common assumption in Digital Humanities (dh) project design is that ‘data’ is simply there, ready to ‘drive’ the research. The funders of a dh project described in this paper adhered to this positivistic assumption in their founding White Paper. They saw disciplines as blinders, best left behind in order to better see ‘patterns’. However, positivism was not a real-world option for the social scientists, mathematicians, and information scientists engaged in this ‘blue sky’ project, which investigated digitized historical newspaper texts. Far from being a hindrance to their work, disciplinary traditions were central to any success they achieved. Instead of moving ‘beyond’ disciplines, they developed a pluralist, cross-disciplinary dialogue. Each participant contributed out of the epistemic convention that had proven fruitful in their discipline. The approach required an intellectual and emotional commitment to dialogue, and produced tantalizing rather than wholly satisfying results. But it holds promise of more.
BodRens‘Het einde van de geesteswetenschappen 1.0 (The End of Humanities 1.0)’2012AmsterdamUniversity of Amsterdam, Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen en de Faculteit der Natuurwetenschappen, Wiskunde en Informatica
FickersAndreas‘Veins Filled with the Diluted Sap of Rationality: A Critical Reply to Rens Bod’BMGN – Low Countries Historical Review20131284155163Retrieved 5 November from https://orbilu.uni.lu/bitstream/10993/22715/1/Some_Reflections_on_Digital_History_and.pdf.
HicksJacquelineTraagVincentReinandaRidho‘Old Questions, New Techniques: A Research Note on the Computational Identification of Political Elites’Comparative Sociology201514386401Retrieved 5 November 2016 from http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/15691330-12341347.
KaltenbrunnerWolfgang‘Reflexive Inertia: Reinventing Scholarship through Digital Practices’2015PhD thesis Leiden University. Retrieved 5 November 2016 from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/33061.
ReinandaRidhoMeijEdgarde RijkeMaarten‘Mining, Ranking and Recommending Entity Aspects’Paper presented to sigir 2015: 38th international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval2015263272Retrieved 5 November 2016 from https://staff.fnwi.uva.nl/m.derijke/content/publications/sigir2015-fp-mining.pdf.
ScheinfeldtTom‘Where’s the Beef? Does Digital Humanities Have to Answer Questions?’Found History2010May12retrieved 5 November 2016 from https://foundhistory.org/2010/05/wheres-the-beef-does-digital-humanities-have-to-answer-questions/.
WillekensFransBaulieuAnneBodRensBoschAntal van denHoningHenkjanJongFranciska deMandemakersKeesSchomakerLambertvan ZundertJoris‘Computational Humanities’2010AmsterdamComputational Humanities Programme Committee, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW)Retrieved 5 November 2016 from http://ehumanities.nl/beheer/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/computational-humanities-programmatekst-20101.pdf.